Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 22, Number 4, Octobre-Décembre 2014
Page(s) 340 - 350
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2014047
Published online 20 January 2015
  • Aykut, S., Dahan, A., 2011. Le régime climatique avant et après Copenhague : science, politique et l’objectif de deux degrés, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19, 144-157. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Aykut, S., Comby, J.-B., Guillemot, H., 2012. Climate change controversies in French mass media 1990-2010, Journalism Studies, 13, 2, 157-174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beck, U., 2001. La société du risque : sur la voie d’une autre modernité, Paris, Aubier. [Google Scholar]
  • Cannon, T., Müller-Mahn, D., 2010. Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change, Natural Hazards, 55, 3, 621-635. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chappellaz, J., Godard, O., Huet, S., Le Treut, H., 2010. Changement climatique : les savoirs et les possibles, Montreuil, Éditions La ville brûle. [Google Scholar]
  • Comby, J.-B., Grossetête, M., 2012. Se montrer prévoyant : une norme sociale diversement appropriée, Sociologie, 3, 3, 251-266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Comby, J.-B., Romanet, V., 2012. Un problème réchauffé ? Les changements climatiques dans les médias généralistes 2007-2011. Rapport de recherche, Institut français de presse de l’université Paris II, Gis « Climat, environnement et société », Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Crucifix, M., 2011. La climatologie aujourd’hui, Revue des Questions Scientifiques, 182, 1, 3-32. [Google Scholar]
  • Dahan, A., Guillemot, H., 2006. Le changement climatique : dynamiques scientifiques, expertise, enjeux géopolitiques, Revue de Sociologie du Travail, 48, 3, 412-432. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Demeritt, D., 2001. The construction of global warming and the politics of science, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, 2, 307-337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Deser, C., Knutti, R., Solomon, S., Phillips, A., 2012. Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate, Nature Climate Change, 2, 11, 775-779. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dessai, S., Hulme, M., Lempert, R., Pielke, Jr., R.A., 2009. Do we need better predictions to adapt to a changing climate?, EOS, 90, 13, 111-112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards, P., 1999. Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, models-filtered data, Science as Culture, 8, 4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science, Lo ndon, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Foucart, S., 2010. Le Populisme climatique : Claude Allègre et Cie, enquête sur les ennemis de la science, Paris, Denoël. [Google Scholar]
  • Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the post-normal age, Futures, 25, 7, 739-755. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gieryn, T., 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists, American Sociological Review, 48, 6, 781-795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Godard, O., 2012. Les controverses climatiques en France : la logique du trouble, in Zaccai, E., Gemenne, F., Decroly, J.-M. (Ed.), Controverses climatiques, sciences et politiques, Les presses de SciencesPo, 117-140. [Google Scholar]
  • Guillemot, H., 2007. La modélisation du climat en France des années 1970 aux années 2000 : histoire, pratiques, enjeux politiques. Thèse de doctorat en Histoire des sciences, EHESS, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Guillemot, H., 2010. Connections between climate simulations and observation in climate computer modeling. Scientist’s practices and ‘bottom-up epistemology’ lessons, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 242-252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gusfield, J., 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-driving and the Symbolic Order, Chicago, Chicago University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme, M., 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme, M., 2011. Reducing the future to climate: A story of climate determinism and reductionism, Osiris, 26, 1, 245-266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme, M., Mahony, M., 2010. Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC?, Progress in Physical Geography, 34, 5, 1-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S., 1987. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science, Social Studies of Science, 17, 2, 195-230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S., 2010. A new climate for society, Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 2-3, 233-253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S., Wynne, B., 1998. Science and decision-making, in Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (Eds), Human choice and climate change, 1, Columbus (OH), Battelle Press, 1-87. [Google Scholar]
  • Knorr Cetina, K., 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lahsen, M., 2008. Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist ‘trio’ supporting the backlash against global warming, Global Environmental Change, 18, 204-219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 1991. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 2012. Enquête sur les modes d’existence : une anthropologie des Modernes, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Lecourt, D., 1993. Contre la peur suivi de Critique de l’appel de Heidelberg, Coll. Pluriel, Paris, Hachette. [Google Scholar]
  • Lemieux, C., 2007. À quoi sert l’analyse des controverses ?, Mil Neuf Cent, 1, 25, 29-43. [Google Scholar]
  • Lévy-Leblond, J.-M., 1996. La Pierre de touche, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  • McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E., 2000. Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims, Social Problems, 47, 4, 227-48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mercer, J., 2010. Disaster risk reduction or climate change adaptation: Are we reinventing the Wheel?, Journal of International Development, 22, 247-264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miller, C., 2004. Climate science and the making of a global political order, in Jasanoff, S. (Ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Millier, C., 2011. Heidelberg, vingt ans après, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 3, 19. [Google Scholar]
  • Norton, S., Suppe, F., 2001. Why atmospheric modeling is good science, in Miller, C., Edwards, P. (Ed.), Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Oreskes, N., Conway, E., 2010. Merchands of doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, London, Bloomsbury Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pestre, D., 2006. Introduction aux Science Studies, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Pielke, Jr., R.A., 2002. Policy, politics and perspective, Nature, 416, 368. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarewitz, D., 2000. Science and environmental policy: An excess of objectivity, in Frodeman, R. (Ed.), Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ), 79-98. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarewitz, D., 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse, Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 385-403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shackley, S., Risbey, J., Stone, P., Wynne, B., 1999. Adjusting to policy expectations in climate change modeling: An interdisciplinary study of flux adjustments in coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models, Climatic Change, 43, 413-454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stengers, I., 1993. L’Invention des sciences modernes, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2010. Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change, Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 213-232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trenberth, K., 2010. More knowledge, less certainty, Nature Reports Climate Change, 20-21. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Sluijs, J., Van Eijndhoven, J., Shackley, S., Wynne, B., 1998. Anchoring devices in science for policy: The case of consensus around climate sensitivity, Social Studies of Science, 28, 2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne, B., 2010. When doubt becomes a weapon, Nature, 466, 441-442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.