EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 16 / No 3 (Juillet-Septembre 2008) Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16 3 (2008) 265-273 References
Open Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 16, Number 3, Juillet-Septembre 2008
Page(s) 265 - 273
Section Actualités de la recherche
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008055
Published online 16 December 2008
  • Agence européenne pour l'environnement (AEE), 2002. Signaux précoces et leçons tardives : le principe de précaution 1896-2000. Rapport, Copenhagen, AEE. Version française accessible sur : http://reports.fr.eea.europa.eu/environmental_issue_report_2001_22/fr/FR_summary_points.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Ambrosi, P., Courtois, P., 2004. Impacts du changement climatique et modélisation intégrée, la part de l'arbitraire, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 12, 4, 375-387. 01 Barnes, B., Edge, D. (Eds), 1982. Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, Milton Keynes, Open University Press. 02 Corral Quintana, S., 2000. Una Metodología Integrada de Explotación y Comprensión de los Processos de Elaboración de Políticas Públicas. European Commission, Ispra, EUR 19724 ES. 03 Craye, M., Funtowicz, S., Van der Sluijs, J.P., 2005. A reflexive approach to dealing with uncertainties in environmental health risk science and policy, International Journal for Risk Assessment and Management, 5, 2, 216-236. [Google Scholar]
  • Douguet, J.-M., Janssen, P.H.M., O'Connor, M., Petersen, A.C., Van der Sluijs, J.P., à paraître. Uncertainty assessment in a deliberative perspective, in Pereira Guimarães, Â., Funtowicz, S., Science for Policy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Dordrecht, Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  • Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., 1993. Science for the Post-Normal Age, Futures, 25, 735-755. [Google Scholar]
  • Guimarães Pereira, Â., O'Connor, M., 1999. Information and communication technology and the popular appropriation of sustainability problems, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2, 3, 411-424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guimarães Pereira, Â., Blasques, J., Corral Quintana, S., Funtowicz, S., 2003. TIDDD – Tools To Inform Debates Dialogues & Deliberations: The GOUVERNe Project at the JRC. European Commission, Ispra, EUR 21880 EN. [Google Scholar]
  • Janssen, P.H.M., Petersen, A.C., Van der Sluijs, J.P., Risbey, J.S., Ravetz, J.R., 2005. A guidance for assessing and communicating uncertainties, Water Science and Technology, 52, 6, 125-131. 10 Maxim, L., Van der Sluijs, J.P., Douguet, J.-M., à paraître. Mettre en œuvre du principe de précaution, Risques. 11 Nowotny, H., 1999. The place of people in our knowledge, European Review, 7, 2, 247-262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connor, M., 1999. Dialogue and debate in a post-normal practice of science: a reflexion, Futures, 31, 671-687. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connor, M., 2002. Greening the Cube, C3ED Research Report, C3ED, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Guyancourt. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connor, M., 2004. The Kerbabel Indicator Dialogue Box (v.3), C3ED Research Report, C3ED, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Guyancourt. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connor, M., 2006. Building knowledge partnerships with ICT? Social and technological conditions of conviviality, in Guimarães Pereira, Â, Guedes Vaz, S., Tognetti, S., Interfaces between Science and Society, Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Ravetz, J., 2005. The Non-Sense Guide to Science, London, New Internationalist Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Risbey, J., Van der Sluijs, J., Kloprogge, P. Ravetz, J., Funtowicz, S., Corral Quintana, S., 2005. Application of a checklist for quality assistance in environmental modelling to an energy model, Environmental Modelling & Assessment, 10, 1, 63-79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saltelli, A., Chan, K, Scott, E.M. (Eds), 2000. Sensitivity Analysis, Chichester, John Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Saltelli, A., et al., 2004. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models, Chichester, John Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Sluijs, J.P., 1997. Anchoring Amid Uncertainty: On the Management of Uncertainties in Risk Assessment of Anthropogenic Climate Change. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Sluijs, J.P., 2002. A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment, Futures, 34, 133-146. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Sluijs, J.P., 2005. Uncertainty as a monster in the science policy interface: four coping strategies, Water Science and Technology, 52, 6, 87-92. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Sluijs, J.P., et al., 2002. Uncertainty Assessment of the IMAGE/TIMER B1 CO2 Emissions Scenario, Using the NUSAP Method. Report No 410 200 104 (2002), Dutch National Research Program on Climate Change, Bilthoven (http://www.nusap.net/workshop/report/finalrep.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Sluijs, J.P., et al., 2003. RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication: Detailed Guidance. Report, Utrecht University, Utrecht (http://www.nusap.net/downloads/detailedguidance.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Sluijs, J.P., Craye, M., Funtowicz, S., Kloprogge, P., Ravetz, J., Risbey, J., 2005. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model based environmental assessment: the NUSAP System, Risk Analysis, 25, 2, 481-492. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.