Open Access
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 29, 2021
Pour une géologie politique
Page(s) S55 - S68
Published online 01 December 2021
  • Brown W.O. Jr, Burdekin R.C., 2000. Fraud and financial markets: the 1997 collapse of the junior mining stocks, Journal of Economics and Business, 52, 3, 277–288. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown N., Rappert B., 2017. Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown N., Michael M., 2003. A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15, 1, 3-18, [Google Scholar]
  • Bridge G., 2004. Mapping the bonanza: geographies of mining investment in an era of neoliberal reform, The Professional Geographer, 56, 3, 406-421, [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell, B. (Ed), 2009. Mining in Africa: Regulation and development, IDRC. [Google Scholar]
  • Dashwood H.S., 2012. The rise of global corporate social responsibility: mining and the spread of global norms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, [Google Scholar]
  • Doganova L., 2015. Que vaut une molécule ? Formulation de la valeur dans les projets de développement de nouveaux médicaments, Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 9, 1, 17-38, [Google Scholar]
  • Filer C., Le Meur P.Y., 2017. Large-scale mines and local-level politics, ANU Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Fourcade M., 2017. State metrology: the rating of sovereigns and the judgment of nations, in Morgan, Kimberly et Orloff, Ann Shola (Eds), The many hands of the State. Theorizing political authority and social control, 103-127, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Fonseca A., 2010. How credible are mining corporations’ sustainability reports? A critical analysis of external assurance under the requirements of the international council on mining and metals, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 6, 355-370, [Google Scholar]
  • Frow E., 2013. Making big promises come true? Articulating and realizing value in synthetic biology, BioSocieties, 8, 4, 432-448, [Google Scholar]
  • Hurlbut J.B., 2015. Reimagining responsibility in synthetic biology, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2, 1, 113-116, [Google Scholar]
  • Joly P.-B., 2010. On the Economics of Techno-scientific Promises, in Akrich M., Barthe Y., Muniesa F., Mustar P. (Eds) Débordements. Mélanges offerts à Michel Callon, Paris, Presse des Mines, 203-222. [Google Scholar]
  • Joly P.-B., 2012. Innovation « responsable » et développement durable. Produire la légitimité des OGM et de leur monde, Futuribles, 383, 89-109. [Google Scholar]
  • Laurent B., 2017. Democratic experiments. Problematizing nanotechnology and democracy in Europe and the United States, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Law, J., 1987. Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, 1, 1-134. [Google Scholar]
  • MacKenzie D., Spears T., 2014. ‘The formula that killed Wall Street’: The Gaussian copula and modelling practices in investment banking, Social Studies of Science, 44, 3, 393-417, [Google Scholar]
  • Merlin J., 2014. L’émergence d’une compétence environnementale autochtone ?, Terrains et travaux, 1, 85-102, [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer M., 2015. Devices and trajectories of responsible innovation: problematising synthetic biology, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2, 1, 100-103, [Google Scholar]
  • Muniesa F., 2011. A flank movement in the understanding of valuation, The Sociological Review, 59, 2, 24-38, [Google Scholar]
  • Muniesa F., 2018. Innovation, finance et démocratie : une relation problématique, in Laurent B. et al. (Eds), Innovation et participation. Approches critiques, 235-246, Paris, Presses des Mines. [Google Scholar]
  • Tsing A., 2005. Friction. An ethnography of global connection, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Yakovleva N., 2005. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industries, Corporate Social Responsibility Series, Farnham, Ashgate. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.