EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 13 / No 1 (Janvier-Mars 2005) Nat. Sci. Soc., 13 1 (2005) 21-32 References
Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 13, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2005
Page(s) 21 - 32
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2005003
Published online 23 March 2005
  • Auvergne, S., Fallet, B., Rousseau, L., 2001. Proposition d'une méthode d'aide à la concertation, Ingénieries, n° spécial 2001 : Multifonctionalité de l'agriculture et CTE. [Google Scholar]
  • Banville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J.-M., Boulaire, C., 1998. A stakeholder approach to MCDA, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15, 1, 15-32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bouyssou, D., Marchant, Th., Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukias, A., Vincke, Ph., 2000. Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspective, Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  • Cointe, Ch., 1998. Aide à la gestion de conflit en conception concourante dans un système distribué. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montpellier 2 (sciences pour l'ingénieur), Montpellier. [Google Scholar]
  • Dupont, Ch., 1994. La Négociation : conduite, théorie, applications, Paris, Dalloz. [Google Scholar]
  • Easterbrook, S., Beck, E.E., Goodlet, J.S., Plowman, L., Sharples, M., Wood, C.C., 1993. A survey of empirical studies of conflict, in Easterbrook, S. (Ed.), CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict, Berlin, Heidelberg, New-York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M., 2001. A framework for multi valued reasoning over inconsistent viewpoints, 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, IEEE, 411-420. [Google Scholar]
  • Eden, C., Ackermann, F., 2001. SODA – the principles, in Rosenhead, J., Mingers, J. (Eds), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, New York, John Willey and sons, 21-42. [Google Scholar]
  • Firma-project, 2000. The Firma Project, http://firma.cfpm.org/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • Grosjean, S., Fixmer, P., Brassac, Ch., 2000. Those “psychological tools” inside the design process, Knowledge-Based systems, 13, 3-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hämäläinen, R., Kettunen, E., Marttunen, M., Ehtamo, H., 2001. Evaluating a framework for multi-stakeholder decision support in water resources management, Group decision and negotiation, 10, 6, 331-353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harribey, J.-M., 1998. Le Développement soutenable, Paris, Economica. [Google Scholar]
  • Landry, M., 1995. A note on the concept of “problem”, Organization studies, Egos, 2, 16, 315-343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Landry, M., Pascot, D., Briolat, D., 1983. Can DSS evolve without changing our view of the concept of problem?, Decision Support Systems, 1, 1, 25-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Latouche, D., Lamonde, P., Julien P.-A., 1975. La Méthode des scénarios: une réflexion sur la démarche et la théorie de la prospective, Paris, La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Lax, D.A., Sebenius, J.K., 1986. The Manager as Negotiator, London, Collier Macmillan Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Mermet, L., 1992. Stratégies pour la gestion de l'environnement, Paris, L'Harmattan. [Google Scholar]
  • Minsky, M., 1985. The Society of Mind, New-York, Simon and Schuster. [Google Scholar]
  • Newell, A., 1990. Unified theories of cognition, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ostanello, A., Tsoukias, A., 1993. An explicative model of “public” interorganizational interactions, European Journal Of Operational Research. [Google Scholar]
  • Piaget, J., 1967. Les méthodes de l'épistémologie génétique, in Piaget, J. (Ed.), Logique et connaissance scientifique, Paris, Gallimard, 62-131. [Google Scholar]
  • Rasmussen, J., Brehmer, B., Leplat, J., 1991. Distributed Decision Making: Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work, John Willey and sons Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  • Retkowsky, Y., Jousseaume, C., 1998. La gestion concertée et décentralisée de l'eau en France, Revue internationale de l'eau, 7/8, 27-30. [Google Scholar]
  • Rousseau, L., 2003. Comparaison de points de vue pour la formulation de problèmes. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Roy, B., 1985. Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision, Paris, Economica. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt-Lainé, C., Pavé, A., 2002. Environnement : modélisation et modèles pour comprendre, agir ou décider dans un contexte interdisciplinaire, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 10, Suppl. 1, 5-25. [Google Scholar]
  • Shakun, M.F., 1996. Modelling and supporting task-oriented group processes: purposeful complex adaptive systems and evolutionary systems design, Group decision and negociation, 5, 305-317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simon, H.A., 1978. Rationality as Process and Product of Thought, American Economic Review, 68, 2, 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  • Stahl, G., 2000. Collaborative information environments to support knowledge construction by communities, AI & Society, 14, 1-27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Walton, R.E., McKersie, R.B., 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations, New York, McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.