Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 25, Number 1, January-March 2017
Dossier « L’agriculture dans le système alimentaire urbain : continuités et innovations »
Page(s) 56 - 62
Section Vie de la recherche – Research news
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2017009
Published online 24 May 2017
  • Anderies J.M., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E., 2004. A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective, Ecology and Society, 9, 1, 18, www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18/. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bélaïdi N., 2015. Théorie du droit et front écologique : apport à la (re)définition de la justice environnementale, Développement durable et territoires, 6, 1, http://developpementdurable.revues.org/10806, doi:10.4000/developpementdurable.10806. [Google Scholar]
  • Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C., 2001. Linking social-ecological systems, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Billaud J.-P., 2003. De l'objet de l'interdisciplinarité à l'interdisciplinarité autour des objets, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 11, 1, 29-36. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Crate S.A., Nutall M., 2009. Anthropology and climate change: from encounters to actions, Walnut Creek (CA), Left Coast Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Deconchat M., Gibon A., Cabanettes A., Du Bus De Warnaffe G., Hewison M., Garine E., Gavaland A., Lacombe J.-P., Ladet S., Monteil C., Ouin A., Sarthou J.-P., Sourdril A., Balent G., 2007. How to set up a research framework to analyze social and ecological interactive processes in a rural landscape, Ecology and Society, 12, 1, 15, www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art15/. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fiske S.J., Crate S.A., Crumley C.L., Galvin K., Lazrus H., Lucero L. Oliver-Smith A., Orlove B., Strauss S., Wilk R., 2014. Changing the atmosphere. Anthropology and climate change. Final report of the AAA Global Climate Change Task Force, Arlington, American Anthropological Association. [Google Scholar]
  • Folke C., 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analysis, Global Environmental Change, 16, 253-267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gragson T.L., Grove M., 2006. Social science in the context of the long term ecological research program, Society and Natural Resources, 19, 93-100. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Grimm N., Grove J., Pickett S., Redman C., 2000. Urban ecological systems present multiple challenges to ecologists − pervasive human impact and extreme heterogeneity of cities, and the need to integrate social and ecological approaches, concepts, and theory, BioScience, 50, 7, 571-584. [Google Scholar]
  • Guerbois C., Chapanda E., Fritz H., 2012. Combining multi-scale socio-ecological approaches to understand the susceptibility of subsistence farmers to elephant crop raiding on the edge of a protected area, Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 1149-1158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jollivet, M. (Ed.), 1992. Sciences de la nature, sciences de la société. Les passeurs de frontières, Paris, CNRS Éditions, http://books.openedition.org/editionscnrs/4154. [Google Scholar]
  • Jollivet M., Legay J.-M., 2005. Canevas pour une réflexion sur une interdisciplinarité entre sciences de la nature et sciences sociales, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13, 2, 184-188. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Mathieu N., Rivault C., Blanc N., Cloarec A., 1997. Le dialogue interdisciplinaire mis à l'épreuve : réflexions à partir d'une recherche sur les blattes urbaines, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 5, 1, 18-30. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Niemi G.J., McDonald M.E., 2004. Application of ecological indicators, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, 89-111. [Google Scholar]
  • Parsons M., Godøy Ø., LeDrew E., de Bruin T., Danis B., Tomlinson S., Carlson D., 2011. A conceptual framework for managing very diverse data for complex, interdisciplinary science, Journal of Information Science, 37, 6, 555-569. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riaux J., 2013. Engager la construction d'un regard sociohydrologique : des archives catalyseurs de l'interdisciplinarité, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 21, 1, 15-23. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Roncoli K.T., Ingram K., Kirshen P., 2001. The cost and risk with copying the drought. Livelihood impact and farmers' responses in Burkina Faso, Climate research, 19, 2, 119-132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sievanen L., Campbell L., Leslie H., 2012. Challenges to interdisciplinary research in ecosystem-based management, Conservation Biology, 26, 2, 315-323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sourdril A., Andrieu E., Cabanettes A., Elyakime B., Ladet S., 2012. How to maintain domesticity of usages in small rural forests? Lessons from forest management continuity through a French case study, Ecology and Society, 17, 2, 6, www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss2/art6/. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Veteto J., Carlson S., 2014. Climate change and apple diversity: local perception from Appalachian North Carolina, Journal of Ethnobiology, 34, 3, 359-382, doi:10.2993/0278-0771-34.3.359. [Google Scholar]
  • Vigour C., 2005. La comparaison dans les sciences sociales, Paris, La Découverte. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.