Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 27, Number 3, Juillet/Septembre 2019
Page(s) 278 - 296
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2019045
Published online 19 December 2019
  • Adams W.M., 2001 [1st ed. 1990]. Green development: environment and sustainability in the Third World, London/New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Bettencourt L.M.A., Kaur J., 2011. Evolution and structure of sustainability science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 49, 19540-19545, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102712108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borgatti S.P., 2005. Centrality and network flow, Social Networks, 27, 1, 55-71, doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008. [Google Scholar]
  • Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., 2006. A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality, Social Networks, 28, 4, 466-484, doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourdieu P., 1976. Le champ scientifique, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 2, 2-3, 88-104, doi: 10.3406/arss.1976.3454. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourdieu P., 1997. Les usages sociaux de la science : pour une sociologie clinique du champ scientifique, Versailles, Quæ. [Google Scholar]
  • Brundtland G.H., Gagon L., Mead H.L. (Eds), 1987. Notre avenir à tous. Rapport de la Commission mondiale sur l’environnement et le développement de l’Organisation des Nations unies, Montréal, Éditions du Fleuve. [Google Scholar]
  • Buter R.K., Van Raan A.F.J., 2012. Identification and analysis of the highly cited knowledge base of sustainability science, Sustainability Science, 8, 2, 253-267, doi: 10.1007/s11625-012-0185-1. [Google Scholar]
  • Castro Herrera G., 2000. La crisis ambiental y las tareas de la historia en América Latina, Papeles de Población, 6, 24, 37-60. [Google Scholar]
  • Connelly S., 2007. Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept, Local Environment, 12, 3, 259-278, doi: 10.1080/13549830601183289. [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza R., Stern D., Fisher B., He L., Ma C., 2004. Influential publications in ecological economics: a citation analysis, Ecological Economics, 50, 3-4, 261-292, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza R., Howarth R.B., Kubiszewski I., Liu S., Ma C., Plumecocq G., Stern D.I., 2016. Influential publications in ecological economics revisited, Ecological Economics, 123, 68-76, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crane D., 1972. Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • De Bellis N., 2009. Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics, Lanham/Toronto/Plymouth, Scarecrow Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Dryzek J.S., 2005 [1st ed. 1997]. The politics of the earth. Environmental discourses, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Eschenhagen M.L., 2012. Aproximaciones al pensamiento ambiental de Enrique Leff, Environmental Ethics, 34, Supplement, 89-95, doi: 10.5840/enviroethics201234Supplement57. [Google Scholar]
  • Escobar A., 1992. Imagining a post-development era? Critical thought, development and social movements, Social Text, 31/32, 20-56, doi: 10.2307/466217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Escobar A., 1994. Encountering development. The making and unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Estenssoro F., 2015. El ecodesarrollo como concepto precursor del desarrollo sustentable y su influencia en América Latina, Universum, 30, 1, 81-99, doi: 10.4067/S0718-23762015000100006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira L.D.C., Barbosa S.R.C.S., Hoefel J.L. de M., Guimarães R., Floriani D., Tavolaro S.B.F., 2006. Environmental issues, interdisciplinarity, social theory and intellectual production in Latin America, Ambiente & Sociedade, 9, 2, 9-24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gligo N., 2001. La dimensión ambiental en el desarrollo de América Latina, Santiago de Chile, Naciones unidas. [Google Scholar]
  • Gonçalves C.W.P., 2001. Geo-grafías. Movimientos sociales, nuevas territorialidades y sustentabilidad, México, Siglo Veintiuno. [Google Scholar]
  • Gudynas E., 1999. Concepciones de la naturaleza y desarrollo en América Latina, Persona y Sociedad, 13, 1, 101-125. [Google Scholar]
  • Gudynas E., 2011. Buen vivir: germinando alternativas al desarrollo, América Latina en movimiento, 462. [Google Scholar]
  • Gudynas E., Acosta A., 2011. El buen vivir o la disolución de la idea del progreso, in Rojas M. (Ed.), La medición del progreso y el bienestar. Propuestas desde América Latina, México, Foro consultivo científico y tecnológico de México, 103-110. [Google Scholar]
  • Guha R., Martinez-Alier J., 1997. Varieties of environmentalism: essays North and South, London, Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  • Guimarães R.P., 2003. Tierra de sombras: desafíos de la sustentabilidad y del desarrollo territorial y local ante la globalización corporativa, Santiago de Chile, Naciones unidas. [Google Scholar]
  • Hassan S.-U., Haddawy P., Zhu J., 2013. A bibliometric study of the world’s research activity in sustainable development and its sub-areas using scientific literature, Scientometrics, 99, 2, 549-579, doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1193-3. [Google Scholar]
  • Herrera A.O., Scolnik H.D., Chichilnisky G., Gallopin G.C., Hardoy J.E., Mosovich D., Oteiza E., de Romero Brest G.L., Suárez C.E., Talavera L., 1976. Catastrophe or new society?: a Latin American world model, Ottawa, International Development Research Centre. [Google Scholar]
  • Herrera A.O., Scolnik H.D., Chichilnisky G., Gallopin G.C., Hardoy J.E., Mosovich D., Oteiza E., de Romero Brest G.L., Suárez C.E., Talavera L., 2004. ¿Catastrofe o nueva sociedad? Modelo mundial latinoamericano. 30 años después, Ottawa, Centro Internacional de Investigaciones para el Dessarrolo. [Google Scholar]
  • Heyd T., 2004. Themes in Latin American environmental ethics: community, resistance and autonomy, Environmental Values, 13, 2, 223-242, doi: 10.3197/0963271041159859. [Google Scholar]
  • Heyd T., 2005. Sustainability, culture and ethics: models from Latin America, Ethics, Place & Environment, 8, 2, 223-234, doi.org/10.1080/13668790500237385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hibbard K.A., Crutzen P.J., Lambin E.F., Liverman D.M., Mantua N.J., McNeill J.R., Messerli B., Steffen W., 2007. Group report: decadal-scale interactions of humans and the environment, in Costanza R., Graumlich L.J., Steffen W.L. (Eds), Sustainability or collapse? An integrated history and future of people on earth, Cambridge, MIT Press, 341-375. [Google Scholar]
  • Hopwood B., Mellor M., O’Brien G., 2005. Sustainable development: mapping different approaches, Sustainable Development, 13, 1, 38-52, doi: 10.1002/sd.244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huanacuni Mamani F., 2010. Vivir bien/buen vivir. Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias regionales, La Paz, Instituto Internacional de Integración. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs M., 1999. Sustainable development: a contested concept, in Dobson A. (Ed.), Fairness and futurity. Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 21-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kajikawa Y., Ohno J., Takeda Y., Matsushima K., Komiyama H., 2007. Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network, Sustainability Science, 2, 2, 221-231, doi: 10.1007/s11625-007-0027-8. [Google Scholar]
  • Kajikawa Y., Tacoa F., Yamaguchi K., 2014. Sustainability science: the changing landscape of sustainability research, Sustainability Science, 9, 4, 431-438, doi: 10.1007/s11625-014-0244-x. [Google Scholar]
  • Leff E. (Ed.), 1986. Los problemas del conocimiento y la perspectiva ambiental del desarrollo, México, Siglo Veintiuno. [Google Scholar]
  • Leff E., 1994. Ecología y capital: racionalidad ambiental, democracia participativa y desarrollo sustentable, México, Siglo Veintiuno. [Google Scholar]
  • Leff E., 2004. Racionalidad ambiental. La reapropiación social de la naturaleza, México, Siglo Veintiuno. [Google Scholar]
  • Leff E., 2012. Latin American environmental thinking. A heritage of knowledge for sustainability, Environmental Ethics, 34, 4, 431-450. [Google Scholar]
  • Leff E., 2015. The power-full distribution of knowledge in political ecology. A view from the south, in Perreault T., Bridge G., McCarthy J. (Eds), The Routledge handbook of political ecology, Abingdon/New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Lélé S.M., 1991. Sustainable development: a critical review, World Development, 19, 6, 607-621, doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P. [Google Scholar]
  • Lélé S.M., 2013. Rethinking sustainable development, Current History, 112, 757, 311-316. [Google Scholar]
  • Ma C., Stern D.I., 2006. Environmental and ecological economics: a citation analysis, Ecological Economics, 58, 3, 491-506, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens W.W., 1972. The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind, New York, Universe Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Mesarović M.D., Pestel E., 1974. Mankind at the turning point. The second report to the Club of Rome, New York, Dutton. [Google Scholar]
  • Prebisch R., 1950. The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems, New York, United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  • Price D.J. de S., 1965. Networks of scientific papers, Science, 149, 3683, 510-515, doi: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510. [Google Scholar]
  • Price D.J. de S., Beaver D.D., 1966. Collaboration in an invisible college, American Psychologist, 21, 11, 1011-1018, doi: 10.1037/h0024051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Quental N., Lourenço J.M., 2012. References, authors, journals and scientific disciplines underlying the sustainable development literature: a citation analysis, Scientometrics, 90, 2, 361-381, doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0533-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Quental N., Lourenço J.M., Nunes da Silva F., 2011. Sustainable development policy: goals, targets and political cycles, Sustainable Development, 19, 1, 15-29, doi: 10.1002/sd.416. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rozzi R., 2012. South American environmental philosophy: ancestral Amerindian roots and emergent academic branches, Environmental Ethics, 34, 4, 343-366, doi: 10.5840/enviroethics201234436. [Google Scholar]
  • Sachs I., 1974a. Ambiente y estilos de desarrollo, Comercio Exterior, 24, 4, 360-368. [Google Scholar]
  • Sachs I., 1974b. Ecodesarrollo: un aporte a la definición de estilos de desarrollo para América Latina, Estudios Internacionales, 7, 25, 57-77, https://revistaei.uchile.cl/index.php/REI/article/view/17549. [Google Scholar]
  • Sachs W., 1997. Sustainable development, in Redclift M.R., Woodgate G. (Eds), The international handbook of environmental sociology, Cheltenham/Northampton, Edward Elgar, 71-82. [Google Scholar]
  • Sachs W., 1999. Planet dialectics: explorations in environment and development, London/New York, Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Schubert A., Láng I., 2005. The literature aftermath of the Brundtland report ‘Our common future’. A scientometric study based on citations in science and social science journals, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7, 1, 1-8, doi: 10.1007/s10668-003-0177-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sneddon C., Howarth R.B., Norgaard R.B., 2006. Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world, Ecological Economics, 57, 2, 253-268, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Strong M. and Experts on Development and Environment, 1971. The Founex Report, Paris, Mouton. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Opstal M., Hugé J., 2013. Knowledge for sustainable development: a worldviews perspective, Environment, Development and sustainability, 15, 3, 687-709, doi: 10.1007/s10668-012-9401-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanhulst J., 2015. El laberinto de los discursos del Buen vivir: entre Sumak Kawsay y socialismo del siglo XXI, Polis, Revista Latinoamericana, 14, 40, 233-261. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanhulst J., Beling A.E., 2013a. Buen vivir et développement durable : rupture ou continuité ? Écologie & Politique, 46, 1, 41-54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanhulst J., Beling A.E., 2013b. Buen vivir: la irrupción de América Latina en el campo gravitacional del desarrollo sostenible, Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 21, 15-28. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanhulst J., Beling A.E., 2014. Buen vivir: emergent discourse within or beyond sustainable development?, Ecological Economics, 101, 54-63, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanhulst J., Beling A.E., 2017. Esquisse pour une généalogie glocale du Buen Vivir, Synergies Chili, 13, 15-25. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanhulst J., Zaccai E., 2016. Sustainability in Latin America: an analysis of the academic discursive field, Environmental Development, 20, 68-82, doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2016.10.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Villalba B. (Ed.), 2009. Appropriations du développement durable : émergences, diffusions, traductions, Villeneuve-d’Ascq, Presses universitaires du Septentrion. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vieira P.F., Ribeiro M.A., Franco R.M., Cordeiro R.C. (Eds), 1998. Desenvolvimento e meio ambiente no Brasil: a contribuição de Ignacy Sachs, Porto Alegre/Florianópolis, Pallotti/APED. [Google Scholar]
  • Vivien F.-D., 2005. Le développement soutenable, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Wasserman S., Faust K., 1994. Social network analysis. Methods and applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • White H.D., 2011. Scientific and scholarly networks, in Scott J., Carrington P.J. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis, Los Angeles/London, SAGE, 271-285. [Google Scholar]
  • Zaccai E., 2002. Le développement durable. Dynamique et constitution d’un projet, Bruxelles, P. Lang. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.