Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 21, Number 3, juillet-septembre 2013
Page(s) 271 - 281
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2013098
Published online 14 November 2013
  • Abraham, J., Reed, T., 2002. Progress, innovation and regulatory science in drug development: The politics of international standard-setting, Social Studies of Science, 32, 3, 337-369. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Anses, 2011. Effets sanitaires du bisphénol A et Connaissances relatives aux usages du bisphénol A. Rapports de l’Anses. [Google Scholar]
  • Arnold, S.F., Klotz, D.M., Collins, B.M., Vonier, P.M., Guillette Jr., L.J., McLachlan, J.A., 1996. Synergistic activation of estrogen receptor with combinations of environmental chemicals, Science, 272, 1489-1492. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Barbier, G., 2011. Perturbateurs endocriniens, le temps de la précaution. Rapport de l’Office parlementaire d’évaluation des choix scientifiques et technologiques, 765. [Google Scholar]
  • Barker, D.J., Winter, P.D., Osmond, C., Margetts, B., Simmonds, S.J., 1989. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease, Lancet, 9, 577-580. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Blair, A., Saracci, R., Vineis, P., Cocco, P., Forastiere, F., Grandjean, P., Kogevinas, M., Kriebel, D., McMichael, A., Pearce, N., Porta, M., Samet, J., Sandler, D.P., Seniori Costantini, A., Vainio, H., 2009. Epidemiology, public health and the rhetoric of false positives, Environmental Health Perspectives, 2009, 117, 12, 1809-1813. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boekelheide, K., Campion, S. N., 2010. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: Using the new toxicity testing paradigm to create a taxonomy of adverse effects, Toxicological Sciences, 114, 1, 20-24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boffetta, P., McLaughlin, J.K., La Vecchia, C., Tarone, R.E., Lipworth, L., Blot, W.J., 2008. False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: A plea for epistemological modesty, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100, 988-995. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boffetta, P., McLaughlin, J.K., La Vecchia, C., Tarone, R.E., Lipworth, L., Blot, W.J., 2009. Re: False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: A plea for epistemological modesty, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101, 3, 213-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boudia, S., 2007. Naissance, extinction et rebonds d’une controverse scientifique : les dangers de la radioactivité pendant la guerre froide, Mil Neuf Cent, Revue d’Histoire Intellectuelle, 25, 157-170. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudia, S., 2011. Les cadres de l’expertise à l’épreuve des expositions aux faibles doses. Programme ANR 2008-2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2012. Special issue on the risks of exposure to low-level radiation, 68, 3, 10-83. [Google Scholar]
  • Calvert, J., Fujimura, J.H., 2011. Calculating life? Duelling discourses in interdisciplinary systems biology, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Life Sciences, 42, 155-163. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Ceri, 2003. Étude des effets sanitaires de l’exposition aux faibles doses de radiation ionisante à des fins de radioprotection. Recommandations du Comité européen sur le risque de l’irradiation, Paris, Frison-Roche. [Google Scholar]
  • Chateauraynaud F., 2011. Argumenter dans un champ de forces : essai de balistique sociologique, Paris, Pétra. [Google Scholar]
  • Chateauraynaud F., Debaz J., 2010. Le partage de l’hypersensible : le surgissement des électro-hypersensibles dans l’’espace public, Sciences Sociales et Santé, 28, 3, 5-33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chateauraynaud F., Debaz J., Fintz M., 2011. La dose fait-elle toujours le poison ? Une analyse sociologique des mondes de la recherche et de l’expertise à l’épreuve des faibles doses, document de recherche Anses/GSPR (http://gspr.ehess.free.fr/documents/rapports/RAP-2011-ANSES- FADO.pdf, consulté le 06/09/13). [Google Scholar]
  • Diamanti-Kandarakis E., Bourguignon, J.P., Giudice, L.C., Hauser, R., Prins, G.S., Soto, A.M., Zoeller, R.T., Gore, A.C., 2009, Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: An Endocrine Society scientific statement, Endocrine Reviews, 30, 4, 293-342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fagnani, F., Nicolon, A., 1979. Nucléopolis : matériaux pour l’analyse d’une société nucléaire, Grenoble, Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaudillière, J.-P., Löwy, I., 2005. Science, markets and public health: Contemporary testing for breast cancer predispositions, in Berridge V., Loughin K. (Eds), Medicine, the Market and the Mass Media: Producing Health in the Twentieth Century, London, Routledge, 266-87. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilbert, S., Epel, D., 2009. Ecological Developmental Biology: Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine and Evolution, Sunderland (MA), Sinauer Associates Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilbert, S., 2011. The decline of soft inheritance, in Gissis, S., Jablonka, E. (Eds), Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, 121-125. [Google Scholar]
  • Gissis, S., Jablonka, E. (Eds), 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Grandjean, P., 2008. Seven deadly sins of environmental epidemiology and the virtues of precaution, Epidemiology, 19, 1, 158-162. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grandjean, P., Perez, M., 2008. Developmental neurotoxicity: Implications of mercury research, International Journal of Environment and Health, 2, 3-4, 417-428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hartung, T., 2011. From alternative methods to a new toxicology, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 77, 3, 338-349, doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jas, N., 2007. Public Health and pesticide regulation in France before and after Silent Spring, History and Technology, 23, 4, 369-388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jégou, B., Jouannet, P., Spira, A., 2009. La fertilité est-elle en danger ?, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Kahn, J., 2008. Exploiting race in drug development: BiDil’s interim model of pharmacogenomics, Social Studies of Science, 35, 5, 737-758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Knorr-Cetina, K.D., 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Kortenkamp, A., Backhaus, T., Faust, M., 2009. State of the Art Report on Mixture Toxicity. Report for Directorate General for the Environment of the European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  • Kortenkamp, A., Martin, O., Faust, M., Evans, R., McKinlay, R., Orton, F., Rosivatz, E., 2011. State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters: Final Report. Report to the Commission of the European Union (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/endocrine/documents/4_SOTA%20EDC%20Final% 20Report%20V3%206%20Feb%2012.pdf, consulté le 06/09/13). [Google Scholar]
  • Krimsky, S., 2000. Hormonal Chaos: The Scientific and Social Origins of the Environmental Endocrine Hypothesis, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuhn, T.S., 1983. La Structure des révolutions scientifiques, Paris, Champs Flammarion. [Google Scholar]
  • Langston, N., 2010. Toxic Bodies: Hormone Disruptors and the Legacy of DES, New Haven, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence, C., Weisz, G. (Eds), 1998. Greater Than the Parts: Holism in Biomedicine, 1920-1950, New York, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Löwy, I., 1990. The strength of loose concepts - boundary concepts, federative experimental strategies and disciplinary growth: The case of immunology, History of Science, 30, 90, 371-396. [Google Scholar]
  • Marty, M.S., Carney, E.W., Rowlands, J.C., 2011. Endocrine disruption: Historical perspectives and its impact on the future of toxicology testing, Toxicological Sciences, 120(S1), S93-S108. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • McLachlan, J. A., 1997. Synergistic effect of environmental estrogens: Report withdrawn, Science, 277, 462-463. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Melnick, R., Lucier, G., Wolfe, M., Hall, R., Stancel, G., Prins, G., Gallo, M., Reuhl, K., Ho, S.-M., Brown, T., Moore, J., Leakey, J., Haseman, J., Kohn, M., 2002. Summary of the National Toxicology Program’s report of the endocrine disruptors low-dose peer review, Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 4, 427-431. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Myers, J.P., Zoeller, R.T., vom Saal, F.S., 2009. A clash of old and new scientific concepts in toxicity, with important implications for public health, Environmental Health Perspectives, 117, 11, 1652-1655, doi:10.1289/ehp.0900887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • NRC, 2007. Testing Toxicity in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy, Washington, The National Academy Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearson, H., 2011. Study of a lifetime, Nature, 471, 20-24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rheinberger H.-J., 1997. Towards a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford (CA), Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Society of Toxicology, Environmental Mutagen Society, Teratology Society, 2011. Toxicologists welcome assessment assistance, Science, 332, 536. [Google Scholar]
  • Star, S. L., Griesemer, J., 1989. Institutional ecology, "translations", and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-1939, Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • The American Society of Human Genetics, The American Society for Reproductive Medicine, The Endocrine Society, The Genetics Society of America, The Society for Developmental Biology, The Society for Pediatric Urology, The Society for the Study of Reproduction, and The Society for Gynecologic Investigation, 2011. Assessing chemical risk: Societies offer expertise, Science, 331, 1136. [Google Scholar]
  • Thébaud-Mony, A., 2008. Travailler peut nuire gravement à votre santé, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Vandenberg, L. N., Colborn, T., Hayes, T.B., Heindel, J.J., Jacobs Jr., D.R., Lee, D.-H., Shioda, T., Soto, A.M.,vom Saal, F.S.,Welshons, W.V., Zoeller, R.T., Myers, J.-P., 2012. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses, Endocrine Reviews, 33, 3 (http://edrv.endojournals.org/content/early/2012/03/14/er.2011-1050.abstract, consulté le 06/09/13). [Google Scholar]
  • Vom Saal, F.S., Akingbemi, B.T., Belcher, S.M., Birnbaum, L.S., Crain, D.A., Farabollini, F., Guillette, L.J., Hauser, R., Heindel J.J., Ho, S-M., 2007. Chapel hill Bisphenol A panel consensus statement: Integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure, Reproductive Toxicology, 24, 2, 131-138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wandall, B., Hansson, S.O., Rudén, C., 2007. Bias in toxicology, Archives in Toxicology, 81, 605-617. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wild, C., Cogliano, V., 2010. Letter to the editor: A plea on behalf of expert evaluation and the experts involved, International Journal of Epidemiology, 1, 1, doi:10.1093/ije/dyq038. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.