Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 22, Number 4, Octobre-Décembre 2014
Page(s) 340 - 350
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2014047
Published online 20 January 2015
  • Aykut, S., Dahan, A., 2011. Le régime climatique avant et après Copenhague : science, politique et l’objectif de deux degrés, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19, 144-157. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Aykut, S., Comby, J.-B., Guillemot, H., 2012. Climate change controversies in French mass media 1990-2010, Journalism Studies, 13, 2, 157-174. [CrossRef]
  • Beck, U., 2001. La société du risque : sur la voie d’une autre modernité, Paris, Aubier.
  • Cannon, T., Müller-Mahn, D., 2010. Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change, Natural Hazards, 55, 3, 621-635. [CrossRef]
  • Chappellaz, J., Godard, O., Huet, S., Le Treut, H., 2010. Changement climatique : les savoirs et les possibles, Montreuil, Éditions La ville brûle.
  • Comby, J.-B., Grossetête, M., 2012. Se montrer prévoyant : une norme sociale diversement appropriée, Sociologie, 3, 3, 251-266. [CrossRef]
  • Comby, J.-B., Romanet, V., 2012. Un problème réchauffé ? Les changements climatiques dans les médias généralistes 2007-2011. Rapport de recherche, Institut français de presse de l’université Paris II, Gis « Climat, environnement et société », Paris.
  • Crucifix, M., 2011. La climatologie aujourd’hui, Revue des Questions Scientifiques, 182, 1, 3-32.
  • Dahan, A., Guillemot, H., 2006. Le changement climatique : dynamiques scientifiques, expertise, enjeux géopolitiques, Revue de Sociologie du Travail, 48, 3, 412-432. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Demeritt, D., 2001. The construction of global warming and the politics of science, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, 2, 307-337. [CrossRef]
  • Deser, C., Knutti, R., Solomon, S., Phillips, A., 2012. Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate, Nature Climate Change, 2, 11, 775-779. [CrossRef]
  • Dessai, S., Hulme, M., Lempert, R., Pielke, Jr., R.A., 2009. Do we need better predictions to adapt to a changing climate?, EOS, 90, 13, 111-112. [CrossRef]
  • Edwards, P., 1999. Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, models-filtered data, Science as Culture, 8, 4. [CrossRef]
  • Forsyth, T., 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science, Lo ndon, Routledge.
  • Foucart, S., 2010. Le Populisme climatique : Claude Allègre et Cie, enquête sur les ennemis de la science, Paris, Denoël.
  • Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the post-normal age, Futures, 25, 7, 739-755. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Gieryn, T., 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists, American Sociological Review, 48, 6, 781-795. [CrossRef]
  • Godard, O., 2012. Les controverses climatiques en France : la logique du trouble, in Zaccai, E., Gemenne, F., Decroly, J.-M. (Ed.), Controverses climatiques, sciences et politiques, Les presses de SciencesPo, 117-140.
  • Guillemot, H., 2007. La modélisation du climat en France des années 1970 aux années 2000 : histoire, pratiques, enjeux politiques. Thèse de doctorat en Histoire des sciences, EHESS, Paris.
  • Guillemot, H., 2010. Connections between climate simulations and observation in climate computer modeling. Scientist’s practices and ‘bottom-up epistemology’ lessons, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 242-252. [CrossRef]
  • Gusfield, J., 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-driving and the Symbolic Order, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
  • Hulme, M., 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press.
  • Hulme, M., 2011. Reducing the future to climate: A story of climate determinism and reductionism, Osiris, 26, 1, 245-266. [CrossRef]
  • Hulme, M., Mahony, M., 2010. Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC?, Progress in Physical Geography, 34, 5, 1-14. [CrossRef]
  • Jasanoff, S., 1987. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science, Social Studies of Science, 17, 2, 195-230. [CrossRef]
  • Jasanoff, S., 2010. A new climate for society, Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 2-3, 233-253. [CrossRef]
  • Jasanoff, S., Wynne, B., 1998. Science and decision-making, in Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (Eds), Human choice and climate change, 1, Columbus (OH), Battelle Press, 1-87.
  • Knorr Cetina, K., 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
  • Lahsen, M., 2008. Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist ‘trio’ supporting the backlash against global warming, Global Environmental Change, 18, 204-219. [CrossRef]
  • Latour, B., 1991. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes, Paris, La Découverte.
  • Latour, B., 2012. Enquête sur les modes d’existence : une anthropologie des Modernes, Paris, La Découverte.
  • Lecourt, D., 1993. Contre la peur suivi de Critique de l’appel de Heidelberg, Coll. Pluriel, Paris, Hachette.
  • Lemieux, C., 2007. À quoi sert l’analyse des controverses ?, Mil Neuf Cent, 1, 25, 29-43.
  • Lévy-Leblond, J.-M., 1996. La Pierre de touche, Paris, Gallimard.
  • McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E., 2000. Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims, Social Problems, 47, 4, 227-48. [CrossRef]
  • Mercer, J., 2010. Disaster risk reduction or climate change adaptation: Are we reinventing the Wheel?, Journal of International Development, 22, 247-264. [CrossRef]
  • Miller, C., 2004. Climate science and the making of a global political order, in Jasanoff, S. (Ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London, Routledge.
  • Millier, C., 2011. Heidelberg, vingt ans après, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 3, 19.
  • Norton, S., Suppe, F., 2001. Why atmospheric modeling is good science, in Miller, C., Edwards, P. (Ed.), Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
  • Oreskes, N., Conway, E., 2010. Merchands of doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, London, Bloomsbury Press.
  • Pestre, D., 2006. Introduction aux Science Studies, Paris, La Découverte.
  • Pielke, Jr., R.A., 2002. Policy, politics and perspective, Nature, 416, 368. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sarewitz, D., 2000. Science and environmental policy: An excess of objectivity, in Frodeman, R. (Ed.), Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ), 79-98.
  • Sarewitz, D., 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse, Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 385-403. [CrossRef]
  • Shackley, S., Risbey, J., Stone, P., Wynne, B., 1999. Adjusting to policy expectations in climate change modeling: An interdisciplinary study of flux adjustments in coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models, Climatic Change, 43, 413-454. [CrossRef]
  • Stengers, I., 1993. L’Invention des sciences modernes, Paris, La Découverte.
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2010. Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change, Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 213-232. [CrossRef]
  • Trenberth, K., 2010. More knowledge, less certainty, Nature Reports Climate Change, 20-21.
  • Van der Sluijs, J., Van Eijndhoven, J., Shackley, S., Wynne, B., 1998. Anchoring devices in science for policy: The case of consensus around climate sensitivity, Social Studies of Science, 28, 2. [CrossRef]
  • Wynne, B., 2010. When doubt becomes a weapon, Nature, 466, 441-442. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.