Free Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 17, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2009
Page(s) 12 - 17
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2009003
Published online 16 May 2009
  • Adger, W. N., Benjaminsen, T. A., Brown, K., Svarstad, H., 2001. Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses, Development and Change, 32, 4, 681-715. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Agrawal, A., 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects, Durham and London, Duke university Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Annan, K. A., 2000. We the peoples: The role of United Nation in the 21st century, http://www.un.org/millennium/sg/report/full.htm (retrieved 10 Mai 2008). [Google Scholar]
  • Beck, U., 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Cambridge, Polity. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck, U., 1995. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk, Cambridge, Polity. [Google Scholar]
  • Bryant, R.L., Bailey, S., 1997. Third World Political Ecology, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Crampton, J.W., 2003. The Political Mapping of Cyberspace, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Eckersley, R. 1992. Environmentalism and Political Theory: Towards an Ecocentric Approach, London, University College London Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Escobar, A., 1988. Power and visibility: Development and the invention and management of the Third World, Cultural Anthropology, 3, 4, 428-443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Escobar, A., 1989. The professionalization and institutionalization of `development' in Colombia in the early post-world war II period, International Journal of Educational Development, 9, 2, 139-154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Escobar, A., 1992. Imagining a post-development era? Critical thought, development and social movements, Social Text, 31/32, 20-56. [Google Scholar]
  • Escobar, A., 1995. Encountering Development: The making and unmaking of the Third World, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Escobar, A., 1996. Construction nature: Elements for a post-structuralist political ecology, Futures, 28, 4, 325-343. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Escobar, A., 1999. After Nature. Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology, Current Anthropology, 40, 1, 1-30. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., 2001. Critical realism and political ecology, in Stainer, A., Lopez, G. (Eds), After Postmodernism: Critical Realism?, London, Athlone Press, 146-154. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science, London and New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Goldman, M., 2005. Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in an Age of Globalization, New Haven (CT), Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Guston, D.H., 2001. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction, Science Technology & Human Values, 26, 4, 399-408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heynen, N., Kaika, M., Sweyngedouw, E. (Eds), 2006. In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • IAASTD, 2008. Global Summary for Decision Makers, WB, FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S. (Ed.), 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, London and New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Jollivet, M. (Ed.), 1992. Sciences de la nature, sciences de la société : les passeurs de frontières, Paris: CNRS Éditions. [Google Scholar]
  • Jollivet, M., Legay, J.-M., Mégie, G., 1993. Natures, sciences, sociétés : un titre, un champ de réflexion, une ambition, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 1, 1, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Keil, R., 2003. Urban political ecology, Urban Geography, 24, 8, 723-738. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lascoumes, P., 1994. L'Éco-pouvoir : environnement et politique, Paris, La découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 1997. Nous n'avons jamais été modernes : essai d'anthropologie symétrique, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Leach, M., Mearns, R., 1996. The Lie of the Land: Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment, Oxford, Heinemann & James Currey Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  • Mayer, J.D., 1996. The political ecology of disease as one new focus for medical geography, Progress in Human Geography, 20, 4, 441-456. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCarthy, J., 2002. First World political ecology: lessons from the wise use movement, Environment and Planning, 34, 1281-1302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCarthy, J., 2005. First World political ecology: directions and challenges, Environment and Planning A, 37, 6, 953-958. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Washington, DC, World Resources Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Peet, R., Watts, M. (Eds), 1996. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, London and New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Richmond, C., Elliott, S.J., Matthews, R., Elliott, B., 2005. The political ecology of health: perceptions of environment, economy, health and well-being among 'Namgis First Nation, Health & Place, 11, 4, 349-365. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Robbins, P., 2004. Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction, Oxford, Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Roe, E. M., 1995. Except-Africa: Postscript to a special section on development narratives, World Development, 23, 6, 1065-1069. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schroeder, R.A., Martin, K.S., Albert, K.E., 2006. Political ecology in North America: Discovering the Third World within?, Geoforum, 37, 2, 163-168. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Shackley, S., Wynne, B., 1996. Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority, Science Technology Human Values, 21, 3, 275-302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stone, G.D., 2004. Biotechnology and the political ecology of information in India, Human Organization, 63, 2, 127-140. [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, M.D., 1999a. Conflict, environmental change, and social institutions in dryland Africa: Limitations of the community resource management approach, Society & Natural Resources, 12, 7, 643-657. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, M.D., 1999b. Merging local and regional analyses of land-use change: The case of livestock in the Sahel, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, 2, 191-219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Urbanik, J., 2007. Locating the transgenic landscape: Animal biotechnology and politics of place in Massachusetts, Geoforum, 38, 6, 1205-1218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vayda, A., Walters, B., 1999. Against political ecology, Human Ecology, 27, 1, 167-179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • WCED, 1987. Our Common Future, Oxford, WCED. [Google Scholar]
  • Zimmerer, K.S., 2000. Rescaling irrigation in Latin America: The cultural images and political ecology of water resources, Ecumene, 7, 2, 150-175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zimmerer, K., Bassett, T. (Eds), 2003. Political Ecology: An Integrative Approach to Geography and Environment-Development Studies, London and New York, Guilford. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.