Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 27, Number 3, Juillet/Septembre 2019
Page(s) 327 - 335
Section Vie de la recherche – Research news
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2019049
Published online 19 December 2019
  • Alvesson M., Sandberg J., 2011. Generating research questions through problematization, Academy of Management Review, 36, 2, 247-271. [Google Scholar]
  • Aubin-Houzelstein G., Girard N., Broussolle V., Chelle M., Fortun-Lamothe L., Garcia F., Lutton E., Santé A., 2019. Le développement de l’intelligence professionnelle en recherche : des situations de travail des doctorants et encadrants à un dispositif de formation pour favoriser la réussite de leurs apprentissages croisés. Communication au Colloque international de didactique professionnelle, 23-25 octobre, Longueil, Québec. [Google Scholar]
  • Baptista A., 2015. Defining doctoral supervisors’ quality profile: similarities and differences between students and supervisors’ perspectives. Communication à la UKCGE 2nd international conference on developments in doctoral education and training, avril, Lichfield, Royaume-Uni. [Google Scholar]
  • Baptista A., Frick L., Holley K., Remmik M., Tesch J., Âkerlind G., 2015. The doctorate as an original contribution to knowledge: considering relationships between originality, creativity, and innovation, Frontline Learning Research, 3, 3, 55-67. [Google Scholar]
  • Boud D., Lee A., 2005. “Peer learning” as pedagogic discourse for research education, Studies in Higher Education, 30, 5, 501-516. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coutellec L., 2013. De la démocratie dans les sciences. Épistémologie, éthique et pluralisme, Paris, Éditions Matériologiques. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crombie A.C., 1995. Commitments and styles of European scientific thinking, History of Science, 33, 2, 225-238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Delamont S., Atkinson P., 2001. Doctoring uncertainty: mastering craft knowledge, Social Studies of Science, 31, 1, 87-107. [Google Scholar]
  • Enders J., De Weert E., 2004. Science, training and career: changing modes of knowledge production and labour markets, Higher Education Policy, 17, 2, 135-152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foli O., Dulaurans M., 2013. Epistemological goal in the CIFRE doctoral program: necessary adjustments and knowledge production in context, Études de communication, 1, 59-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frances J., 2012. Portrait du doctorant en entrepreneur. Les Doctoriales : un outil « au service de la professionnalisation des doctorants » ?, Mouvements, 3, 71, 54-65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gatfield T., Alpert F., 2002. The supervisory management styles model, in Herrington T. (Ed.), Proceedings of the annual international conference of the higher education research and development society of Australasia: quality conversations, July, Perth, HERDSA, 263-273. [Google Scholar]
  • Girard N., Broussolle V., Chelle M., Garcia F., Hoch D., Lamothe L., Lutton E., Santé A., 2017. Developing reflexivity in the PhD student-supervisor(s) system: an innovative training programme in a French research institute. Communication à la UKCGE 3rd international conference on developments in doctoral education and training, 3-4 avril, Stratford-upon-Avon, Royaume-Uni. [Google Scholar]
  • Hemer S.R., 2012. Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: supervising PhD candidates over coffee, Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 6, 827-839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hubert M., Louvel S., 2012. Le financement sur projet : quelles conséquences sur le travail des chercheurs ?, Mouvements, 3, 71, 13-24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kobayashi S., 2014. Learning dynamics in doctoral supervision. Thèse de doctorat, Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen. [Google Scholar]
  • Kobayashi S., Grout B., Rump C.Ø., 2013. Interaction and learning in PhD supervision – a qualitative study of supervision with multiple supervisors, Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 8, 14, 13-25. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Boterf G., 1998. L’ingénierie des compétences, Paris, Éditions d’Organisation. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee A., 2015. Supervisor development: working from the top down, the inside out and the bottom up. Communication à la UKCGE 2nd international conference on developments in doctoral education and training, avril, Lichfield, Royaume-Uni. [Google Scholar]
  • Mainhard T., Rijst R.V.D., Tartwijk J.V., Wubbles T., 2009. A model for the supervisor-doctoral student relationship, Higher Education, 58, 359-373. [Google Scholar]
  • Malloch H., Kleymann B., Angot J., Redman T., 2007. Les Compagnons du devoir: a French compagnonnage as a HRD system, Personnel Review, 36, 4, 603-622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nasir S., Masek A., 2015. A model of supervision in communicating expectation using supervisory styles and students learning styles, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 265-271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Noël A., 2011. Gérer une thèse : angoisses de directeurs et de doctorants, Libellio AEGIS, 8, 1, 45-52. [Google Scholar]
  • Powell S., Green H., 2007. The doctorate worldwide, Maidenhead (UK), McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
  • Roland M.C., Chèvre A.M., Chadoeuf J., Hubert B., Bonnemaire J., 2002. Think forward, act now: training young researchers for sustainability. Reshaping the relationship between PhD student and adviser, in van Dam-Mieras R., Michelsen G., Winkelmann H.P. (Eds), Copernicus in Lüneburg. Higher education in the context of sustainable development and globalization, Bad Homburg, VAS Verlag für Akademische Schriften, 98-110. [Google Scholar]
  • Rostan S.M., 1994. Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: an empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity, Creativity Research Journal, 7, 2, 97-110. [Google Scholar]
  • Simon H.A., 1995. Problem forming, problem finding and problem solving in design, in Collen A., Gasparski W.W. (Eds), Design and systems. General applications of methodology. Praxiology: the international annual of practical philosophy and methodology, Vol. 3, Londres, Transaction Publishers, 245-257. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilkinas T., 2002. The PhD process: the supervisor as manager, Education and Training, 44, 3, 129-137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wittorski R., 2008. La professionnalisation, Savoirs, 17, 2, 9-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.