Par-delà les non-humains : le vivant-machine, face cachée de l’Anthropocène

Open Access

Publication ahead of print
Journal		Nat. Sci. Soc.


DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2026019
Published online		29 July 2026

Abergel E., 2024. Dead meat. Competing vitalities, cultivated meat imaginaries and Anthropocene diets, New York, Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
Andler D., Fagot-Largeault A., Saint-Sernin B., 2002. Philosophie des sciences I, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
Barad K., 2003. Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter, SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 3, 801-831, https://doi.org/10.1086/345321. [Google Scholar]
Beau R., Larrère C. (Eds), 2018. Penser l’Anthropocène, Paris, Presses de SciencesPo. [Google Scholar]
Bennett J., 2010. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things, Durham, Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
Benson M.H., 2019. New materialism: an ontology for the Antropocene, Natural Resources Journal, 59, 2, 251-280, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26800037?seq=1. [Google Scholar]
Blay M., 2023. L’ordre du technique. Comment il s’est imposé, comment en sortir, Paris, L’Échappée. [Google Scholar]
Bongard J., Levin M., 2021. Living things are not (20th Century) machines: updating mechanism metaphors in light of the modern science of machine behavior, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 650726, https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.650726. [Google Scholar]
Breton P., 1992. L’Utopie de la communication. Le mythe du village planétaire, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Büscher B., 2022. The nonhuman turn: critical reflections on alienation, entanglement and nature under capitalism, Dialogues in Human Geography, 12, 1, 54-73, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20438206211026200. [Google Scholar]
Calvert J., Joly P.-B., 2011. How did the gene become a chemical compound? The ontology of the gene and the patenting of DNA, Social Science Information, 50, 2, 157-177, https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411399512. [Google Scholar]
Carrié F., Doré A., Michalon J., 2023. Sociologie de la cause animale, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Chakrabarty D., 2021. The climate of history in a planetary age, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
Coole D., Frost S. (Eds), 2010. New materialisms. Ontology, agency, and politics, Durham, Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
Cremer T., Cremer M., Dietzel S., Müller S., Solovei I., Fakan S., 2006. Chromosome territories-a functional nuclear landscape, Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 18, 3, 307-316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2006.04.007. [Google Scholar]
Darwin C., 2009. L’origine des espèces au moyen de la sélection naturelle ou la lutte pour l’existence dans la nature, Paris, Flammarion. Trad. de : On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, Londres, John Murray, 1859. [Google Scholar]
Deichmann U., 2009. Chemistry and the engineering of life around 1900: research and reflections by Jacques Loeb, Biological Theory, 4, 323-332, https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00001. [Google Scholar]
Descola P., 2005. Par-delà nature et culture, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
Ereky K., 1919. Biotechnologie der fleisch-, fett-, und milcherzeugung im landwirtschaftlichen grossbetriebe: für naturwissenschaftlich gebildete Landwirte verfasst, Berlin, P. Parey. [Google Scholar]
Fox Keller E., 2003. Le siècle du gène, Paris, Gallimard. Trad. de : The century of the gene, Cambridge/London, Harvard University Press, 2000. [Google Scholar]
Geoghegan B.D., 2023. Code. From information theory to French theory, Durham, Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
Grusin R. (Ed.), 2015. The nonhuman turn, Minneapolis/London, University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
Guillibert P., 2021. Terre et capital. Pour un communisme du vivant, Paris, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
Haraway D., 1985. A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the 1980s, Socialist Review, 15, 80, 65-108. [Google Scholar]
Heams T., 2004. Biologie moléculaire : affronter la crise de la cinquantaine, in Dubessy J., Lecointre G., Silberstein M. (Eds), Les matérialismes (et leurs détracteurs), Paris, Syllepse, 237-261. [Google Scholar]
Heams T., 2011 [1^re éd. 2009]. De quoi la biologie synthétique est-elle le nom ?, in Heams T., Huneman P., Lecointre G., Silberstein M. (Eds), Les mondes darwiniens, Paris, Éditions Matériologiques, 553-598. [Google Scholar]
Heams T., 2013. Histoire critique de la notion de programme génétique, in Kupiec J.-J. (Ed.), La vie, et alors ? Débats passionnés d’hier et d’aujourd’hui, Paris, Belin, 131-146. [Google Scholar]
Heams T., 2014. Randomness in biology, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 24, 3, https://doi.org/10.1017/S096012951200076X. [Google Scholar]
Heams T., 2019. Infravies. Le vivant sans frontières, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Heams T., 2023. The contrasting role of single-cell studies in the theoretical debate on determinism in molecular biology, Organisms. Journal of Biological Sciences, 6, 2, https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-5876/18306. [Google Scholar]
Hornborg A., 2021. Objects don’t have desires: toward an anthropology of technology beyond anthropomorphism, American Anthropologist, 123, 753-766, https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13628. [Google Scholar]
Jacob F., 1970. La logique du vivant, une histoire de l’hérédité, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
Jarrige F., 2023. La ronde des bêtes. Le moteur animal et la fabrique de la modernité, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Jasanoff S., 2015. Future imperfect. Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity, in Jasanoff S., Kim S.-H. (Eds), Dreamscapes of modernity. Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1-33. [Google Scholar]
Kay L.E., 2000. Who wrote the book of life? A history of the genetic code, Stanford, Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Kupiec J.-J., 2008. L’origine des individus, Paris, Fayard. [Google Scholar]
Kupiec J.-J., Sonigo P., 2000. Ni Dieu ni gène. Pour une autre théorie de l’hérédité, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Lafontaine C., 2004. L’empire cybernétique. Des machines à penser à la pensée machine, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Lafontaine C., 2014. Le Corps-marché. La marchandisation de la vie humaine à l’ère de la bioéconomie, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Lafontaine C., 2021. Bio-objets. Les nouvelles frontières du vivant, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Lafontaine C., 2024. Les matériaux vivants, des objets comme les autres ?, Socio-Anthropologie, 49, 9-16, https://doi.org/10.4000/11yy7. [Google Scholar]
Lambert G., 2003. La légende des gènes. Anatomie d’un mythe moderne, Paris, Dunod. [Google Scholar]
Landecker H., 2016. Antibiotic resistance and the biology of history, Body & Society, 24, 4, 19-52, https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14561341. [Google Scholar]
Landecker H., 2024. Life as aftermath: social theory for an age of anthropogenic biology, Science, Technology & Human Value, https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241233946. [Google Scholar]
Latour B., 1991. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Latour B., 2007. Changer la société. Refaire la sociologie, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Latour B., 2015. Face à Gaïa. Huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Malm A., 2023. Avis de tempête. Nature et culture dans un monde qui se réchauffe, Paris, La Fabrique. Trad. de : The progress of this storm. Nature and society in a warming world, Londres/ New York, Verso Books, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Morange M., 1994. Histoire de la biologie moléculaire, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Morizot B., 2020, Raviver les braises du vivant. Un front commun, Arles/Marseille, Actes Sud/Wildproject. [Google Scholar]
Mossio M. (Ed.), 2024. Organization in biology, Cham, Springer. [Google Scholar]
Nicholson D.J., 2013. Organisms ≠ Machines, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 4, Part B, 669-678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.014. [Google Scholar]
Nicholson D.J., Dupré J. (Eds), 2018. Everything flows: towards a processual philosophy of biology, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
O’Malley M.A., 2017. From endosymbiosis to holobionts: Evaluating a conceptual legacy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 434, 34-41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.03.008. [Google Scholar]
Pàldi A., 2018. L’épigénétique ou la nouvelle ère de l’hérédité, Paris, Le Pommier. [Google Scholar]
Patterson C., 2008. Un éternel Treblinka, Paris, Calmann-Lévy. Trad. de : Eternal Treblinka: our treatment of animals and the holocaust, Woodstock, Lantern Publishing & Media. [Google Scholar]
Pauly P.J., 1990 [1^re éd. 1987]. Controlling life. Jacques Loeb and the engineering ideal in biology, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Pievani T., 2022. Imperfection. A natural history, Cambridge, The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
Porcher J., 2019. Cause animale, cause du capital, Bordeaux, Le Bord de l’eau. [Google Scholar]
Rabinbach A., 2004. Le moteur humain : l’énergie, la fatigue et les origines de la modernité, Paris, La Fabrique. Trad. de : The human motor: energy, fatigue and the origins of modernity, New York, Basic Books, 1990. [Google Scholar]
Richie C., 2024. Environmental ethics and medical reproduction, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Riskin J., 2016. The restless clock: a history of the centuries-long argument over what makes living things tick, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
Sanson A., 1888. Traité de zootechnie. Tome 1, Paris, Librairie agricole de la Maison rustique. [Google Scholar]
Tillman R., 2015. Toward a new materialism: matter as dynamic, Minding Nature, 8, 1, 30-35. [Google Scholar]
Tordjman H., 2021. La croissance verte contre la nature. Critique de l’économie marchande, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Truong N., 2023. Les penseurs du vivant, Arles, Actes Sud. [Google Scholar]
Tsing A.L., 2017. Le champignon de la fin du monde. Sur la possibilité de vivre dans les ruines du capitalisme, Paris, La Découverte. Trad. de : The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Wiener N., 1954. Cybernétique et société. L’usage humain des êtres humains, Paris, UGE. [Google Scholar]
Weill N., 2024. Les mondes possibles de Philippe Descola, Le Monde, 24 novembre, https://www.lemonde.fr/livres/article/2024/11/24/les-mondes-possibles-de-philippe-descola_6411472_3260.html. [Google Scholar]
Wake M.H., 2008. Integrative biology: science for the 21st century, BioScience, 58, 4, 349-353, https://doi.org/10.1641/B580410. [Google Scholar]
Yusoff K., 2017. Politics of the Anthropocene: formation of the commons as a geologic process, Antipode, 50, 1, 255-276, https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12334. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.