Open Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 16, Number 3, Juillet-Septembre 2008
Page(s) 209 - 219
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008051
Published online 16 December 2008
  • Barthod, C, Touzet, G., 1994. De Strasbourg à Helsinki. Les deux premières conférences ministérielles pour la protection des forêts en Europe, Revue Forestière Française, 46, 4, 319-334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bateson, G., 1979. La nature et la pensée, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  • Brédif, H., Boudinot, P., 2001. Quelles forêts pour demain ? Éléments de stratégie pour une approche rénovée du développement durable, Paris, L'Harmattan. [Google Scholar]
  • Brédif, H., Arnould, P., 2004. Évaluer n'est pas gérer. Considérations pour rompre le pouvoir des critères et des indicateurs, Revue Forestière Française, 56, 5, 485-502. [Google Scholar]
  • Buttoud, G., Karsenty, A. (2001). L'écocertification de la gestion des forêts tropicales, Revue forestière française, 53, 6, 691-706. 08Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., 2005. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority, Governance: an international journal of policy, administration and institutions, 15, 4, 503-529, Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • CEPI (Confederation of European Paper Industries), 2000. Comparative Matrix of Forest Certification Schemes. Bruxelles. [Google Scholar]
  • Diamond, J., 2005. Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York, Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 2006. Forest Products Annual Market Review 2005-2006, Rome. 13FAO, 2007. Situation des forêts du monde 2007, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • FERN (the Forests and European Union Resource Network), 2001. Behind the logo, An environnemental and social assessement of forest certification schemes. Rapport établi à partir d'études de cas de WWW France, Taiga Consulting, Taiga Rescue Network, Robin Wood, NRDC, Fern, Finnish Nature League, Greenpeace International. 15Guéneau, S., 2007. Certification as a new private global forest governance system: The regulatory potential of the Forest Stewardship Council. Communication orale effectuée le 8 février 2007 au Basel Institute on governance. [Google Scholar]
  • Humphreys, D., 2006. Logjam. Deforestation and the crisis of global governance. Londres, Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  • Ozanne, L.K., Vlosky, R.P., 2003. Certification from the US consumer perspective: A comparison from 1995 and 2000, Forest products journal, 53, 3, 13-21. 18Pech, T., Padis M.-O., 2004. Les multinationales du cœur : les ONG, la politique et le marché, Paris, Seuil. 19Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., Kemp, R., 2006. Reflexive governance for sustainable development, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • WWF (World Wide Fund For Nature), 2005. Rapport Forests for Life 2005, Gand, WWF international. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.