Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 19, Number 2, avril-juin 2011
Page(s) 144 - 157
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011144
Published online 25 August 2011
  • Allison, I., Bindoff, N.L., Bindschadler, P.M., et al., 2009. The Copenhagen Diagnosis 2009: Updating the World on the Latest Climate Science, Syndey, The University of New South Wales Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC).
  • Armatte, M., 2008. Climate change: Scenarios and integrated modelling, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33, 1, 37-50. [CrossRef]
  • Beck, U., 2001 [éd. orig. 1986]. La Société du risque : sur la voie d’une autre modernité, Paris, Aubier.
  • Beck, U., 2010. Climate for change, or How to create a green modernity?, Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 2-3, 254-266. [CrossRef]
  • Bolin, B., Houghton, J.T., Filho, L.G.M., et al., 1995. IPCC Second Assessment: Climate Change 1995. A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, WMO/UNEP, Geneva (http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml).
  • Cartagena Dialogue, 2010 [Chairman’s statement Costa Rica], Third Meeting of the Cartagena Dialogue for Progressive Action, San Jose, Costa Rica, 31 october-2 november (http://www.minae.go.cr/ejes_estrategicos/ambiente/cambio_climatico.html)
  • Charney, J.G., Arakawa, A., Bolin, B., et al., 1979. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. Report of an Ad Hoc Study Group on Carbon Dioxide and Climate, National Academy of Sciences, Washington (DC).
  • Chetaille, A. (Ed.), 2010. Copenhague : face à l’immobilisme politique, l’élan citoyen ? Retours sur la quinzième Conférence des Parties à la Convention sur le changement climatique, du 7 au 19 décembre 2009, Copenhague, Paris, Coordination SUD.
  • Corell, E., Betsill, M.M., 2001. A comparative look at NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: Desertification and climate change, Environmental Politics, 1, 4, 86-107. [CrossRef]
  • Dahan, A., 2007. Le régime climatique entre science, expertise et politique, in Dahan, A. (Ed.), Les Modèles du futur, Paris, La Découverte.
  • Dahan, A., 2008. Climate expertise: Between scientific credibility and geopolitical imperatives, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33, 1, 71-81. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Dahan, A., 2009. Entre Poznan et Copenhague : le régime climatique au milieu du gué, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 17, 3, 271-282. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Dahan, A., 2010. Putting the Earth system in a numerical box? The evolution from climate modeling toward global change, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 282-292. [CrossRef]
  • Dahan, A., Aykut, S.C., Guillemot, H., Korczak, A., 2009. Les arènes climatiques : forums du futur ou foires aux palabres ? La conférence de Poznan. Rapport de recherche, Koyré Climate Series, 1 (http://www.koyre.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/Dahan_al.Texte_arenes_clims.pdf_-3.pdf).
  • Dahan, A., Aykut, S.C., Buffet, C., Viard-Crétat, A., 2010. Les Leçons politiques de Copenhague : faut-il repenser le régime climatique ? Rapport de recherche, Koyré Climate Series, 2 (http://www.koyre.cnrs.fr/spip.php?article96).
  • Dahan, A., Buffet, C., Viard-Crétat, A., 2011. Le compromis de Cancun : vertu du pragmatisme ou masque de l’immobilisme ? Rapport de recherche, Koyré Climate Series, 3 (http://www.koyre.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/climate.pdf).
  • Depledge, J., 2000. Tracing the Origins of the Kyoto Protocol: An Article-by-Article Textual History. Technical paper, FCCC/TP/2000/2, United Nations, Framework of Climate Change.
  • Encinas de Munagorri, R. (Ed.), 2009. Expertise et gouvernance du changement climatique, Paris, LDGJ.
  • Fisher, D.R., 2010. COP-15 in Copenhagen. How the merging of movements left civil society out in the cold, Global Environmental Politics, 10, 2, 11-17. [CrossRef]
  • Fisher, D.R., Green, J., 2004. Understanding disenfranchisement: Civil society and developing countries’ influence and participation in global governance for sustainable development, Global Environmental Politics, 4, 3, 65-84. [CrossRef]
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London, SAGE Publications.
  • GIEC, 2007. Bilan 2007 des changements climatiques : contribution des groupes de travail I, II et III au quatrième rapport d’évaluation du Groupe d’experts intergouvernemental sur l’évolution du climat [Pachauri, R.K., Reisinger, A. (Eds)], Genève, GIEC.
  • Grundmann, R., 2006. Ozone and climate: Scientific consensus and leadership, Science, Technology & Human Values, 31, 1, 73-101. [CrossRef]
  • Grundmann, R., 2007. Climate change and knowledge politics, Environmental Politics, 16, 3, 414-432. [CrossRef]
  • Hansen, J., Johnson, D., Lacis, A., Lebedeff, S., Lee, P., Rind, D., Russel, G., 1981. Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide, Science, 213, 4511, 957-966. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Hulme, M., 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press.
  • Hulme, M., 2010. Cosmopolitan climates: Hybridity, foresight and meaning, Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 3-4, 267-276. [CrossRef]
  • IEA (International Energy Agency), 2009. World Energy Outlook, Paris, OECD/IEA (http://www.iea.org/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=2160).
  • Jasanoff, S., 1987. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science, Social Studies of Science, 17, 2, 195-230. [CrossRef]
  • Jasanoff, S., 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press.
  • Jasanoff, S., 2010. A new climate for society, Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 3-4, 233-253. [CrossRef]
  • Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Peterson, J., Pinch, T. (Eds), 1995. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London, SAGE Publications.
  • Keohane, R.O., 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press.
  • Keohane, R.O., Nye, J., 2000. Power and Interdependence, New York, Longman.
  • Latour, B., 1991. Nous navons jamais été modernes : essai danthropologie symétrique, Paris, La Découverte.
  • Latour, B., 2001. L’Espoir de Pandore, Paris, La Découverte.
  • Leclerc, G., 2001. Histoire de la vérité et généalogie de l’autorité, Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, 2, 11, 205-213. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Leggett, J., Pepper, W.J., Swart, R.J. (Eds), 1992. Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: An update, in Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A., Varney, S.K. (Eds), Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge (UK), New York and Victoria (Australia), Cambridge University Press.
  • Manabe, S., Wetherald, R.T., 1967. Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 24, 3, 241-259. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Matarasso, P., 2003. Évaluation intégrée et modélisation : comment le changement climatique a transformé la conception que nous nous faisons des problèmes de décision, Annales des Ponts et chaussées, 107-108, 71-79.
  • Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S.C.B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D.J., Allen, M.R., 2009. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C, Nature, 458, 1158-1162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Nakicenovic, N., Swart, R. (Eds), 2000. Emissions Scenarios: 2000 Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers, Geneva, IPCC.
  • Nations unies, 1992. Convention-cadre des Nations unies sur les changements climatiques. FCCC/INFORMAL/84, GE.05-62221(F) 180705 26 07 05 (http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/background/items/2853.php [Français]).
  • Nordhaus, W.D., 1994. Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.
  • Ollitrault, S., 2008. Militer pour la planète : sociologie des écologistes, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes.
  • Oreskes, N., Conway, E.M., 2010. Merchands of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, London, Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Ostrom, E., 2009. A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5095.
  • Pestre, D., 2003. Science, argent et politique : un essai d’interprétation, Paris, INRA Éditions.
  • Pielke, R.A., Jr., 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press.
  • Prins, G., Rayner, S., 2007a. Time to ditch Kyoto, Nature, 449, 973-975. [CrossRef]
  • Prins, G., Rayner, S., 2007b. The Wrong Trousers: Radically Rethinking Climate Policy. Joint research paper of the Institute for Science, Innovation and Society and the MacKinder Programme for the Study of Long-Wave Events, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, Oxford.
  • Prins, G., Galiana, I., Green, C., et al., 2010. The Hartwell Paper: A New Direction for Climate Policy after the Crash of 2009. Joint research paper of the Institute for Science, Innovation and Society and the MacKinder Programme for the Study of Long-Wave Events, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, Oxford.
  • Radanne, P., Diaz, E., Goetz, E., 2010. Les Enseignements de la conférence de Copenhague sur le climat (http://www.association4d.org/IMG/pdf_Les_COP15_FF4_enseignements_janv10.pdf).
  • Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R.A., Jr., 2000. Breaking the global-warming gridlock, The Atlantic Monthly, 286, 1, 55-64.
  • Schmidt, G., Archer, D., 2009. Too much of a bad thing, Nature, 458, 1117-1118. [CrossRef]
  • Shackley, S., Wynne, B., 1996. Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority, Science, Technology & Human Values, 21, 3, 275-302. [CrossRef]
  • Sluijs, J. van der, Eijndhoven, J. van, Shackley, S., Wynne, B., 1998. Anchoring devices in science for policy: The case of consensus around climate sensitivity, Social Studies of Science, 28, 2, 291-323. [CrossRef]
  • Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., Tighnor, M.M.B., Miller, H.L., Jr. (Eds), 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge (UK) and New York, Cambridge University Press (http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml).
  • Stern, N., 2009. Blueprint for a Safer Planet: How to Manage Climate Change and Create a New Era of Progree and Prosperity, London, The Bodley Head Ltd.
  • UNEP, 2010. The Emissions Gap Report: Are the Copenhagen Accord Pledges Sufficient to Limit Global Warming to 2 °C or 1.5 °C? A preliminary Assessment [Elzen, M. den, Hare, W., Höhne, N., Levin, K., Lowe, J., Riahi, K., Rogelj, J., Sawin, E., Taylor, C., Vuuren, D. van, Ward, M. (Eds)], UNEP, Nairobi (http://www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/emissionsgapreport/).
  • Ward, B., Dubos, R., 1972. Only One Earth: The Care and Maintenance of a Small Planet. An Unofficial Report Commissioned by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, New York, WW Norton & Company Inc.
  • WBGU, 1995. Scenario for the Derivation of Global CO2 Reduction Targets and Implementation Strategies: Statement on the Occasion of the First Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Berlin. Special Report, WBGU, Bremerhaven (http://www.wbgu.de/en/publications/special-reports/special-report-1995/).
  • WBGU, 1997. Targets for Climate Protection: A study for the Third Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Kyoto. Special Report, WBGU Bremerhaven (http://www.wbgu.de/en/publications/special-reports/special-report-1997/).
  • WBGU, 2003. World in Transition: Towards Sustainable Energy Systems. Flagship Report, London and Sterning, VA, Earthscan (http://www.wbgu.de/en/publications/flagship-reports/flagship-report-2003-energy/).
  • WBGU, 2009. Solving the Climate Dilemma: The Budget Approach. Special Report, Berlin, WBGU (http://www.wbgu.de/en/publications/special-reports/special-report-2009/).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.