Open Access
| Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 26, Number 1, January-March 2018
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 67 - 75 | |
| Section | Vie de la recherche – Research news | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018023 | |
| Published online | 06 June 2018 | |
- Apostel L., Berger G., Michaud G., Boisot M., Heckhausen H., Jantsch E., Lichnerowicz A., Piaget J., 1972. Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities, Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. [Google Scholar]
- Bromham L., Dinnage R., Hua X., 2016. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success, Nature, 534, 684-687. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruce A., Lyall C., Tait J., Williams R., 2004. Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework Programme, Futures, 36, 457-470. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dedeurwaerdere T., 2014. Sustainability science for strong sustainability, Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Frodeman R., Briggle A., 2016. Socrates tenured: The institutions of 21st century philosophy, New York, Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar]
- Giles J., 2004. Sandpit initiative digs deep to bring disciplines together, Nature, 427, 187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gleed A., Marchant D., 2016. Interdisciplinarity. Survey report for the Global Research Council, DJS Research, https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-grc/data/5th/Survey_Report_on_Interdisciplinarity_for_GRC_DJS_Research.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Goring S.J., Weathers K.C., Dodds W.K., Soranno P.A., Sweet L.C., Cheruvelil K.S., Kominoski J.S., Rüegg J., Thorn A.M., Utz R.M., 2014. Improving the culture of interdisciplinary collaboration in ecology by expanding measures of success, Frontiers in the Ecology and the Environment, 12, 39-47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jollivet M., Legay J.-M., 2005. Canevas pour une réflexion sur une interdisciplinarité entre sciences de la nature et sciences sociales, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13, 2, 184-188, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2005030. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Neuman W.L., 1997. Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches, Boston, Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
- Qin J., Lancaster F.W., Allen B., 1997. Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences, Journal of the American Society for the Information Science, 48, 893-916. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Roy E.D., Morzillo A.T., Seijo F., Reddy S.M.W., Rhemtulla J.M., Milder J.C., Kuemmerle T., Martin S.L., 2013. The elusive pursuit of interdisciplinarity at the human-environment interface, BioScience, 63, 745-753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sanz-Menéndez L., Bordons M., Zulueta M.A., 2001. Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas, Research Evaluation, 10, 47-58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sedooka A., Steffen G., Paulsen T., Darbellay F., 2015. Paradoxe identitaire et interdisciplinarité : un regard sur les identités disciplinaires des chercheurs, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 23, 4, 367-377, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015056. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Stengers I., 2013. Une autre science est possible ! Manifeste pour un ralentissement des sciences. Suivi de William James, Le poulpe du doctorat, présenté par Thierry Drumm, Paris, Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond. [Google Scholar]
- Vanloqueren G., Baret P., 2009. How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations, Research Policy 38, 6, 971-983. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zaccai E., 2008. Développement durable et disciplines scientifiques, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 15, 4, 379-388, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008004. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.