Efficience économique et financement des solutions fondées sur la nature : le cas du bassin versant de la Brague

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 30, Number 3-4, Juillet/Décembre 2022


Page(s)		238 - 253
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2023010
Published online		10 April 2023

Agence de l’eau Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse, 2016. Délimiter l’espace de bon fonctionnement des cours d’eau. Guide Technique du SDAGE, Agence de l’eau Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse, https://www.eaurmc.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2017-05/2016-guide-ebf-cours-d-eau-hdef.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Albert C., Schröter B., Haase D., Brillinger M., Henze J., Herrmann S., Matzdorf B., 2019. Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 182, 12-21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Andersson E., Borgström S., McPhearson T., 2017. Double insurance in dealing with extremes: ecological and social factors for making nature-based solutions last, in Kabisch N., Korn H., Stadler J., Bonn A. (Eds), Nature‐based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas, Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions, Springer Open, 51-64, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Arfaoui N., Gnonlonfin A., 2020. Testing meta-regression analysis in the context of NBS restoration measures: The case of Brague river, Working Paper ESDES n°2020-02, https://www.esdes.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2020/11/wp_esdes_2020_02_arfaoui_gnonlonfin.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Brander L., Brouwer R., Wagtendonk A., 2013. Economic valuation of regulating services provided by wetlands in agricultural landscapes: A meta-analysis, Ecological Engineering, 56, 89-96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Carolus J.F., Hanley N., Olsen S.B., Pedersen S.M., 2018. A bottom-up approach to environmental cost-benefit analysis, Ecological Economics, 152, 282-295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Commissariat général au développement durable, 2018. Analyse multicritère des projets de prévention des inondations. Guide méthodologique, Commissariat général au développement durable, https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/Théma%20-%20Analyse%20multicritère%20des%20projets%20de%20prévention%20des%20inondations%20-%20Guide.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Cohen-Shacham E., Walters G., Janzen C., Maginnis S., 2016. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-036.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Colvin R., Witt G.B., Lacey J., 2016. Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: insights from practitioners to go beyond the ‘usual suspects’, Land Use Policy, 52, 266-276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Douai A., Plumecocq G., 2017. L’économie écologique, Paris, Repères, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Eggermont H., Balian E., Azevedo J.M.N., Beumer V., Brodin T., Claudet J., Le Roux X., 2015. Nature-based solutions: new influence for environmental management and research in Europe, GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24, 4, 243-248, https://www.biodiversa.org/898/download. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fournier M., 2019. Flood Governance in France: From Hegemony to Diversity in the French Flood-Risk Management Actors’ Network, In La Jeunesse I., Larrue C. (Eds.), Facing Hydrometeorological Extreme Events, Chichester, UK, John Wiley et Sons, Ltd, 125-139, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119383567.ch9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Frey U.J., Pirscher F., 2019. Distinguishing protest responses in motivations and attitudes behind them, PLoS One, 14, 1, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209872. [Google Scholar]
Gnonlonfin A., Piton G., Marchal R., Munir M.B., Wang Z.X., Moncoulon D., Mas A., Arnaud P., Tacnet J.-M., Douai A., 2019. Deliverable 6.3 Demo insurance value assessment − Part 7: France: Brague. NAIAD H2020 project (Grant Agreement n° 730497), 267-428, https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03027263/. [Google Scholar]
Gnonlonfin A., Douai A., 2019. Rapport d’enquête : Quel avenir pour la Brague face au risque d’inondation ?. Rapport de recherche, EU Horizon 2020 NAIAD Project, Grant Agreement N°730497, https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03030376. [Google Scholar]
Halstead J., Luloff A., Stevens T., 1992. Protest bidders in contingent valuation. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21, 2, 160-169, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0899367x00002683. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Heckman J.J., 1976. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of economic and social measurement, 5, 4, 475-492, http://www.nber.org/books/aesm76-4. [Google Scholar]
Johnston R.J., Boyle K.J., Adamowicz W., Bennett J., Brouwer R., Cameron T.A., Vossler C.A., 2017. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4, 2, 319-405, https://doi.org/10.1086/691697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kabisch N., Frantzeskaki N., Pauleit S., Naumann S., Davis M., Artmann M., Haase D., Knapp S., Korn H., Stadler J., Zaunberger K., Bonn A. 2016. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action, Ecology and Society, 21, 2, 39, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kallis G., Gómez-Baggethun E., Zografos C., 2013. To value or not to value? That is not the question, Ecological economics, 94, 97-105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Logar I., Brouwer R., Paillex A., 2019. Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs? A cost-benefit analysis, Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 1075-1085, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.098. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Martín-López B., Iniesta-Arandia I., García-Llorente M., Palomo I., Casado-Arzuaga I., García Del Amo D., Gómez-Baggethun E., Oteros-Rozas E., Palacios-Agundez I., Willaarts B., González J.A., Santos-Martín F., Onaindia M., López-Santiago C., Montes C., 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLOS ONE, 7, 6, e38970, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mechler R., 2016. Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost-benefit analysis, Natural Hazards, 81, 3, 2121-2147, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2170-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Meyerhoff J., Liebe U., 2010. Determinants of protest responses in environmental valuation: A meta-study, Ecological Economics, 70, 366-374, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Nesshöver C., Assmuth T., Irvine K.N., Rusch G.M., Waylen K.A., Delbaer B., Wittmer H., 2017. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective, Science of the total environment, 579, 1215-1227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
OCDE, 2018. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Further Developments and Policy Use, Paris, Éditions OCDE, https://www.oecd.org/governance/cost-benefit-analysis-and-the-environment-9789264085169-en.htm. [Google Scholar]
Pascual U., Muradian R., Brander L., Gómez-Baggethun E., Martín-López B., Verma M., Polasky S., 2010. The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity, in Kumar P. (Ed.), The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity, Ecological and economic foundations, Londres, Routledge, 183-256, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Unai-Pascual/publication/303444184_The_Economics_of_Valuing_Ecosystem_Services_and_Biodiversity/links/5746b08208aea45ee8561db8/The-Economics-of-Valuing-Ecosystem-Services-and-Biodiversity.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Piton G., Philippe F., Tacnet J.-M., Gourhand A., 2018a. Focus − Caractérisation des altérations de la géomorphologie naturelle d’un cours d’eau Application du Morphological Quality Index (IQM) aux projets d’aménagement du Grand Buëch à La Faurie, Science Eaux et Territoires, 26, 58-61, https://doi.org/10.3917/set.026.0058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Piton G., Dupire S., Arnaud P., Mas A., Marchal R., Moncoulon D., Curt T., Tacnet J.-M., 2018b. Delivrable 6.2 From hazards to risk: models for the Demos − Part 3: France: Brague catchment DEMO, NAIAD H2020 project (Grant Agreement n° 730497), 215-344, https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03026632/. [Google Scholar]
Pondorfer A., Rehdanz K., 2018. Eliciting Preferences for Public Goods in Nonmonetized Communities: Accounting for Preference Uncertainty, Land Economics, 94, 1, 73-86, https://doi.org/10.3368/le.94.1.73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rankin J., Robinson A., 2018. Accounting for protest zeros in contingent valuation studies: A review of literature, Health Economics Group (HEG), Working Paper, n°18-01, University of East Anglia, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/197777/1/1027441459.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Rey F., Breton V., Poulard C., Breil P., Meriaux P., 2018. Les solutions fondées sur la nature pour accorder la prévention des inondations avec la gestion intégrée des milieux aquatiques, Sciences Eaux et Territoires, 26, 36-41, https://doi.org/10.3917/set.026.0036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rinaldi M., Surian N., Comiti F., Bussettini M., 2013. A method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: The Morphological Quality Index (IQM), Geomorphology, 180, 96-108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rinaldi M., Belletti B., Bussettini M., Comiti F., Golfieri B., Lastoria B., Marchese E., Nardi L., Surian N., 2017. New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams, Journal of Environmental Management, 202, 363-378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.036. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Richardson L., Loomis J., Kroeger T., Casey F., 2015. The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation, Ecological Economics, 115, 51-58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Stern P., 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior, Journal of Social Issues, 56, 3, 407-424, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Verlynde N., Voltaire L., Chagnon P., 2019. Exploring the link between flood risk perception and public support for funding on flood mitigation policies, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62, 13, 2330-2351, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1546676. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Withey P., Sullivan D., Lantz V., 2019. Willingness to pay for protection from storm surge damages under climate change in Halifax Regional Municipality, Journal of Environmental Management, 241, 44-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.007. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.