Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 23, 2015
Les enjeux de la conférence de Paris. Penser autrement la question climatique
Page(s) S6 - S18
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015014
Published online 22 June 2015
  • Agarwal, A., Narain, S., 1991. Global Warming in an Inequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism, New Dehli, Center for Science and Environment. [Google Scholar]
  • Agrawala, S., 1998. Context and early origins of the Intergovernmental panel of climate change, Climatic Change, 39, 605-620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aykut, S., Dahan, A., 2011. Le régime climatique avant et après Copenhague : sciences, politiques et l’objectif des deux degrés, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19, 2, 144-157. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Aykut, S., Comby, J.-B., Guillemot, H., 2012. Climate change controversies in French mass media 1990-2010, Journalism Studies, 13, 2, 157-174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aykut, S., Dahan, A., 2014. La gouvernance du changement climatique : anatomie d’un schisme de réalité, in Pestre, D. (Ed.), Le Gouvernement des technosciences, Paris, La Découverte, p. 78-109. [Google Scholar]
  • Aykut, S., Dahan, A., 2015. Gouverner le Climat ? Vingt ans de négociations internationales, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck, S., Borie, M., Chilvers, J., Esguerra, A., Heubach, K., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., Lövbrand, E., Marquard, E., Miller, C., Nadim, T., Nesshoever, C., Settele, J., Turnhout, E., Vasileiadou, E., Goerg, C., 2014. Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise: The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES, Gaia, 23, 2, 80-87. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonneuil, C., Fressoz, J.-B., 2013. L'événement Anthropocène : la Terre, l'histoire et nous, Paris, Le Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  • Bony, S., Stevens, B., Held, I., Mitchell, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Emanuel, K., Friedlingstein, P., Griffies, S., Senior, C., 2011. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: Perspectives on a Scientific Assessment, in Asrar, G., Hurrel, J. (Ed.), Monograph on Climate Science for Serving Society: Research, Modelling and Prediction Priorities, Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Buffet, C., 2015. L’adaptation au changement climatique : constructions, cadrages et acteurs, des arènes globales aux populations vulnérables : Bangladesh. Thèse pour obtenir le titre de docteur de l’EHESS (en préparation). École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Dahan, A., 2008. Climate expertise: Between scientific credibility and geopolitical imperatives, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33, 1, 71-81. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Dahan, A., 2010. Putting the earth system in a numerical box? The evolution from climate modeling toward global change, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 282-292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dahan, A., 2014. L’impasse de la gouvernance climatique : pour un nouvel ordre de gouvernementalité, Critique Internationale, 62, 21-37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dahan, A., Guillemot, H., 2006. Le changement climatique : dynamiques scientifiques, expertise, enjeux géopolitiques, Revue de Sociologie du Travail, 48, 3, 412-432. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Dahan, A., Buffet, C., Viard-Crétat, A., 2011. Le compromis de Cancún : vertu du pragmatisme ou masque de l'immobilisme ? Rapport de recherche, Koyré Climate Series, 3. [Google Scholar]
  • Demeritt, D., 2001. The construction of global warming and the politics of science, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, 2, 307-337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dessai, S., Hulme, M., Lempert, R., Pielke Jr., R.A., 2009. Do we need better predictions to adapt to a changing climate?, EOS, 90, 13, 111-112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Grevsmühl, S., 2014. La Terre vue d’en haut : l’invention de l’environnement global, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  • Guillemot, H., 2014a. Les désaccords sur le changement climatique : au-delà d’un climat bipolaire, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 22, 4, 340-350. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillemot, H., 2014b. Comprendre le climat pour le prévoir ? Sur quelques débats, stratégies et pratiques de climatologues modélisateurs, in Varenne, F., Silberstein, M. (Ed.), Modéliser et simuler : épistémologies et pratiques de la modélisation et de la simulation, Tome 2, Paris, Éditions Matériologiques. [Google Scholar]
  • Gusfield, J., 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-driving and the Symbolic Order, Chicago, Chicago University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Haas, P., 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organisation, 46(1), 1-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hache, E. (Ed.), 2014. De l'univers clos au monde infini, Paris, Éditions Dehors. [Google Scholar]
  • Hamilton, C., 2012. Nous sommes tous des climato-sceptiques, in Zaccaï, E., Gemenne, F., Decroly, J.-M. (Eds.), Controverses climatiques, sciences et politique, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 221-243. [Google Scholar]
  • Howe, J., 2014. Behind the Curve: Science and the Politics of Global Warming, Seattle, University of Washington press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme, M., 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme, M., 2011. Reducing the future to climate: A story of climate determinism and reductionism, Osiris, 26, 1, 245-266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme, M., 2012. What sorts of knowledge for what sort of politics? Science, climate change and the challenge of democracy. Working Paper, Science, Society and Sustainability (3S) Research Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme, M., Mahony, M., 2010. Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC?, Progress in Physical Geography, 34, 5, 1-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S., 1987. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science, Social Studies of Science, 17, 2, 195-230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jordan, A., Rayner, T., Schroeder, H., Adger, N., Anderson, K., Bows, A., Le Quéré, C., Joshi, M., Mander, S., Vaughan, N., Whitmarsh, L., 2013. Going beyond two degrees? The risks and opportunities of alternative options, Climate Policy, 13, 6, 751-769. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lahsen, M., 2008. Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist ‘trio’ supporting the backlash against global warming, Global Environmental Change, 18, 204-219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern, Critical Inquiry, 30, 2, 225-248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 2014. in Hache, E. (Ed.), De l'univers clos au monde infini, Paris, Éditions Dehors. [Google Scholar]
  • Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., Vasileiadou, E., 2015. Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene, Global Environmental Change, 32. [Google Scholar]
  • McCright, A., Dunlap, R., 2000. Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims, Social Problems, 47, 4, 227-48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miller, C., 2004. Climate science and the making of a global political order, in Jasanoff, S. (Ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Mooney, H., Duraiappah, A., Larigauderie, A., 2013. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs, PNAS, 110, 3665-3672. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Oreskes, N., Conway, E., 2010. Merchands of doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, London, Bloomsbury Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pielke Jr., R.A., 2002. Policy, politics and perspective, Nature, 416, 368. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pottier, A., 2014. L'économie dans l'impasse climatique : développement matériel, théorie immatérielle et utopie auto-stabilisatrice. Thèse d’économie pour obtenir le titre de docteur de l’EHESS, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Prins, G., Galiana, I., Green, C., Grundmann, R., Hulme, M., Korhala, A., Laird, F., Nordhaus, T., Pielke Jr, R., Rayner, S., Sarewitz, D., Shellenberger, M., Stehr, N., Hiroyuki, T., 2010. The Hartwell Paper. A new direction for climate policy after the crash of 2009. Joint Research Paper of the Institute for Science, Innovation and Society and the MacKinder Programme for the Study of Long-Wave Events, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Rockström, J., et al., 2009. A safe operating space for humanity, Nature, 461, 472-475 (online: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7263/full/461472a.html). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Roqueplo, P., 1997. Entre savoir et décision, l’expertise scientifique, Paris, Éditions de l’Inra. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarewitz, D., 2000. Science and environmental policy: An excess of objectivity, in Frodeman, R. (Ed.), Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ), 79-98. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarewitz, D., 2011. Does climate change knowledge really matter?, WIREs Clim Change, 2, 475-481. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shackley, S., Wynne, B., 1996. Representing uncertaintity in global climate change and policy: Boundary ordering devices and authority, Science, Technology and Human Values, 21, 3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shackley, S., Risbey, J., Stone, P., Wynne, B., 1999. Adjusting to policy expectations in climate change modeling: An interdisciplinary study of flux adjustments in coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models, Climatic Change, 43, 413-454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shellenberger, M., Nordhaus, T., 2011. The long death of environmentalism, The Breakthrough, 25 February 2011 (online: http://thebreakthrough.org/archive/the_long_death_of_environmenta). [Google Scholar]
  • Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., McNeill, J., 2011. The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 1938, 842-867. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stocker, T., Plattner, G.-K., 2014. Rethinking IPCC Reports, Nature, 513, 7517, 163-165. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor, P., Buttel, F., 1992. How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalisation of environmental discourse, Geoforum, 23, 3, 1-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Uhrqvist, U., Lövbrand, E., 2014. Rendering the earth system problematic: The constitutive power of global change research in the IGBP and the IHDP, Environmental Politics, 23, 2, 339-356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Victor, D., 2014. Copenhagen II or something new, Nature Climate Change, 4, 10, 853-855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Victor, D., Kennel, C.F., 2014. Climate policy: Ditch the 2 °C warming goal, Nature, 514, 7520, 30-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne, B., 1982. Rationality and ritual: The Windscale inquiry and nuclear decisions in Britain, Bucks (UK), The British Society for the History of Science. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.