Free Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 16, Number 3, Juillet-Septembre 2008
Page(s) 232 - 240
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008049
Published online 16 December 2008
  • Asa, C.S., Porton, I.J. (Eds), 2005. Wildlife contraception. Issues, methods, and applications, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Bobbé, S., 2004. Gestions faunistiques, cultures des sauvages et brouillage des catégories, Communications, 76, 203-220. [CrossRef]
  • Charvolin, F., Schwartz, C., 1992. Un dangereux relâchement ? in Theys, J., Kalaora, B. (Eds.), La Terre outragée. Les experts sont formels!, Paris, Autrement, 111-117.
  • Curtis, P.D., Decker, D.J., Stout, R.J., Richmond, M.E., Loker, C.A., 1993. Human dimensions of contraception in wildlife management, USDA national wildlife research center symposia. Contraception in wildlife management, University of Nebraska, 247-255.
  • De Planhol, X., 2004. Le paysage animal. L'homme et la grande faune : une zoogéographie historique, Paris, Fayard.
  • Fox, D., 2007. Wildlife contraception, Conservation biology, 8, 4. 07Garrott, R.A., White, P.J., Vanderbildt White, C.A., 1993. Overabundance: an issue for conservation biologists? Conservation biology, 7, 946-949.
  • Gill, R.B., Miller, M.W., 1993. Thunder in the distance: the emerging policy debate over wildlife contraception, USDA national wildlife research center symposia. Contraception in wildlife management, University of Nebraska, 257-267. 09Génot, J.-C., 2003. Quelle éthique pour la nature ?, Aix-en-Provence, Edisud.
  • Granjou, C., 2003. L'expertise scientifique à destination politique, note de recherche, Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, 114, 175-183. 11Guynn, D. C., Jr. 1997. Contraception in wildlife management: reality or illusion? in Kreeger, T. J. (Ed.) Contraception in Wildlife Management. USDA APHIS Tech. Bull., 1853, 241-246
  • Hutchins, M., 2005. Foreword, in Asa, C.S., Porton, I.J. (Eds.) Wildlife contraception. Issues, methods, and applications, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Kirkpatrick, J.F., Frank, K.M., 2005. Contraception in free-ranging wildlife, in Asa, C.S. Porton, I.J. (Eds.) Wildlife contraception. Issues, methods and applications, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 195-219. 14 Latour, B., 1999. Politiques de la Nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie, Paris, La Découverte.
  • Le Berre, M., Ramousse, R. Papet, R., 1993. Méthodes de capture des marmottes alpines (Marmota marmota L 1758), Ibex Journal of mountain ecology, 1, 6-10.
  • Mauz, I., 2003. Histoire et mémoires du parc national de la Vanoise. 1921-1971: La construction, Grenoble, Revue de géographie alpine.
  • Micoud, A., 1993. Vers un nouvel animal sauvage : le sauvage "naturalisé vivant"?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 1, 3, 202-210.
  • Migot, P., Roué, M., 2006. La gestion de la faune sauvage : une approche interdisciplinaire, une démarche adaptative, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 14, Suppl., 1-2. 19Mougenot, C., Roussel, L., 2005. To poison or to trap? The ecologisation of `pest' control, Sociologia Ruralis, 45, 115-129. 20Parizeau, M.-H., 2006. Crise de l'environnement, crise de la modernité, in Thiaw-Po-Une, L. (Ed.), Questions d'éthique contemporaine, Paris, Stock, 1075-1096.
  • Porton, I.J., 2005. The ethics of wildlife contraception, in Asa, C. S., Porton, I.J. (Ed.) Wildlife contraception. Issues, methods, and applications, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 3-16.
  • Ramousse, R., Le Berre, M. (Eds), 1999. 5ieme Journée d'étude sur la marmotte alpine.
  • Ramousse, R., Le Berre, M., Giboulet, O., 1999. La marmotte alpine, Le courrier de l'environnement de l'Inra, 36, 39-52. 24Warren, R. J., 1995. Should wildlife biologists be involved in wildlife contraception research and management? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 23, 3, 441-444.
  • Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., Rabinowitz, A. (Eds), 2005. People and Wildlife: conflict or coexistence?, Cambridge University Press.
  • Wynne, B., 1996. Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science, in Wynne, B., Irwin, A. (Eds) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology, Cambridge University Press, 19-47.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.