Open Access
Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 29, Number 3, Juillet/Septembre 2021
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 356 - 359 | |
Section | Libre opinion – Opinion | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021053 | |
Published online | 03 December 2021 |
- Achterberg P., de Koster W., van der Waal J., 2017. A science confidence gap: education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014, Public Understanding of Science, 26, 6, 704-720, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515617367. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourdieu P., 2001. Science de la science et réflexivité, Paris, Raisons d’agir. [Google Scholar]
- Chiapello E., 2017. Critical accounting, research and neoliberalism, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 47-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.09.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Connell R., Fawcett B., Meagher G., 2009. Neoliberalism, new public management and the human service professions. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Sociology, 45, 331-338, https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783309346472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Coutellec L., 2015. La science au pluriel. Essai d’épistémologie pour des sciences impliquées, Versailles, Quæ. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards M.A., Roy S., 2016. Academic research in the 21st century: maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition, Environmental Engineering Science, 34, 1, 51-61, https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0223. [Google Scholar]
- Galston W.A., 2017. The 2016 U.S. election: the populist moment, Journal of Democracy, 28, 2, 21-33, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gaulejac V. (de), 2012. La recherche malade du management, Versailles, Quæ. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kiai A., 2019. To protect credibility in science, banish ‘publish or perish’, Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 10, 1017-1018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0741-0. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamy J., 2007. Penser les rapports entre sciences et politique : enjeux historiographiques récents, Cahiers d’histoire, 102, 9-32, https://doi.org/10.4000/chrhc.242. [Google Scholar]
- Merton R.K., Shapere D., 1974. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigation, Physics Today, 27, 52, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3128814. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Monbiot G., 2011. Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist, The Guardian, 29 August, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist. [Google Scholar]
- Nedeva M., Boden R., 2006. Changing science: the advent of neo-liberalism, Prometheus, 24, 3, 269-281, https://doi.org/10.1080/08109020600877667. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M., 2001. Re-Thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty, Cambridge, Polity. [Google Scholar]
- Stengers I., 2016.“Another science is possible!” A plea for slow science, in Letiche H., Lightfoot G., Moriceau J.-L. (Eds), Demo (s). Philosophy, pedagogy, politics, Leiden, Brill, 53-70. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.