Open Access
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 14, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2006
Page(s) 179 - 184
Section Forum
Published online 13 July 2006
  • Bach, R., 1999. Jonathan Livingstone Racek [original title: Jonathan Livingstone Seagull], Prague, Synergie. [Google Scholar]
  • Bauman, Z., 1996. Myslet sociologicky [original title: Thinking Sociologically], Prague, Slon. [Google Scholar]
  • Darnhofer, I., 2005. Organic farming and rural development: some evidence form Austria, Sociologia Ruralis, 45, 4, 308-323. [Google Scholar]
  • Fry, G.L.A., 2001. Multifunctional landscapes – Towards transdisciplinary research, Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 3-4, 159-168. [Google Scholar]
  • Greenwood, D.J., Levin, M., 2003. Reconstructing the Relationships Between Universities and Society Through Action Research, in Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (Eds), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, 2nd ed., London, Sage, 131-166. [Google Scholar]
  • Guenon, R., 2002. Krize moderního světa [Crisis of Modern World], Prague, Herrman & Synové. [Google Scholar]
  • Harvey, D.R., 2004. Presidential Address: How Does Economics Fit the Social World?, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55, 2, 313-337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heintz, C., Origgi, G., 2003. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity. Emergent Issues, Accessed: November, 2005. Available: [Google Scholar]
  • Huizinga, J., 2000. Ve stínech zítřka [In Shadows of Tomorrow; original title: In de Schaduwen van Morgen], Prague, Paseka. [Google Scholar]
  • Jollivet, M., 1997. La "vocation actuelle" de la sociologie rurale, Ruralia, 1, 111-132. [Google Scholar]
  • Kovách, I., Kučerová, E., 2006. The Project Class in Central Europe: The Czech and Hungarian Cases, Sociologia Ruralis, 46, 1, 3–21 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MTT Agrifood Research Finland, 2005. Agrifood Research Finland MTT. The Mission Statement, Accessed: December, 2005. Available: [Google Scholar]
  • Nisani, M., 1997. The cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research, The Social Science Journal, 34, 2, 201-216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schakel, J., 2003. Transdisciplinarity and plurality or the consequences of multifunctionality for agricultural science and education, in Van Huylenbroeck, G., Durand, G. (Eds), Multifunctional Agriculture: A new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development, Ashgate, Aldershot, 225-235. [Google Scholar]
  • Sjöblom, S., 2003. Towards a projectified society: On the logic of the project state. A paper prepared for the seminar: “On the Theory and Practice of Governance in the Project State.” Swedish School of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland, October 23-24. [Google Scholar]
  • Sperber, D., 2003. Why rethink interdisciplinarity? Accessed: August 2005. Available: interdisciplinarity/papers/1 [Google Scholar]
  • Thomson, K.J., 2001. Agricultural economics and rural development: marriage or divorce? Presidential address, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52, 3, 1-10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson Klein, J., 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice, Detroit, Wayne State University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson Klein, J., 2004. Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship, E:CO, 6, 1-2, 2-10. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Ploeg, J. D., Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Mardsen, T., de Roest, K., Sevilla-Guzmán, E., Ventura, F., 2000. Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory, Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 4, 391-408. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.