« Dans la peau du vivant ». Le persona non humain (PNH) : un outil pour un design centré vivant

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 32, Number 4, Octobre-Décembre 2024


Page(s)		427 - 439
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2025018
Published online		29 April 2025

Blanc A., Drucker-Godard C., Ehlinger S., 2014. Chapitre 17. Exploitation des données textuelles, in Thiétart R.-A. (Ed.) Méthodes de recherche en management, Malakoff, Dunod, 551-573. https://doi.org/10.3917/DUNOD.THIET.2014.01.0551. [Google Scholar]
Bornet C., Brangier É., 2013. La méthode des personas : principes, intérêts et limites, Bulletin de psychologie, 524, 2, 115-134, https://doi.org/10.3917/BUPSY.524.0115. [Google Scholar]
Clavel J., 2017. Expériences de natures, investir l’écosomatique, in Fleury C., Prévot A.-C. (Eds), Le souci de la nature, Paris, CNRS Editions, 321-336. [Google Scholar]
Cooper A., 1999. The inmates are running the asylum, in Arend U., Eberleh E., Pitschke K. (Eds), Software-Ergonomie ’99. Design von informationswelten, 17-18, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99786-9_1. [Google Scholar]
Crutzen P.J., 2002. Geology of mankind, Nature, 415, 6867, 23, https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dacey M., 2017. Anthropomorphism as cognitive Bias, Philosophy of Science, 84, 5, 1152-1164, https://doi.org/10.1086/694039. [Google Scholar]
Descola P., 2005. Par-delà nature et culture, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
Descola P., 2019. Je suis devenu un peu animiste, il m’arrive de dialoguer avec les oiseaux, Libération, 30 janvier, www.liberation.fr/plus/philippe-descola-je-suis-devenu-un-peu-animiste-il-marrive-de-dialoguer-avec-les-oiseaux-20190130_E6UE3BUCLHCL4E5VPG57POKCVY/. [Google Scholar]
Drumm T., 2015. Réintensifier les expériences animistes, Écologie politique, 51, 2, 149-157, https://shs.cairn.info/revue-ecologie-et-politique-sciences-cultures-societes-2015-2-page-149?lang=fr. [Google Scholar]
Fleury C., Prévot A.-C., 2017. Le souci de la nature. Apprendre, inventer, gouverner, Paris, CNRS Éditions. [Google Scholar]
Frawley J.K., Dyson L.E., 2014. Animal personas: acknowledging non-human stakeholders in designing for sustainable food systems, in Robertson T., O’Hara K., Loke L., Wadley G., Leong T. (Eds), Designing futures. The future of design, Proceedings of the 26th Australian computer-human interaction conference, December 2^nd-5^th, The University of Technology, Sydney, 21-30. https://dl.acm.org/action/showFmPdf?doi=10.1145%2F2686612. [Google Scholar]
Gagliano R., 2006. Review of ‘The persona lifecycle: keeping people in mind throughout product design’, by John Pruitt and Tamara Adlin, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Ubiquity, https://doi.org/10.1145/1167867.1164070. [Google Scholar]
Giacomin J., 2015. What is human centred design?, The Design Journal, 17, 4, 606-623, https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480186. [Google Scholar]
Heikkurinen P., Rinkinen J., Järvensivu T., Wilén K., Ruuska T., 2016. Organising in the Anthropocene: an ontological outline for ecocentric theorising, Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 705-714, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.016. [Google Scholar]
Hirskyj-Douglas I., Read J.C., Horton M., 2017. Animal personas: representing dog stakeholders in interaction design, in Hall L., Flint T., O’Hara S., Turner T. (Eds), HCI 2017: Digital make believe. Proceedings of the 31st International BCS human computer interaction conference, 3-6 July, Sunderland (UK). https://doi.org/10.14236/EWIC/HCI2017.37. [Google Scholar]
Hofstra N., Huisingh D., 2014. Eco-innovations characterized: a taxonomic classification of relationships between humans and nature, Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 459-468, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.11.036. [Google Scholar]
Labarthe F., Francou R., 2014. Guide de l’innovation centrée-usager. Petite boussole pour innover avec les usagers, Paris, FING, https://fing.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Guide-Innovation-Centree-Usager_Fing.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Magda D., Doussan I., 2018. Quelle(s) éthique(s) pour les relations hommes-biodiversité ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 26, 1, 60-66, https://doi.org/10.1051/NSS/2018022. [Google Scholar]
Mayring P., 2019. Qualitative content analysis: demarcation, varieties, developments, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 20, 3, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3343. [Google Scholar]
Meinard Y., 2017. Intérêts et limites de l’expérience de la biodiversité, in Fleury C., Prévot A.-C. (Eds) Le souci de la nature, Paris, CNRS Éditions, 49-60, https://hal.science/hal-01631452. [Google Scholar]
Morrison A., Chisin A., 2017. Design fiction, culture and climate change. Weaving together personas, collaboration and fabulous futures, Design Journal, 20 (sup. 1), https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352704. [Google Scholar]
Nisi V., Prandi C., Nunes N.J., 2020. Towards eco-centric interaction: urban playful interventions in the Anthropocene, in Nijholt A. (Ed.) Making smart cities more playable. Gaming media and social effects, Singapore, Springer, 235-257, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3_11. [Google Scholar]
Purser R.E., Park C., Montuori A., 1995. Limits to anthropocentrism: toward an ecocentric organization paradigm?, The Academy of Management Review, 20, 4, 1053, https://doi.org/10.2307/258965. [Google Scholar]
Robinson C., Mancini C., van der Linden J., Swanson L., Guest C., 2014. Exploring the use of personas for designing with dogs, ACI 2014: Pushing Boundaries Beyond ‘Human’, 24 October, Helsinki, https://core.ac.uk/download/82980123.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Roesch N., Sas É., d’Hont M., 2022. Zoépolis : un « co-design » élargi par l’ouverture à l’expérience des vivants, in Blum G., Coulombe-Morency T., Gauthier P. (Eds), Le design dans la démocratie. Actes du 3^e colloque Intersections du design, Montréal (Québec), Éditions Design et société, 129-149. [Google Scholar]
Star S.L., Griesemer J.R., 1989. Institutionnal ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals on Berkeley’s museum of vertrebate zoologie, Social Studies of Science, 19, 3, 387-420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Surma-aho A., Hölttä-Otto K., 2022. Conceptualization and operationalization of empathy in design research, Design Studies, 78, 101075, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101075. [Google Scholar]
Tomitsch M., Fredericks J., Vo D., Frawley J., Foth M., 2021. Non-human personas: including nature in the participatory design of smart cities, Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 50, 102-130, https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-050-006. [Google Scholar]
Tomlinson B., Nardi B., Stokols D., Raturi A., 2021. Ecosystemas: representing ecosystem impacts in design, in the 2021 ACM CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, May 8-13, Yokohama, https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450382. [Google Scholar]
Tréanton J.-R., Coenen-Huther J., 1997. Observation participante et théorie sociologique, Revue française de sociologie, 38, 4, 842-843. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.