EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 12 / No 3 (Juillet-Septembre 2004) Nat. Sci. Soc., 12 3 (2004) 274-284 References
Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 12, Number 3, Juillet-Septembre 2004
Page(s) 274 - 284
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2004039
Published online 19 October 2004
  • Becker, E., Jahn, T., Stiess, I., Wehling, P., 1997. Sustainability: a Cross-Disciplinary Concept for Social Transformations, Frankfurt/Paris, Unesco. [Google Scholar]
  • Benton, T., 1994, Biology, social theory in the environmental debate, in Redclift, M., Benton, T. (Eds), Social Theory and the Global Environment, London/New York, Routledge, 28-50. [Google Scholar]
  • Blowers, A., Glasbergen, P., 1995. The search for sustainable development, in Glasbergen, P., Blowers, A. (Eds), Environmental Policy in an International Context, London, Arnold/Open University, book 2, 163-183. [Google Scholar]
  • Broekhans, B., 2003. Hoe milieukunde geschiedenis werd. Demarcatie van een maatschappelijk relevante wetenschap, 1970-2000 (Comment la science de l'environnement est devenue histoire. Démarcation d'une science à pertinence sociale, 1970-2000), Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • De Groot, W.T., 1992. Environmental Science Theory, Amsterdam, Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Dumas, B., 1996. Science normale et sciences humaines : les voies de l'interdisciplinarité pour la résolution des problèmes environnementaux, in Tessier, R., Vaillancourt, J.-G., La Recherche sociale en environnement, Montréal, Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 75-88. [Google Scholar]
  • Hannigan, J., 1995. Environmental Sociology, London/New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Hollaender, K., 2001. Interdisziplinarität in den Umweltwissenschaften: Konzeption(en), Organisation, Erfahrungen, in Fränzle, O., Müller, F., und Schröder, W. (Eds), Handbuch der Umweltwissenschaften, Landsberg am Lech, Ecomed Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Hollaender, K., 2004. Interdisziplinäre Forschung: Merkmale, Einflussfaktoren und Effekte.Thèse de doctorat de l'Université de Cologne, online via http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de [Google Scholar]
  • Irwin, A., 2001. Sociology and the Environment, Cambridge, Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Jamison, A., 1996. The Shaping of the Global Environmental Agenda: The Role of Non-Governmental Organisations, in Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., Wynne, B. (Eds), Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology, London, Sage, 224-245. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S., 1990. The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policy Makers, Harvard, Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Jórgensen, S.E., Johnsen, I., 1981. Principles of Environmental Science and Technology, Amsterdam, Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • La Rivière, J.M.W., 1991. Co-operation between natural and social sciences in global change research: imperatives, realities, opportunities, International Social Science Journal, 130, 619-626. [Google Scholar]
  • Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., Wynne, B. (Eds), 1996. Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Leroy, P., 1995. Environmental Science as a Vocation, Lecture inaugural, Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Leroy, P., 1997. Interdisciplinarity as a Serial Specialists' Attitude: Dutch Environmental Sciences and the Nijmegen Experience with Interdisciplinarity, paper communicated at the AUDES Conference on Interdisciplinarity in University Education, Chambéry, France, September 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • Leroy, P., Van den Bosch, H., Ligthart, S., 2001. The Role of Project-Based Learning in the “Political and Socials Sciences of the Environment” Curriculum at Nijmegen University, International Journal for Sustainability in Higher Education, 2, 1, 8-20. [Google Scholar]
  • Mishan, E., 1968. The Costs of Economic Growth, London, Pelican Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Nebel, B.J., Wright, R.T., 1993. Environmental Science, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons, M., 2001, Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Riordan, T. (Ed.), 1995. Environmental Science for Environmental Management, Harlow, Longman. [Google Scholar]
  • Roqueplo, Ph., 1991. L'expertise scientifique: convergence ou conflit de rationalité ?, in Theys, J., et al., Environnement, science et politique, Paris, Germes, 43-80. [Google Scholar]
  • Roszak, Th., 1972. Where the Wasteland Ends, Doubleday, Garden City Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Scholz, R., Stünzl, J., Mieg, H.A., Bösch, S., 1997. Methods for Interface Management: Interdisciplinary ETH-UNS Case Studies for Sustainability, paper presented at the Conference “Science for a Sustainable Society: Integrating Natural and Social Sciences”, Roskilde (Denmark), October 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • Sloep, P.B., 1994. The Impact of “Sustainability” on the Field of Environmental Science, in Skirbekk, G. (Ed.), The Notion of Sustainability and its Normative Implications, Oslo, Scandinavian University Press, 29-55. [Google Scholar]
  • Udo de Haes, H.A., 1984. Milieukunde, begripsbepaling en afbakening (Environmental Science: Concepts and Boundaries), in Boersema, J.J., et al. (Ed.), Basisboek Milieukunde (Environmental Science Textbook), Meppel/Amsterdam, Boom, 17-30 (en néerlandais). [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne, B., 1992. Uncertainty and Environmental Learning, Global Environmental Change, 2, 111-127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zanoni, M., Vargas, M., Pivot, A., Raynaut, C., Lescure, J.-P., Quensière, J., 1997. La Recherche en environnement. À propos de quelques pratiques interdisciplinaires, unpublished paper resulting from an international workshop on interdisciplinary scientific practices (University of Campinas, Brasil, December 1996). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.