Methodological challenges of trans-disciplinary research: some systemic reflections
Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16 3 (2008) 241-251
Published online: 2008-12-16
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Paths to Trans disciplinarity: Reconnecting Pathways and Positionality
Roderick J. LawrenceWorld Futures 1 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2025.2483133
Applying Transdisciplinary Thinking to Pastoral Livelihoods and Environments
Keith Woodford, Xiaomeng Lucock and Derrick MootAnimals 15 (13) 1933 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15131933
Transdisciplinary architectures: reconnecting theories, research and practices
Roderick John LawrenceArchnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2024-0151
1 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1109/CIITE62244.2024.10987714
The “Face” of Coach Development: A Systematic Review of the Role of the Coach Developer
Timothy Jones, Justine Allen and Stephen MacdonaldInternational Sport Coaching Journal 1 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2022-0017
How researchers shape the construction of landscape change – insights from a scenario study
Andrea Knierim, Claudia Bieling and Peter ZanderLandscape Research 46 (8) 1057 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2021.1940116
Collaborative survival and the politics of livability: Towards adaptation otherwise
Jamie HaverkampWorld Development 137 105152 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105152
622 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725108
How can science support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development? Four tasks to tackle the normative dimension of sustainability
Flurina Schneider, Andreas Kläy, Anne B. Zimmermann, et al.Sustainability Science 14 (6) 1593 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00675-y
Systems Practice: How to Act
Ray IsonSystems Practice: How to Act 39 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7351-9_3
Ideals, practices, and future prospects of stakeholder involvement in sustainability science
Jahel Mielke, Hannah Vermaßen and Saskia EllenbeckProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (50) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706085114
Insights and future directions of transdisciplinary practice in the urban water sector
Ana Guzmán Ruiz, Meredith Dobbie and Rebekah BrownJournal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 7 (2) 251 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0351-8
Can science on transformation transform science? Lessons from co-design
Susanne C MoserCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 20 106 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.10.007
Governing in the Anthropocene: What Future Systems Thinking in Practice?
Ray IsonSystems Research and Behavioral Science 33 (5) 595 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2421
Teaching and learning reflexive skills in inter- and transdisciplinary research: A framework and its application in environmental science education
K.P.J. (Karen) Fortuin and C.S.A. (Kris) van KoppenEnvironmental Education Research 22 (5) 697 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1054264
Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research
Cynthia Mitchell, Dana Cordell and Dena FamFutures 65 86 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.007
229 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8959-2_11
Returning Organic Residues to Agricultural Land (RORAL) – Fuelling the Follow-the-Technology approach
T. Wassenaar, E. Doelsch, F. Feder, et al.Agricultural Systems 124 60 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.10.007
The contribution of systems analysis to training students in cognitive interdisciplinary skills in environmental science education
K. P. J. Fortuin, C. S. A. van Koppen and C. KroezeJournal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 3 (2) 139 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0106-3
Rethinking the ‘Project’: Bridging the Polarized Discourses in IWRM
Catherine AllanJournal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14 (3) 231 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.702012
Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic
Ray IsonFarming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic 141 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_7
Sustainable Catchment Managing in a Climate Changing World: New Integrative Modalities for Connecting Policy Makers, Scientists and Other Stakeholders
Ray Ison, Kevin Collins, John Colvin, et al.Water Resources Management 25 (15) 3977 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9880-4
Experiential Science; Towards an Integration of Implicit and Reflected Practitioner-Expert Knowledge in the Scientific Development of Organic Farming
Ton BaarsJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (6) 601 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-010-9281-3
Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World
Ray IsonSystems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World 37 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-125-7_3
Editorial: living with environmental change: adaptation as social learning
Kevin Collins and Ray IsonEnvironmental Policy and Governance 19 (6) 351 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.520