Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 24, Number 1, January-March 2016
Page(s) 15 - 23
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2016005
Published online 20 April 2016
  • Becker H.S., 1998. Les ficelles du métier. Comment conduire sa recherche en sciences sociales, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Benhamou F., Mermet L., 2003. Stratégie et géopolitique de l’opposition à la conservation de la nature : le cas de l’ours des Pyrénées, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 11, 4, 381-393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blickley J.L., Deiner K., Garbah K., Lacher I., Meek M.H., Prensky L.M., Wilkerson M., Winford E.M., Schwartz M.W., 2013. Graduate student’s guide to necessary skills for nonacademic conservation careers, Conservation Biology, 27, 1, 24-34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brewer C., 2006. Translating data into meaning: education in conservation biology, Conservation Biology, 20, 3, 689-691. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cannon J.R., Dietz J.M., Dietz L.A., 1996. Training conservation biologists in human interaction skills, Conservation Biology, 10, 4, 1277-1282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cundill G., Cumming G.S., Biggs D., Fabricius C., 2011. Soft systems thinking and social learning for adaptive management, Conservation Biology, 26, 1, 13-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniellou F., Laville A., Teigner C., 1983. Fiction et réalité du travail ouvrier. Les cahiers français, 209, 33-45. [Google Scholar]
  • Dejours C., 2001. Subjectivité, travail et action, La pensée, 328, 7-19. [Google Scholar]
  • Dejours C., 2013. Travail vivant (1) : sexualité et travail, Paris, Payot et Rivages. [Google Scholar]
  • Denayer D., 2013. Produire des connaissances, prendre soin, vivre avec et rendre compte. Une analyse comparée des compétences des acteurs de la conservation de la faune. Thèse de doctorat, Liège, Université de Liège. [Google Scholar]
  • Granjou C., Mauz I., 2012. Des espaces frontières d’expérimentation entre pastoralisme et protection de la nature, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 20, 3, 310-317. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobson S.K., Duff M.D., 1998. Training idiot savants: the lack of human dimensions in conservation biology, Conservation Biology, 12, 2, 263-267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mascia M.B., Brosius J.P., Dobson T.A., Forbes B.C., Horowitz L., McKean M.A., Turner N.J., 2003. Conservation and the social sciences, Conservation Biology, 17, 3, 649-650. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Muir M.J., Schwartz M.W., 2009. Academic research training for a nonacademic workplace: a case study of graduate student alumni who work in conservation, Conservation Biology, 23, 6, 1357-1368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Noss R.F., 1997. The failure of universities to produce conservation biologists, Conservation Biology, 11, 6, 1267-1269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Orr D.W., 1999. Education, careers, and callings: the practice of conservation biology, Conservation Biology, 13, 6, 1242-1245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reyers B., Roux D.J., Cowling R.M., Ginsburg A.E., Nel J.L., O’Farrell P., 2010. Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process, Conservation Biology, 24, 4, 957-965. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sandberg J., Tsoukas H., 2011. Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality, Academy of Management Review, 36, 2, 338-360. [Google Scholar]
  • Schwartz Y., 2007. Un bref aperçu de l’histoire culturelle du concept d’activité, activités, 4, 2, 122-133, http://www.activites.org/v4n2/schwartz-FR.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Schwartz Y., 2010. Connaître et étudier le travail, Ergologia, 3, 93-104. [Google Scholar]
  • Star S.L., Strauss A., 1999. Layers of silence, arenas of voice: the ecology of visible and invisible work, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 1-2, 9-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Teel T.L., Manfredo M.J., 2010. Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation, Conservation Biology, 24, 1, 128-139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.