Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 21, Number 1, janvier-mars 2013
Page(s) 77 - 83
Section Regards – Focus
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2013067
Published online 15 July 2013
  • Asplen, L., 2008. Going with the flow: Living the Mangle in Environmental Management Practice, in Pickering, A., Guzik, K. (Eds), The Mangle in Practice: Science, Society and Becoming, Durham (NC), Duke University Press, 163-184. [Google Scholar]
  • Bateson, G., 1968. Conscious Purpose Versus Nature, in Cooper, D. (Ed.), To Free a Generation: The Dialectics of Liberation, New York, Collier, 34-49. [Google Scholar]
  • Bateson, G., 2000. The Roots of Ecological Crisis, in Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 496-501. [Google Scholar]
  • Beer, S., 1975. The Surrogate World We Manage, in Beer, S. (Ed.) Platform for Change: A Message from Stafford Beer, New York, John Wiley, 397-416. [Google Scholar]
  • de Groot, W., Lenders, H., 2006. Emergent Principles for River Management, Hydrobiologia, 565, 309-316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Landa, 2002. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy, London, Continuum Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Folke, C., 2006. Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Socio-Ecological Systems Analyses, Global Environmental Change, 16, 253-267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gunderson, L., Light, S., 2006. Adaptive Management and Adaptive Governance in the Everglades Ecosystem, Policy Science, 39, 323-334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heidegger, M., 1977. The Question Concerning Technology, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, transl. W. Lovitt, New York, Harper & Row, 3-35. [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchins, E., 1995. Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Jullien, F., 1999. The Propensity of Things: Toward a History of Efficacy in China, New York, Zone Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Li, K,Xu, Z., 2006. Overview of Dujiangyan Irrigation Scheme of Ancient China with Current Theory, Irrigation and Drainage, 55, 291-298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McPhee, J., 1989. Atchafalaya, in The Control of Nature, New York, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 3-92. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller, F. et al., 2010. Resilience and Vulnerability: Complementary or Conflicting Concepts? Ecology and Society, 15, 3, [online]. [Google Scholar]
  • Palca, J., 2008. In a Strategic Reversal, Dutch Embrace Floods, NPR, 22 January, www.npr.org/templates/story/story. php?storyId=18229027. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 2005. Asian Eels and Global Warming: A Posthumanist Perspective on Society and the Environment, Ethics and the Environment, 10, 29-43. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 2008a. Against Human Exceptionalism. Paper presented at the workshop What Does It Mean to Be Human? University of Exeter, 25 January, http://hdl.handle.net/10036/18873. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 2008b. New Ontologies, in Pickering, A. Guzik, K. (Eds), The Mangle in Practice: Science, Society and Becoming, Durham (NC), Duke University Press, 1-14. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 2009a. The Politics of Theory: Producing Another World, with some thoughts on Latour, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2, 197-212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 2009b. Beyond Design: Cybernetics, Biological Computers and Hylozoism, Synthese, 168, 469-491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering. A., 2010. The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 2012. Ontological Politics: Realism and Agency in Science, Technology and Art, Insights, 4, www.dur.ac.uk/ ias/insights/volume4/article9. [Google Scholar]
  • Rohde, S., Hostmann, M., Peter, A., Ewald, K., 2006. Room for Rivers: An Integrative Search Strategy for Floodplain Restoration, Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 50-70. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott, J., 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven (CT), Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.