Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 24, Number 4, October-December 2016
Dossier « Réaffectations du foncier : régulation étatique, investissements privés et initiatives citoyennes »
Page(s) 347 - 357
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2016038
Published online 16 February 2017
  • Appadurai A. (Ed.), 1986. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Benda-Beckmann F., Benda-Beckmann K., Wiber M.G. (Eds), 2006. Changing properties of property, New York, Berghahn Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Blundo G., Olivier de Sardan J.-P. (Eds), 2006. Everyday corruption and the state: citizens and public officials in Africa, London, Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Boutry M., 2015. Trajectoires littorales de l’hégémonie birmane (Irrawaddy, Tenasserim, Sud Thaïlande), Bangkok, Irasec-Les Indes savantes. [Google Scholar]
  • Chakravarty Kaul M., 1990. Common lands in colonial Punjab: continuity and change. Communication paper, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis Colloquium, 15 October, Bloomington (IN). [Google Scholar]
  • Charney M.W., 2009. A history of modern Burma, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Cheesman N., 2010. Thin rule of law or un-rule of law in Myanmar? Pacific Affairs, 82, 4, 597-613. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Colin J.-P., 2004. Droits fonciers et dimension intrafamiliale de la gestion foncière, Document de travail de l’Unité de Recherche 095, IRD-RÉFO, 8. [Google Scholar]
  • Fassin D., 2009. Les économies morales revisitées, Annales. Histoire, sciences sociales, 6/2009, 1237-1266. [Google Scholar]
  • Furnivall J.S., 1957. An introduction to the political economy of Burma, Rangoon, Burma Book Club. [Google Scholar]
  • GRET (Groupe de recherches et d’échanges technologiques), 2015. Vers la construction d’un cadre analytique et opérationnel sur les communs, Comité technique Foncier & développement, Les notes de synthèse, 19, 1-9, http://www.foncier-developpement.fr/wp-content/uploads/Note-de-synthese-19-2.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall D., 2013. Land, Cambridge, Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Huard S., 2014. La régulation locale des conflits fonciers (Birmanie centrale). Mémoire de Master, Marseille, EHESS. [Google Scholar]
  • Hudson-Rodd N., Nyunt, M., Thamain T., Htay S., 2008. The impact of confiscation of land, labor, capital assets and forced relocation Burma by the military regime, http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs/land_confiscation1-20.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Kurosaki T., Ikuko O., Kyosuke K., Koichi F., 2004. Rich periphery, poor center: Myanmar’s rural economy under partial transition to a market economy. Technical report, Tokyo, Hitotsubashi University/COE program, https://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/rs/bitstream/10086/14041/1/D03-23.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Lavigne-Delville P., 2010. Conceptions des droits fonciers, récits de politiques publiques et controverses. Les Plans fonciers ruraux en Afrique de l’Ouest, in Colin J.-P., Le Meur P.-Y. et Léonard E. (Eds), Les politiques d’enregistrement des droits fonciers : du cadre légal aux pratiques locales, Paris, Karthala, 64-109. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Meur P.Y., 2002. Approche qualitative de la question foncière, Note méthodologique, Document de travail de l’Unité de Recherche 095, IRD-RÉFO, 4. [Google Scholar]
  • Leckie S., Simperingham, E., 2009. Housing, land, and property rights in Burma: The current legal framework, Geneva, HLP Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Lund C., 2009. Recategorizing “public” and “private” property in Ghana, Development and Change, 40, 1, 131-148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oberndorf R.B., 2012. Legal review of recently enacted farmland law and vacant, fallow and virgin lands management law, Improving the legal & policy frameworks relating to land management in Myanmar, Food Security Working Group (FSWG) Land Core Group, http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_3274.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Okell J., 1971. A guide to the romanization of Burmese, London, Royal Asiatic Society. [Google Scholar]
  • Ribot J.C., Peluso N.L., 2003. A theory of access, Rural Sociology, 68, 2, 153-181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scott J.C., 1977. The moral economy of the peasant: rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia, Yale, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott J.C., 1985. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance, Yale, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott J.C., 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, Yale, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott J.C., 2009. The art of not being governed: an anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia, Yale, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Sikor T., 2008. Public and private in natural resource governance: a false dichotomy?, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Sikor T., Lund C., 2009. Access and property: a question of power and authority, Development and Change, 40, 1, 1-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steinberg D.I., 1981. Burma’s road toward development: growth and ideology under military rule, Colorado, Westview Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor R.H., 2009. The State in Myanmar, Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Thant Myint-U, 2001. The making of modern Burma, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson E. P., 1971. The moral economy of the British crowd in the eighteen century, Past and Present, 50, 76‑136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Warr P.G., 2000. The failure of Myanmar’s agricultural policies, Southeast Asian Affairs, 219-238. [Google Scholar]
  • Woods K., 2011. Ceasefire capitalism: military-private partnerships, resource concessions and military-state building in the Burma-China borderlands, Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 4, 747-770. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woods K., 2013. The politics of the emerging agro-industrial complex in Asia’s ‘final frontier’: the war on food sovereignty in Burma, conference paper in Food sovereignty: a critical dialogue, Internal conference Yale University, 14-15 September, Yale. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.