Open Access
| Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 22, Number 3, Juillet-Septembre 2014
Dossier « Territoires en transition environnementale »
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 247 - 253 | |
| Section | Vie de la recherche – Research news | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2014043 | |
| Published online | 17 November 2014 | |
- Aubin, J.-P., 1996. Une métaphore mathématique du principe de précaution, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 4, 2, 146-153. [Google Scholar]
- Bonté, B., Lafond, V., Cordonnier, T., Mathias, J.-D., 2013. Using an individual-based model of uneven-aged forests for studying trade-off between timber production and deadwood preservation, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (ICCGI 2013), Nice, 21-26 juillet, 10204, 175-180. [Google Scholar]
- Carbonel, J.-P., 2002. De l’utilisation de la notion de résilience, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 10, 2, 76-79. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Chapel, L., Martin, S., Deffuant, G., 2007. Lake eutrophication: using resilience evaluation to compute sustainable policies, in Proceedings of the 10th international conference on environmental science and technology (CEST 2007), 5-7 septembre 2007, Ile de Kos, Grèce. [Google Scholar]
- Châtaigner, J.M. (Ed.), 2014. Fragilités et résilience. Les nouvelles frontières de la mondialisation, Paris, Karthala. [Google Scholar]
- Collectif ComMod, 2005. La modélisation d’accompagnement, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13, 2, 165-168. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Décamps, H., 2007. La vulnérabilité des systèmes socioécologiques aux événements extrêmes : exposition, sensibilité, résilience, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 15, 48-52. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Deffuant, G., Gilbert, N. (Eds), 2011. Viability and resilience of complex systems. Concepts, methods and case studies from ecology and society, Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Durand, M.-H., Martin, S., Saint-Pierre, P., 2012. Viabilité et développement durable, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 20, 3, 271-285. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Godard, O., 1998. Principe de précaution : renégocier les conditions de l’agir en univers controversé, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 6, 1, 41-45. [Google Scholar]
- Janssen, M., Bousquet, F., Ostrom, E., 2011. A multimethod approach to study the governance of socio-ecological systems. Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées », Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19, 4, 382-395. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Lara, M. (De), Doyen, L., 2008. Sustainable management of natural resources. Mathematical models and methods, Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Lyall, C., Tait, J., Meagher, L., Bruce, A., 2011. Interdisciplinary research journeys: Practical strategies for capturing creativity, Bloomsbury. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, S., 2004. The cost of restoration as a way of defining resilience: a viability approach applied to a model of lake eutrophication, Ecology and Society, 9, 2, 8, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art8. [Google Scholar]
- Mathevet, R., Bousquet, F., 2014. Résilience et environnement : penser les changements socioécologiques, Paris, Buchet-Chastel. [Google Scholar]
- Ostrom, E., 2005. Understanding institutional diversity, Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Quétier, F., Lavorel, S., 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions, Biological Conservation, 144, 12, 2991-2999, Doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.002. [Google Scholar]
- Reghezza-Zitt, M., Rufat, S., Djament-Tran, G., Le Blanc, A., Lhomme, S., 2012. What resilience is not : uses and abuses. Cybergeo : European Journal of Geography, 621. [Google Scholar]
- Rougé, C., 2013. Résilience et vulnérabilité dans le cadre de la théorie de la viabilité et des systèmes dynamiques stochastiques contrôlés. Thèse de doctorat en informatique, Université Blaise-Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand. [Google Scholar]
- Vivien, F.-D., Lepart, J., Marty, P. (Eds), 2013. L’évaluation de la durabilité, Versailles, Quæ. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.