Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 22, Number 1, janvier-mars 2014
Page(s) 3 - 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2014016
Published online 07 April 2014
  • [n.s.], 2009. Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document No. 24, River basin management in a changing climate, European communities (online : http://www.sednet.org/download/directive_climate_adaptation_management_climate.pdf).
  • Anderson, T., Leal, L., 1991. Free Market Environmentalism, Boulder (CO), Westview Press.
  • Balée, W., 1998. Advances in Historical Ecology, New York, Columbia University Press.
  • Bezes, P., 2005. Le renouveau du contrôle des bureaucraties : l’impact du New Public Management, Informations Sociales, 126, 26-37.
  • Borja, A., Rodríguez, J.G., 2010. Problems associated with the “one-out, all-out” principle, when using multiple ecosystem components in assessing the ecological status of marine waters, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 8, 1143-1146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Bouleau, G., 2006. Le débat sur la qualité de l’eau : comment des données peuvent devenir des indicateurs ?, Ingénieries EAT, 47, 29-36.
  • Bouleau, G., 2007. La gestion française des rivières et ses indicateurs à l'épreuve de la directive cadre. Thèse de doctorat, AgroParisTech, Engref, Paris.
  • Bouleau, G., Argillier, C., Souchon, Y., Barthélémy, C., Babut, M., 2009. How ecological indicators construction reveals social changes: The case of lakes and rivers in France, Ecological Indicators, 9, 6, 1198-1205. [CrossRef]
  • Bruno, I., Jacquot, S., Mandin, L., 2006. Europeanization through its instrumentation: Benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination… Toolbox or Pandora’s box?, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 4, 519-536. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Buisson, L., Grenouillet, G., 2009. Contrasted impacts of climate change on stream fish assemblages along an environmental gradient, Diversity and Distributions, 15, 4, 613-626. [CrossRef]
  • Cini, M., 1996. La Commission européenne : lieu d’émergence de cultures administratives. L’exemple de la DG IV et de la DG XI, Revue Française de Science Politique, 46, 3, 457-473. [CrossRef]
  • Clements, F.E., 1905. Research Methods in Ecology, Lincoln (NE), University Printing.
  • Clements, F.E., 1936. Nature and structure of the climax, Journal of Ecology, 24, 1, 252-284. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Collins, K., Earnshaw, D., 1992. The implementation and enforcement of European community environment legislation, Environmental Politics, 1, 4, 213-249. [CrossRef]
  • Commission of the European Communities, 1994. Proposal for a Council Directive on the ecological quality of water. COM (93), 94/0152 SYN, Brussels (online : http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:1994:222:FULL:EN:PDF).
  • Davies, S.P., Jackson, S.K., 2006. The biological condition gradient: A descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems, Ecological Applications, 16, 4, 1251-1266. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Dehousse, R., 2004. La méthode ouverte de coordination : quand l’instrument tient lieu de politique, in Lascoumes, P., Galès, P.L. (Eds), Gouverner par les instruments, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 331-356.
  • Depraz, S., 2007. Campagnes et naturalité : la redéfinition d’un rapport à la nature dans les espaces ruraux des nouveaux Länder allemands, Revue d’Études Comparatives Est-Ouest, 38, 3, 35-152.
  • Douglas, M., 1999. Comment pensent les institutions, Paris, La découverte, Mauss.
  • Dufour, S., Piégay, H., 2009. From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: Forget natural references and focus on human benefits, River Research and Applications, 25, 5, 568-581. [CrossRef]
  • EEA, 1995. Inland Waters - Europe's Environment: The Dobris Assessment 1994 (chapter 5), European Environmental Agency (online: http://www.aughty.org/pdf/dobris.pdf).
  • Egan, D., Howell, E.A., 2001. The Historical Ecology Handbook: A Restorationist’s Guide on Reference Ecosystems, Washington, Island Press.
  • Elton, C., 1930. Animal Ecology and Evolution, Oxford (UK), Clarendon Press.
  • Fernandez, S., Bouleau, G., Treyer, S., 2011. Reconsidérer la prospective sur l’eau en Europe dans ses dimensions politiques, Développement Durable et Territoires, 2, 3.
  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., 1997. On the development of concept and methodology of society’s metabolism, Abteilung Soziale Ökologie (version anglaise), 57, Interuniversitäres Institut für interdisziplinäre Forschung und Fortbildung.
  • Friberg, N., Bonada, N., Bradley, D.C., Dunbar, M.J., Edwards, F.K., Grey, J., Hayes, R.B., Hildrew, A.G., Lamouroux, N., Trimmer, M., Woodward, G., 2011. Biomonitoring of human impacts in freshwater ecosystems: The good, the bad, and the ugly, Advances in Ecological Research, 44, 1-68. [CrossRef]
  • Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press.
  • Henri, C.P., Amoros, C., 1995. Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: I. A scientific base, Environmental Management, 19, 891-902. [CrossRef]
  • Hering, D., Borja, A., Carstensen, J., Carvalho, L., Elliott, M., Feld, C.K., Heiskanen, A.-S., Johnson, R.K., Moe, J., Pont, D., Lyche Solheim, A., van de Bund, W., 2010. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: A critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future, Science of the Total Environment, 408, 19, 4007-4019. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Holling, C., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 4, 1-23. [CrossRef]
  • Hughes, F.M.R., Colston, A., Mountford, J.O., 2005. Restoring riparian ecosystems: The challenge of accommodating variability and designing restoration trajectories, Ecology and Society, 10, 1, 12.
  • Hughes, R.M., Larsen, D.P., 1988. Ecoregions : An approach to surface water protection, Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 60, 486-493.
  • Jungwirth, M., Muha, S., Schmutz, S. (Eds), 2000. Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters. Proceedings of the International Conference held in Vienna, Austria, 9-11 November 1998 (reprinted from Hydrobiologia, 422-423), Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Kaika, M., Page, B., 2003. The EU Water Framework Directive: European policy making and the changing topography of lobbying (part 1), European Environment, 13, 6, 314-327. [CrossRef]
  • Karr, J.R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities, Fisheries, 6, 6, 21-27. [CrossRef]
  • Kern, K., 1992. Rehabilitation of streams in South-West Germany, in Boon, P.J., Calow, P., Petts, G.E. (Eds), River Conservation and Management, Chichester (UK), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 321-336.
  • Lapierre, J.-W., 1992. L'Analyse des systèmes : l'application aux sciences sociales, Paris, Syros.
  • Launois, L., Veslot, J., Irz, P., Argillier, C., 2011. Selecting fish-based metrics responding to human pressures in French natural lakes and reservoirs: Towards the development of a fish-based index (FBI) for French lakes, Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 20, 1, 120-132. [CrossRef]
  • Le Floch, S., 2005. La « fermeture du paysage » : au-delà du phénomène, petite chronique d’une construction sociale, L'Espace Géographique, 34, 1, 49-64.
  • Lévêque, C., van der Leeuw, S. (Eds), 2003. Quelle nature voulons-nous ? Pour une approche socio-écologique du champ de l'environnement, Paris, Elsevier.
  • Loupsans, D., Gramaglia, C., 2011. L’expertise sous tensions : cultures épistémiques et politiques à l’épreuve de l’écriture de la directive cadre européenne sur l’eau, L'Europe en Formation, Centre international de formation européenne, 3, 361, 87-114. [CrossRef]
  • Majone, G., 1996. La Communauté européenne : un État régulateur, Paris, Montchrestien.
  • Marzin, A., Archaimbault, V., Belliard, J., Chauvin, C., Delmas, F., Pont, D., 2012. Ecological assessment of running waters: Do macrophytes, macroinvertebrates, diatoms and fish show similar responses to human pressures?, Ecological Indicators, 23, 56-65. [CrossRef]
  • Mondy, C.P., Villeneuve, B., Archaimbault, V., Usseglio-Polatera, P., 2012. A new macroinvertebrate-based multimetric index (I2M2) to evaluate ecological quality of French wadeable streams fulfilling the WFD demands: A taxonomical and trait approach, Ecological Indicators, 18, 452-467. [CrossRef]
  • Moss, B., 2008. The Water Framework Directive: Total environment or political compromise ?, Science of the Total Environment, 400, 1-3, 32-41. [CrossRef]
  • Newman, P.J., Piavaux, M.A., Sweeting, R.A. (Eds), 1992. River water quality ecological assessment and control. Proceedings of the International Conference on River Quality - Ecological Assessment and Control, Brussels, 16 december 1991, Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, No.14606.
  • Nilsson, C., Jansson, R., Malmqvist, B., Naiman, R.J., 2007. Restoring riverine landscapes: The challenge of identifying priorities, reference states, and techniques, Ecology and Society, 12, 1 (online : http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art16/).
  • O’Neill, R.V., 2001. Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (with full military honors, of course!), Ecology, 82, 12, 3275-3284.
  • OCDE, 1994. Indicateurs d'environnement : Corps central de l'OCDE, Paris, OCDE.
  • OCDE, 1995. La gestion publique en mutation : les réformes dans les pays de l'OCDE, Paris, OCDE.
  • Odum, E.P., 1953. Fundamentals of Ecology, Philadelphia (PA), W. B. Saunders.
  • OECD, 1993. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews, Paris, OECD Environment Monographs No. 83.
  • Omernik, J.M., 1987. Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77, 1, 118-125. [CrossRef]
  • Perrin, B., 2006. Moving from Outputs to Outcomes: Practical Advice from Governments Around the World, Washington, World Bank, IBM Center for the Business of Government.
  • Pimm, S.L., 1984. The complexity and stability of ecosystems, Nature, 307, 321-326. [CrossRef]
  • Pont, D. (Ed.), 2006. Conséquences du changement global sur la distribution et la démographie du Chabot (Cottus gobio) : une approche intégrative, Paris, Institut français de la biodiversité, MEDD-GICC.
  • Pont, D. (Ed.), 2011. Water Framework Directive. Intercalibration Phase 2: River Fish European Intercalibration Group. Final Report to ECOSTAT, European Commission Directorate General Joint Research Centre.
  • Pont, D., Hugueny, B., Beier, U., Goffaux, D., Melcher, A., Noble, R., Rogers, C., Roset, N., Schmutz, S., 2006. Assessing river biotic condition at the continental scale: A European approach using functional metrics and fish assemblages, Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 70-80. [CrossRef]
  • Pont, D., Hugueny, B., Rogers, C., 2007. Development of a fish-based index for the assessment of “river health” in Europe: The European Fish Index (EFI), Fisheries Management and Ecology, 14, 427-439. [CrossRef]
  • Pont, D., Piégay, H., Farinetti, A., Allain, S., Landon, N., Liébault, F., Dumont, B., Richard-Mazet, A., 2009. Conceptual framework and interdisciplinary approach for the sustainable management of gravel-bed rivers: The case of the Drôme River basin (S.E. France), Aquatic Ecology, 71, 356-370.
  • Richardson, J., 1994. EU water policy: Uncertain agendas, shifting networks and complex coalitions, Environmental Politics, 3, 4, 139-167. [CrossRef]
  • Salais, R., 2004. La politique des indicateurs : du taux de chômage au taux d’emploi dans la stratégie européenne pour l’emploi (SEE), in Zimmermann, B. (Ed.), Action publique et sciences sociales, Paris, Maison des sciences de l’homme.
  • Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C., Walker, B., 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Nature, 413, 11, 591-596. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Schmutz, S., Kaufmann, M., Vogel, B., Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., 2000. A multi-level concept for fish-based, river-type-specific assessment of ecological integrity, in Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., Schmutz, S. (Eds), Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 279-289.
  • Steyaert, P., Ollivier, G., 2007. The European Water Framework Directive: How ecological assumptions frame technical and social change, Ecology and Society, 12, 1, 25 (online : http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art25/).
  • Stoddard, J.L., Larsen, D.P., Hawkins, C.P., Johnson, R.K., Norris, R.H., 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: The concept of reference condition, Ecological Applications, 16, 4, 1267-1276. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Suding, K.N., Gross, K.L., Houseman, G.R., 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 1, 46-53. [CrossRef]
  • Swetnam, T.W., Allen, C.D., Betancourt, J.L., 1999. Applied historical ecology: Using the past to manage the future, Ecological Applications, 9, 4, 1189-1206. [CrossRef]
  • Tansley, A.G., 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms, Ecology, 16, 3, 284-307. [CrossRef]
  • U.S. House of Representatives, 1972. Report of the Committee on Public Works, United States House of Representatives, with additional and supplemental views. H.R. 11896 to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 92nd Congress, 2nd session, House Report 92-911, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.
  • Van de Bund, W., Caroni, R., 2012. Combination of Biological Quality Elements towards complete water body assessment. Oral communication, WISER Final Conference “Current Questions in Water Management”, Tallinn, Estonia, 25-26 January.
  • Wallin, M., Wiederholm, T., Johnson, R.K., 2003. Final guidance on establishing reference conditions and ecological status class boundaries for inland surface waters EU Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) for the Water Framework Directive, CIS Working Group 2.3, REFCOND (online : http://www.minenv.gr/pinios/00/odhgia/7th_draft_refcond_final.pdf).
  • Whittaker, R.H., 1975. Communities and Ecosystems, New York, Macmillan Publishing Co.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.