Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 29, 2021
Pour une géologie politique
Page(s) S12 - S24
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021043
Published online 01 December 2021
  • Anderson K., Peters G., 2016. The trouble with negative emissions, Science, 354, 6309, 182-183, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4567. [Google Scholar]
  • Ashworth P., Cormick C., 2011. Enabling the Social Shaping of CCS Technology, in Havercroft I., Macrory R. and Stewart R.B. (Eds.), Carbon Capture and Storage: Emerging Legal and Regulatory Issues, London, Hart Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Ashworth P., Pisarski A., Thambimuthu K., 2009. Public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage in a proposed demonstration area, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 223, 3, 299-304, https://doi.org/10.1243/09576509JPE622. [Google Scholar]
  • Ashworth P., Einsiedel E., Howell R., Brunsting S., Boughen N., Boyd A., Shackley S. et al., 2013. Public Preferences to CCS: How does it Change Across Countries? Energy Procedia, 37, 7410-7418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.683. [Google Scholar]
  • Aubertin C., Damian M., 2010. L’actualité des conventions sur le climat et la biodiversité. Convergences et blocages, in Aubertin C. et Vivien F.D. (Eds.), Le développement durable, Paris, La documentation française, 47-76. [Google Scholar]
  • Barthe Y., de Blic D., Heurtin J.P., Lagneau E., Lemieux C., Linhardt D., Moreau de Bellaing C., Rémy C., Trom D., 2013. Sociologie pragmatique : mode d’emploi, Politix, 103, 3, 175-204, https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.103.0173. [Google Scholar]
  • Batellier P., 2016. Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats, VertigO – la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement [En ligne], 16, 1, https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.16920. [Google Scholar]
  • Batellier P., Maillé M.E., 2017. Acceptabilité sociale : sans oui, c’est non, Montréal, Éditions Ecosociété. [Google Scholar]
  • Bertaud du Chazaud S., de Guillebon B., Henderson J., Pottier A., Silva M., 2018. L’acceptabilité des projets d’ingénierie du sous-sol : questionnement et mise en perspective autour de cas concrets, Pau, Rapport du projet Gefiss 0 « Gouvernance élargie pour les filières d’ingénierie du sous-sol ». [Google Scholar]
  • Boucher O. et al., 2014. Atelier de Réflexion Prospective Reagir Réflexion systémique sur les enjeux et méthodes de la géo-ingénierie de l’environnement, Paris, Agence nationale de la Recherche. [Google Scholar]
  • Brunsting S., Desbarats J., de Best-Waldhober M., Duetschke E., Oltra C., Upham P., Riesch H., 2011a. The Public and CCS: The importance of communication and participation in the context of local realities, Energy Procedia, 4, 6241-6247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.637. [Google Scholar]
  • Brunsting S., de Best-Waldhober M., Feenstra C.F.J., Mikunda T., 2011b. Stakeholder Participation Practices and Onshore CCS: Lessons from the Dutch CCS Case Barendrecht, Energy Procedia, 4, 6376-6383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.655. [Google Scholar]
  • Brunsting S., de Best-Waldhober M., Terwel B.W., 2013. “I Reject your Reality and Substitute my Own!” Why More Knowledge about CO2 Storage Hardly Improves Public Attitudes, Energy Procedia, 37, 7419-7427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.684. [Google Scholar]
  • Bui M., Adjiman C.S., Bardow A., Anthony E.J., Boston A., Brown S., Fennell P.S. et al., 2018. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): The Way Forward, Energy & Environmental Science, 11, 5, 1062-1176, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02342A. [Google Scholar]
  • de Best-Waldhober M., Paukovic M., Brunsting S., Daamen D., 2011. Awareness, knowledge, beliefs, and opinions regarding CCS of the Dutch general public before and after information, Energy Procedia, 4, 6292-6299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.644. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission, 2011. Special Eurobarometer 364. Public awareness and acceptance of CO2 capture and storage. [Google Scholar]
  • Fortin M.J., Fournis Y., 2015. Une participation conflictuelle : la trajectoire territoriale des mobilisations contre le gaz de schiste au Québec, Participations, 13, 3, 119-144. [Google Scholar]
  • Geels F.W., 2005. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 6, 681-696, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilbert C., Henry E., 2012. La définition des problèmes publics : entre publicité et discrétion, Revue française de sociologie, 53, 1, 35-59, https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.531.0035. [Google Scholar]
  • Ha-Duong M., Gaultier M., de Guillebon B., 2011. Social aspects of Total’s Lacq CO2 capture, transport and storage pilot project, 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 4 (janvier), 6263-6272. [Google Scholar]
  • Howell R., Shackley S., Mabon L., 2012. Public perceptions to low carbon energy technologies – Results from a Scottish Large Group Workshop, Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh. [Google Scholar]
  • Howell E., Nan L., Heather A., Scheufele D.A., Xenos M.A., Brossard D., 2017. How do U.S. state residents form opinions about “fracking” in social contexts? A multilevel analysis, Energy Policy, 106, 345-355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.003. [Google Scholar]
  • Huijts N.M.A., Molin E.J.E., Steg L., 2012. Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1, 525-531, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2019. World Energy Outlook, Paris, International Energy Agency. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2016. Climate change 2013, The physical science basis, Bern. [Google Scholar]
  • Kühn M., Tesmer M., Pilz P., Meyer R., Reinicke K., Förster A., Kolditz O., Schäfer D., CLEAN Partners, 2012. CLEAN: project overview on CO2 large-scale enhanced gas recovery in the Altmark natural gas field (Germany), Environmental Earth Sciences, 67, 2, 311-321, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1714-z. [Google Scholar]
  • Lemieux C., 2007. À quoi sert l’analyse des controverses ? Mil neuf cent – Revue d’histoire intellectuelle, 25, 1, 191-212, https://doi.org/10.3917/mnc.025.0191. [Google Scholar]
  • Lemieux C., 2012. Peut-on ne pas être constructiviste ?, Politix, 100, 4, 169-187, https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.100.0169. [Google Scholar]
  • Mabon L., Vercelli S., Shackley S., Anderlucci J., Battisti N., Franzese C., Boot K., 2013. “Tell me what you Think about the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide”: Towards a Fuller Understanding of Public Perceptions of CCS, Energy Procedia, 37, 7444-7453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.687. [Google Scholar]
  • McGlade C., Ekins P., 2015. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C, Nature, 517, 7533, 187-190, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14016. [Google Scholar]
  • McLachlan C., Shackley S., Gough C., 2004. The Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage, Tyndall Centre Working Paper (TWP 44). [Google Scholar]
  • Mors T., Terwel E., Zaal M.B., 2014. Can monetary compensation ease the siting of CCS projects?, Energy Procedia, 63, 7113-7115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.745. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Neill R., Nadaï A., 2012. Risque et démonstration, la politique de capture et de stockage du dioxyde de carbone (CCS) dans l’Union européenne, VertigO – la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement [En ligne], 12, 1, https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.12172. [Google Scholar]
  • Rayner S., Heyward C., Kruger T., Pidgeon N., Redgwell C., Savulescu J., 2013. The Oxford Principles, Climatic Change, 121, 3, 499-512, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2. [Google Scholar]
  • Schattschneider E.E., 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar]
  • Vercelli S., Anderlucci J., Memoli R., Battisti N., Mabon L., Lombardi S., 2013. Informing People about CCS: A Review of Social Research Studies, Energy Procedia, 37, 7464-7473, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.690. [Google Scholar]
  • Vercelli S., Lombardi S., Modesti F., Tartarello M.C., Finoia M.G., De Angelis D., Bigi S., Ruggiero L., Pirrotta S., 2016. Making the Communication of CCS more “Human”, Energy Procedia, 114, 7367-7378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1868. [Google Scholar]
  • Vercelli S., Lombardi S., Bigi S., Tartarello M.C., Finoia M.G., Dolcetti F., 2017. Topic and Concerns Related to the Potential Impacts of CO2 Storage: Results from a Stakeholders Questionnaire, Energy Procedia, 114, 7379-7398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1869. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.