EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Online First (2026) Nat. Sci. Soc., Publication ahead of print References
Open Access
Publication ahead of print
Journal
Nat. Sci. Soc.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2026010
Published online 22 April 2026
  • Agrinatura et FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation), 2020. Suivi, évaluation et apprentissage − Concepts, principes et outils, Agrinatura, Paris et FAO, Rome, https://agritrop.cirad.fr/596191/1/ca4755fr.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Alkire S., 2009. Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative perspectives, in Comin F., Qizilbash M., Alkire S. (Eds), The capability approach: concepts, measures and applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 26-50. [Google Scholar]
  • Alkire S., 2015. Capability approach and well-being measurement for public policy, OPHI Working Papers 94, University of Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Ballet J., Bazin D., Dubois J.-L., Mahieu F.-R., 2014. Freedom, responsibility and economics of the person, London/New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Barnaud C., d’Aquino P., Daré W., Mathevet R., 2016. Dispositifs participatifs et asymétries de pouvoir : expliciter et interroger les positionnements, Participations, 16, 3, 137-166. [Google Scholar]
  • Biggeri M., Arciprete C., Karkara R., 2019. Children and youth participation in decision-making and research processes, in Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 193-221. [Google Scholar]
  • BIODEV2030, 2022. Quatorze représentants des secteurs agricoles et de la pêche sénégalais s’engagent pour protéger la biodiversité, https://www.biodev2030.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Senegal-Engagements-volontaires-des-secteurs-agricoles-et-de-la-peche-Senegalais_301122.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A, 2019a. Participation, empowerment and capabilities: key lessons and future challenges, in Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 385-402. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), 2019b. The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  • Comin F., Fennell S., Anand P.B. (Eds), 2018. New frontiers of the capability approach, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Crocker D., 2009. Ethics of global development: agency, capability and deliberative democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., 2001. Ni planification locale, ni aménagement du territoire : pour une nouvelle approche de la planification territoriale, Géographie, Économie, Société, 3, 2, 279-299. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., 2002. Le pouvoir plutôt que la participation. Les principes d’une nouvelle approche de la planification territoriale décentralisée, Géographie, Économie, Société, 4, 1, 57-68, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1295926X02000059. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., 2007. Empowerment and participation: how could the wide range of social effects of participatory approaches be better elicited and compared?, The Icfai Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 6, 76-87. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., 2009. La participation comme élément d’une stratégie globale d’intervention : l’approche « gestion autonome progressive », Cahiers Agriculture, 18, 5, 433-440, https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2009.0330. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., Richebourg C., 2015. Participation : le paradoxe d’un dialogue à l’autre, in GIS Démocratie et Participation, Actes du colloque Chercheur.e.s et acteur.e.s de la participation : liaisons dangereuses et relations fructueuses, 29-30 janvier, Saint-Denis, www.participation-et-democratie.fr/actes-du-colloque-2015-0. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., Papazian H., 2014. An inclusionary strategy reaching empowering outcomes ten years after a two-year participatory land uses management, Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 3, 2, https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v3i2.6595. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., Le Page C., Bousquet F., Bah A., 2002a. A novel mediating participatory modeling: the self-design process to accompany collective decision-making, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2, 1, 59-74, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2002.000022. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., Seck S.M., Camara S., 2002b. L’acteur local avant l’expert : vers des systèmes d’information territoriaux endogènes. Une expérience au Sénégal, Natures, Sciences, Sociétés, 10, 4, 20-30, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/20021004020. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., Le Page C., Bousquet F., Bah A., 2003. Using self-designed role-playing games and a multi-agent system to empower a local decision-making process for land use management: The SelfCormas experiment in Senegal, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6, 3, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/3/5.html. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., Seck S.M., Bélières J.-F., Sarr M., 1999. Irrigation et développement régional : dix ans d’actions sur le fleuve Sénégal pour une planification régionale décentralisée, Les Cahiers de la Recherche Développement, 45, 77-84, https://revues.cirad.fr/index.php/crd/article/view/36738/36430. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., Bah A., Aubert S., 2012. L’approche participative, incrémentale et itérative en modélisation : un changement profond de cadre méthodologique. Exemple d’une modélisation multiniveau pour l’élaboration de politiques foncières au Sahel, Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 22, 1, 77-101. [Google Scholar]
  • d’Aquino P., Ba A., Bourgoin J., Cefai D., Richebourg C., Hopsort S., Pascutto T., 2017. Du savoir local au pouvoir central : un processus participatif sur la réforme foncière au Sénégal, Natures, Sciences, Sociétés, 25, 4, 360-369, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018001. [Google Scholar]
  • Davis J.B., 2015. Agency and the process aspect of capability development: individual capabilities, collective capabilities, and collective intentions, Filosofía de la Economía, 4, 1, 5-24. [Google Scholar]
  • Evans P., 2002. Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’s development as freedom, Studies in Comparative International Development, 37, 54-60, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686261. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferrero G., Zepeda C., 2019. Planning and managing for human development: what contribution can the capability approach make?, in Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 311-338. [Google Scholar]
  • Frediani A.A., 2019. Participatory research methods and the capability approach: researching the housing dimensions of squatter upgrading initiatives, in Salvador da Bahia, Brazil, in Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 261-288. [Google Scholar]
  • Frediani A.A., Clark D.A., Biggeri M., 2019. Human development and the capability approach: the role of empowerment and participation, in Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 3-36. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammock J., 2019. The practice of participation and the capability approach, in Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 38-54. [Google Scholar]
  • Ibrahim S., 2006. From individual to collective capabilities: the capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help, Journal of Human Development, 7, 3, 397-416, https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600815982. [Google Scholar]
  • Ibrahim S., Alkire S., 2007. Agency and empowerment: a proposal for internationally comparable indicators, Oxford Development Studies, 35, 4, 379-403, https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701897. [Google Scholar]
  • Meeks G., 2018. On Sen on the capability of capabilities, in Comin F., Fennell S., Anand P. (Eds), New frontiers of the capability approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 12-52. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller J.P., 2018. On epistemic diversity, ontologies and assumptions in capability approaches, in Comin F., Fennell S., Anand P. (Eds), New frontiers of the capability approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 139-152. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitra S., 2022. A real options approach to measuring freedom in Sen’s capabilities approach. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 14, 1, 98-110, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2022.119716. [Google Scholar]
  • Nebel M., Nebel T.H.R, 2018. Measuring the meta-capability of agency: a theoretical basis for creating a responsibility indicator, in Comin F., Fennell S., Anand P. (Eds.), New frontiers the of capability approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 82-115. [Google Scholar]
  • Patron P., 2019. Power and deliberative participation in Sen’s capability approach, in Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 55-74. [Google Scholar]
  • Pham T., 2018. The capability approach and evaluation of community-driven development programs, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 19, 2, 166-180, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2017.1412407. [Google Scholar]
  • Pelenc J., Bazile D., Ceruti C., 2015. Collective capability and collective agency for sustainability: a case study, Ecological Economics, 118, 226-239, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.001. [Google Scholar]
  • Robeyns I., 2017. Wellbeing, freedom and social justice. The capability approach re-examinated, Open book Publisher, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0130. [Google Scholar]
  • Rauschmayer F., Polzin C., Mock M., Omann I., 2017. Examining collective action through the capability approach: the example of community currencies, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 345-364, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2017.1415870. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosignoli F., 2018. Categorizing collective capabilities, The Open Journal of Socio-Political Studies, 11, 3, 813-837. [Google Scholar]
  • Sen A., 1985. Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984, Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169-221, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2026184. [Google Scholar]
  • Sen A., 1999. Development as freedom, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Sen A., 2002. Response to commentaries, Studies in Comparative International Development, 37, 2, 78-86, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02686264. [Google Scholar]
  • Sen A., 2009. The idea of justice, London, Allen Lane. [Google Scholar]
  • Shariff R., 2018. Collective agency capability: how capabilities can emerge in a social moment, in Comin F., Fennell S., Anand P. (Eds), New frontiers of the capability approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 153-176. [Google Scholar]
  • Trommlerová S., Klasen S., Lessmann O., 2015. Determinants of empowerment in a capability-based poverty approach: evidence from The Gambia, World Development, 66, 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.008. [Google Scholar]
  • Unterlhalter E., 2019. Balancing pessimism of the intellect and optimism of the will: some reflections on the capability approach, gender, empowerment, and education, in Clark D.A., Biggeri M., Frediani A.A. (Eds), The capability approach, empowerment and participation. Concepts, methods and applications, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 75-100. [Google Scholar]
  • Warner J., 2018. Capacities and the common goods, in Comin F., Fennell S., Anand P. (Eds), New frontiers of the capability approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 53-81. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.