La prédation dans le champ de la publication scientifique : un objet de recherche révélateur des mutations de la communication scientifique ouverte

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 29, Number 4, Octobre/Décembre 2021


Page(s)		382 - 395
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2022008
Published online		20 May 2022

Allman D., 2019. Pseudo or perish: problematizing the ‘predatory’ in global health publishing, Critical Public Health, 29, 4, 413-423, https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2019.1606417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Althaus V., 2019. Le capitalisme à l’assaut des sciences humaines et sociales : l’exemple des revues payantes en psychologie, Zilsel, 2, 6, 9-24, https://doi.org/10.3917/zil.006.0009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Anderson R., 2019. Citation contamination: references to predatory journals in the legitimate scientific literature, Scholarly Kitchen, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/10/28/citation-contamination-references-to-predatory-journals-in-the-legitimate-scientific-literature/. [Google Scholar]
Bagues M.F., Sylos-Labini M., Zinovyeva N., 2017. A walk on the wild side: ‘predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations, Research Policy, 48, 2, 462-477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.013. [Google Scholar]
Bawden D., Robinson L., 2009. The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies, Journal of Information Science, 35, 2, 180-191, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508095781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Beall J., 2012. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access, Nature, 489, 179, https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Beall J., 2017. What I learned from predatory publishers, Biochemia Medica, 27, 2, 273-278, https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Beigel F., 2014. Publishing from the periphery: structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s CONICET, Current Sociology, 62, 5, 743-765, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bisaccio M., 2018. Cabells’ Journal Whitelist and Blacklist: intelligent data for informed journal evaluations, Learned Publishing, 31, 3, 243-248, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Björk B.-C., Kanto-Karvonen S., Harviainen J.T., 2020. How frequently are articles in predatory open access journals cited, Publications, 8, 2, 17, https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8020017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Boukacem-Zeghmouri C., 2014. Les couleurs de la publication scientifique. Mutations dans la sous-filière de la revue scientifique STM, analysées par les industries culturelles, Les Enjeux de l’information et de la communication, 15, 1, 49-65, https://doi.org/10.3917/enic.016.0049. [Google Scholar]
Boukacem-Zeghmouri C., Leduc C., Chalabi L., 2014. Intégration des ressources Springer dans les pratiques et activités des chercheurs algériens : état des lieux et recommandations, Rapport de recherche, 1-59 (version disponible sur ArchiveSIC, https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_01003684/document). [Google Scholar]
Brainard J., 2020. Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat?, Science, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc7839. [Google Scholar]
Butler D., 2013. Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing, Nature, 495, 433-435, https://doi.org/10.1038/495433a. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Camacho M., Reckley L.K., 2018. Predatory journals: enough is enough, Laryngoscope, 128, 7, 1510, https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chambers A.H., 2019. How I became easy prey to a predatory publisher, Science, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.aax9725. [Google Scholar]
Cobey K.D., Lalu M.M., Skidmore B., Ahmadzai N., Grudniewicz A., Moher D., 2018. What is a predatory journal? A scoping review, F1000Research, 7, 1001. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cobey K.D., Grudniewicz A., Lalu M.M., Rice D.B., Raffoul H., Moher D., 2019. Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey, BMJ Open, 9, 3, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516. [Google Scholar]
Cohen A.J., Patino G., Kamal P., Ndoye M., Tresh A., Mena J., Butler C., Washington S., Breyer B.N., 2019. Perspectives from authors and editors in the biomedical disciplines on predatory journals: survey study, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21, 8, https://doi.org/10.2196/13769. [Google Scholar]
Cortegiani A., Manca A., Lalu M., Moher D., 2020. Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers, International Journal of Public Health, 65, 3-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01318-w. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Demir S.B., 2018. Predatory journals: who publishes in them and why?, Journal of Informetrics, 12, 4, 1296-1311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Djuric D., 2015. Penetrating the omerta of predatory publishing: the Romanian connection, Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 183-202, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9521-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dobusch L., Heimstädt M., 2019. Predatory publishing in management research: a call for open peer review, Management Learning, 50, 5, 607-619, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619878820. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Downes M., 2020. Thousands of Australian academics on the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers, Learned Publishing, 33, 3, 287-295, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Else H., 2018. Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions, Nature, www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06178-7. [Google Scholar]
Erdağ T.K., 2018. Boring emails: “You are invited to submit a manuscript for …”, Turkish Archives Otorhinolaryngol, 56, 4, 185-187, https://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2018.861086. [Google Scholar]
Eriksson S., Helgesson G., 2018. Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’, Learned Publishing, 31, 2, 181-183, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1135. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
Eykens J., Guns R., Jakaria Rahman A.I.M., Engels T.C.E., 2019. Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding, PloS One, 14, 11, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224541. [Google Scholar]
Ferris L.E., Winker M.A., 2017. Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals, Biochemia Medica, 27, 2, 279-284, https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.030. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Finch J. (Ed.), 2012. Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/finch-report-final.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Frandsen T.F., 2017. Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers, Scientometrics, 113, 1513-1528, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2520-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Frandsen T.F., 2019. Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature, Learned Publishing, 32, 1, 57-62, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gingras Y., 2014. Les dérives de l’évaluation de la recherche. Du bon usage de la bibliométrie, Paris, Raisons d’agir. [Google Scholar]
Gingras Y., 2018. Les transformations de la production du savoir : de l’unité de connaissance à l’unité comptable, Zilsel, 4, 2, 139-152, https://doi.org/10.3917/zil.004.0139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Grudniewicz A., Moher D., Cobey K.D., Bryson G.L., Cukier S., Allen K., Ardern C., Balcom L., Barros T., Berger M., Buitrago Ciro J., Cugusi L., Donaldson M.R., Egger M., Graham I.D., Hodgkinson M., Khan K.M., Mabizela M., Manca A., Milzow K., Mouton J., Muchenje M., Olijhoek T., Ommaya A., Patwardhan B., Poff D., Proulx L., Rodger M., Severin A., Strinzel M., Sylos-Labini M., Tamblyn R., van Niekerk M., Wicherts J.M., Lalu M.M., 2019. Predatory journals: no definition, no defence, Nature, 576, 210-212, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hedding D.W., 2019. Payouts push professors towards predatory journals, Nature, 565, 267, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00120-1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jayanth A.S., 2019. Mad rush towards predatory journals, The Hindu, December 09, www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/mad-rush-towards-predatory-journals/article30260109.ece. [Google Scholar]
Jalalian M., Mahboobi H., 2014. Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research?, Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 11, 5, 389-394, https://doi.org/10.14456/wjst.2014.16. [Google Scholar]
Kolata G., 2017. Many academics are eager to publish in worthless journals, The New York Times, October 30, 1-4, www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/science/predatory-journals-academics.html. [Google Scholar]
Kolata G., 2019. The price for ‘predatory’ publishing? $50 million, New York Times, April 5, www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/science/predatory-journals-ftc-omics.html. [Google Scholar]
Kurt S., 2018. Why do authors publish in predatory journals?, Learned Publishing, 31, 2, 141-147, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Larivière V., Haustein S., Mongeon P., 2015. The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era, PLoS ONE, 10, 6, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502. [Google Scholar]
Legendre O., 2013. L’abus d’Open access est-il nuisible à la science?, Documentaliste Sciences de l’Information, 50, 2, 13-14. [Google Scholar]
Leininger A., 2018. Storm in a teacup: predatory journals are irrelevant, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1326406. [Google Scholar]
Le Monde. 2018. Canulars scientifiques, revues prédatrices et « slow science », Publié le 30 octobre 2018, signataires : Jean Frances, Yves Gingras, Philippe Huneman, Arnaud Saint-Martin. URL : https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2018/10/30/canulars-scientifiques-revues-predatrices-et-slow-science_5376660_1650684.html. [Google Scholar]
Linacre S., Bisaccio M., Earle L., 2019. Publishing in an environment of predation: the many things you really wanted to know, but did not know how to ask, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 26, 2, 217-228, https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2019.1603423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mac Lean M., Graebner C., 2019. Report of the ad hoc investigatory committee regarding the situation of Derek Pyne in the School of Business and Economics at Thompson Rivers University, Ottawa, Canadian Association of University Teachers, www.caut.ca/sites/default/files/caut-ahic-report-derek-pyne-thompson-rivers-university_2019-11.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Martin M., 2018. Time to end predatory publishing and put research first, Research information, www.researchinformation.info/analysis-opinion/time-end-predatory-publishing-and-put-research-first. [Google Scholar]
Matumba L., Maulidi F., Balehegn M., Abay F., Salanje G., Dzimbri L., Kaunda E., 2019. Blacklisting or whitelisting? Deterring faculty in developing countries from publishing in substandard journals, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 50, 2, 83-95, https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.50.2.01. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Memon A.R., 2019. Revisiting the term predatory open access publishing, Journal of Korean Medical Science, 34, 13, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Moher D., Shamseer L., Cobey K.D., Lalu M.M., Galipeau J., Avey M.T., Ahmadzai N., Alabousi M., Barbeau P., Beck A., Daniel R., Frank R., Ghannad M., Hamel C., Hersi M., Hutton B., Isupov I., McGrath T.A., McInnes M.D.F., Page M.J., Misty Pratt, Pussegoda K., Shea B., Srivastava A., Stevens A., Thavorn K., van Katwyk S., Ward R., Wolfe D., Yazdi F., Yu A.M., Ziai H., 2017. Stop this waste of people, animals and money, Nature, 549, 23-25, https://doi.org/10.1038/549023a. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Narimani M., Dadkhah M., 2017. Predatory journals and perished articles; a letter to editor, Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, 5, 1, 1, https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v5i1.174. [Google Scholar]
Neylon C., 2017. Blacklists are technically infeasible, practically unreliable and unethical. Period, Semantic Scholar, www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Blacklists-are-technically-infeasible%2C-practically-Neylon/5f48f80247432af38d53dd673ca0f93dfa44c2f3#paper-header. [Google Scholar]
Nicholas D., Rodríguez‐Bravo B., Watkinson A., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri C., Herman E., Xu J., Abrizah A., Świgoń M., 2017. Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices, Learned Publishing, 30, 3, 205-217, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Nwagwu W.E., 2015. Counterpoints about predatory open access and knowledge publishing in Africa, Learned Publishing, 28, 2, 114-122, https://doi.org/10.1087/20150205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Nwagwu W.E., 2016. Open access in the developing regions: situating the altercations about predatory publishing, Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 40, 1, 58-80, www.muse.jhu.edu/article/611577. [Google Scholar]
Omobowale A.O., Akanle O., Adeniran A.I., Adegboyega K., 2014. Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria, Current Sociology, 62, 5, 666-684, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113508127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Saint-Martin A., 2018. L’édition scientifique « piratée ». Passage en revue et esquisse de problématisation, Zilsel, 4, 2, 179-202, https://doi.org/10.3917/zil.004.0179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Perlin M.S., Imasato T., Borenstein D., 2018. Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study, Scientometrics, 116, 255-273, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2750-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Peters P., 2007. Going all the way: how Hindawi became an open access publisher, Learned Publishing, 20, 3, 191-195, https://doi.org/10.1087/095315107x204049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pyne D., 2017. The rewards of predatory publications at a small business school, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 48, 3, 137-160, https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.48.3.137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rakotoary S., 2020. Les éditeurs prédateurs présentés par le prisme de leurs représentations, Hypotheses, https://papers.hypotheses.org/552. [Google Scholar]
Salehi M., Soltani M., Tamleh H., Teimournezhad S., 2020. Publishing in predatory open access journals: authors’ perspectives, Learned Publishing, 33, 2, 89-95, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1261. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
Sarewitz D., 2016. The pressure to publish pushes down quality, Nature, 533, 147, https://doi.org/10.1038/533147a. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schira H.R., Hurst C., 2019. Hype or real threat: the extent of predatory journals in student bibliographies, Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 14, 1, https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v14i1.4764. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Shaghaei N., Wien C., Holck J.P., Thiesen A.L., Ellegaard O., Vlachos E., Drachen T.M., 2018. Being a deliberate prey of a predator: researchers’ thoughts after having published in predatory journal, LIBER Quarterly, 28, 1, https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10259. [Google Scholar]
Shehata A.M.K., Elgllab M.F.M., 2018. Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: falling in the predatory journals trap, Learned Publishing, 31, 3, 222-229, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Shen C., Björk B.-C., 2015. ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics, BMC Medicine, 13, 230, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Siler K., 2020. Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71, 11, 1386-1401, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Singh Chawla D., 2020a. Predatory-journal papers have little scientific impact, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00031-6. [Google Scholar]
Singh Chawla D., 2020b. Warning over coronavirus and predatory journals, Nature Index, https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/warning-over-coronavirus-predatory-journals-science-research-publishing. [Google Scholar]
Smart P., 2017. Predatory journals and researcher needs, Learned Publishing, 30, 2, 103-105, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sorokowski P., Kulczycki E., Sorokowska A., Pisanski K., 2017. Predatory journals recruit fake editor, Nature, 543, 481-483, https://doi.org/10.1038/543481a. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Strinzel M., Severin A., Milzow K., Egger M., 2019. Blacklists and whitelists to tackle predatory publishing: a cross-sectional comparison and thematic analysis, mBio, 10, 3, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00411-19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Strong G., 2019. Understanding quality in research: avoiding predatory journals, Journal of Human Lactation, 35, 4, 661-664, https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419869912. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Teixeira da Silva J.A., Dobránszki J., Tsigaris P., Al-Khatib A., 2019. Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: an assessment, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45, 6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071. [Google Scholar]
Teixeira da Silva J.A., Al-Khatib A., Tsigaris P., 2020. Spam emails in academia: issues and costs, Scientometrics, 122, 1171-1188, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03315-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tijdink J.K., Schipper K., Bouter L.M., Pont P.M., de Jonge J., Smulders Y.M., 2016. How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers, BMJ Open, 6, 2, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008681. [Google Scholar]
Vaidyanathan G., 2019a. No paper, no PhD? India rethinks graduate student policy, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01692-8. [Google Scholar]
Vaidyanathan G., 2019b. India culls hundreds more ‘dubious’ journals from government approved list, Nature, 571, 7763, 7-7, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02038-0. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Vaidyanathan G., 2019c. Indian payment-for-papers proposal rattles scientists, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00514-1. [Google Scholar]
Wager E., 2017. Why we should worry less about predatory publishers and more about the quality of research and training at our academic institutions, Journal of Epidemiology, 27, 3, 87-88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.je.2017.01.001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wallace F.H., Perri T.J., 2018. Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals, Scientometrics, 115, 749-766, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2690-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wilkinson T.A., Russell C.J., Bennett W.E., Cheng E.R., Carroll A.E., 2019. A cross-sectional study of predatory publishing emails received by career development grant awardees, BMJ Open, 9, 5, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027928. [Google Scholar]
Xia J., Harmon J.L., Connolly K.G., Donnelly R.M., Anderson M.R., Howard H.A., 2015. Who publishes in “predatory” journals?, Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 66, 7, 1406-1417, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.