Comment faciliter la construction et la conduite des projets interdisciplinaires : retour d’expérience d’un programme de recherche sur la gestion intégrée de la santé des animaux en élevage

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 29, Number 2, Avril/Juin 2021


Page(s)		213 - 222
Section		Vie de la recherche – Research news
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021035
Published online		10 September 2021

[n.s.], 2012. Appel à manifestation d’intérêt (AMI) du métaprogramme GISA, Paris, Inra. [Google Scholar]
[n.s.], 2015. Mind meld. Interdisciplinary science must break down barriers between fields to build common ground, Nature, 525, 289-290, https://doi.org/10.1038/525289b. [Google Scholar]
[n.s.], 2019. Rapport d’activité Inra 2018. Rapport, Paris, Inra. [Google Scholar]
Bark R.H., Kragt M.E., Robson B.J., 2016. Evaluating an interdisciplinary research project: lessons learned for organisation, researchers and funders, International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1449-1459, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barrué-Pastor M., 1992. L’interdisciplinarité en pratiques, in Jollivet M. (Ed.), Sciences de la nature, sciences de la société. Les passeurs de frontières, Paris, CNRS Éditions, 365-380, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionscnrs.4211. [Google Scholar]
Billaud J.-P., Hubert B., 2006. Interdisciplinarité et production de connaissances : quelles recherches voulons-nous ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 14, 233-234, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2006033. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Brown R.R., Deletic A., Wong T.H.F., 2015. Interdisciplinarity: how to catalyse collaboration, Nature, 525, 315-317, https://doi.org/10.1038/525315a. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Calavas D., Rosner G., 1997. Institutionalisation d’une recherche-action en santé animale : l’expérience du Centre d’écopathologie animale, Études et recherches sur les systèmes agraires et le développement, 30, 91-113, <hal-02841713>. [Google Scholar]
Deffontaines J.-P., Hubert B., 2004. Un regard sur l’interdisciplinarité à l’Inra. Point de vue de deux chercheurs du département Sciences pour l’action et le développement (SAD), Natures Sciences Sociétés, 12, 186-190, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2004025. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
De Pryck K., Vanderlinden J.-P., Billaud J.-P., 2018. L’animation scientifique dans la pratique interdisciplinaire : l’expérience du GIS Climat Environnement Société (2007-2015), Natures Sciences Sociétés, 26, 1, 76-83, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M., 1994. The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, London, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
Gleed A., Marchant D., 2016. Interdisciplinarity. Survey report for the Global Research Council, DJS Research, https://www.globalresearchcouncil.org/fileadmin/documents/GRC_Publications/Interdisciplinarity_Report_for_GRC_DJS_Research.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Guillou M., Riba G., Houllier F., Eddi M., Leverve X., Guyomard H., Soussana J.-F., Chemineau P., 2010. Document d’orientation Inra 2010-2020. Une science pour l’impact. Rapport, Paris, Inra, https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02823708. [Google Scholar]
Hatchuel A., le Masson P., Weil B., 2017. C-K theory: modelling creativity thinking and its impact on research, in Darbellay F., Moody Z., Lubart T. (Eds), Creativity, design thinking and interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the twenty first century, Springer, 169-181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Houe H., 2003. Co-ordinated interdisciplinary efforts on research in animal production and health, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 44, S51, https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-44-S1-S51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hubert B., Bonnemaire J., 2000. La construction des objets dans la recherche interdisciplinaire finalisée, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 8, 3, 5-19, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1240-1307(00)80056-4. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Jollivet M. (Ed.), 1992. Sciences de la nature, sciences de la société. Les passeurs de frontières, Paris, CNRS Éditions, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionscnrs.4154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Joly P.-B., Matt M., Robinson D.K.R., 2019. Research impact assessment: from ex post to realtime assessment, Journal for Research and technology Policy Evaluation, 47, 35-40, https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2019.326. [Google Scholar]
Katona G., Curtin R.T., 1980. Problem-oriented rather than discipline-oriented research, in Olson J.C. (Ed.), NA − Advances in Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, Association for Consumer Research, 44-45, https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/9645/. [Google Scholar]
Ledford H., 2015. How to solve the world’s biggest problems, Nature, 525, 308-311, https://doi.org/10.1038/525308a. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Legay J.-M., 1988. Méthodes et modèles dans l’étude des systèmes complexes, in Jollivet M. (Ed.), Pour une agriculture diversifiée, Paris, L’Harmattan, 14-22. [Google Scholar]
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, 2005. Facilitating interdisciplinary research, Washington, The National Academies Press, https://doi.org/10.17226/11153. [Google Scholar]
National Research Council, 2014. Convergence. Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond, Washington, The National Academies Press, https://doi.org/10.17226/18722. [Google Scholar]
Pischke E.C., Knowlton J.L., Phifer C.C., Gutierrez Lopez J., Propato T.S., Eastmond A., de Souza T.M., Kuhlberg M., Picasso Risso V., Veron S.R., Garcia C., Chiappe M., Halvorsen K.E., 2017. Barriers and solutions to conducting large international, interdisciplinary research projects, Environnemental Management, 60, 6, 1011-1021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0939-8. [Google Scholar]
Timmermans B., Baret P., Hiernaux Q., Lugen M., Nonclercq A., Zaccai E., 2018. L’interdisciplinarité, ça marche ! Une enquête et un colloque révèlent des facteurs de succès, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 26, 1, 67-75, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Urbanska K., Huet S., Guimond S., 2019. Does increased interdisciplinary contact among hard and social scientists help or hinder interdisciplinary research?, PLoS One, 14, 9, e0221907, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Van Noorden R., 2015. Interdisciplinary research by the numbers, Nature, 525, 306-307, https://doi.org/10.1038/525306a. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Vourc’h G., Brun J., Ducrot C., Cosson J.-F., le Masson P., Weil B., 2018. Using design theory to foster innovative cross-disciplinary research: lessons learned from a research network focused on antimicrobial use and animal microbes’ resistance to antimicrobials, Veterinary and Animal Science, 6, 12-20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2018.04.001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.