Free Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 17, Number 3, Juillet-Septembre 2009
Page(s) 241 - 247
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2009041
Published online 07 October 2009
  • Bacon, F., 1974. The Advancement of Learning [1605] and New Atlantis [1626], Oxford, Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Bain, C., Busch, L., 2004. Standards and Strategies in the Michigan Blueberry Industry. Research Report 585, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, East Lansing (MI). [Google Scholar]
  • Boltanski, L., Thévenot, L., 2006 [1st ed. 1991]. On justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Brockway, L.H., 1979. Science and C olonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens, New York, Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Brockway, L.H., 1988. Plant sciences and colonial expansion: The botanical chess game, in Kloppenburg, J.R., Jr. (Ed.), Seeds and Sovereignty: The Use and Control of Plant Genetic Resources, Durham (NC), Duke University Press, 49-66. [Google Scholar]
  • Bromley, D.W., 1998. Transitions to a New Political Economy: Law and Economics Reconsidered, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University, Department of Land Economy. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown, S., Getz, C., 2008. Privatizing farm worker justice: Regulating labor through voluntary certification and labeling, Geoforum, 39, 1184-1196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brunstad, R.J., Gaasland, I., Vardal, E., 2005. Multifunctionality of agriculture: An inquiry into the complementarity between landscape preservation and food security, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32, 469-488. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Busch, L., Bain, C., 2004. New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system, Rural Sociology, 69, 321-346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Byers, A., Giovannucci, D., Liu, P., 2008. Value-Adding Standards in the North American Food Market: Trade Opportunities in Certified Products for Developing Countries, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • Caswell, M., Day-Rubenstein, K., 2006. Agricultural research and development, in Wiebe, K., Gollehon, N. (Eds), Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2006 Edition. Report from the Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington (DC): http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/arei/eib16/eib16_3-2.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Charvolin, F., Joly, P.-B., Boutrais, R., Nuiccolai, G.P., 2008. Connaissances et légitimité dans les espèces hybrides de la recherche, Science et devenir de l'homme, 57-58, 126-141. [Google Scholar]
  • Cochrane, W., 1993. The Development of American Agriculture, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Comis, D., 1996. Green remediation: Using plants to clean the soil, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 51, 184. [Google Scholar]
  • Dale, B.E., 2008. Net energy: Still a (mostly) irrelevant, misleading and dangerous metric, Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2, 495-496. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis, I., 2005. The biggest contract, The Economist, 375, 8428, 87. [Google Scholar]
  • Dewey, J., 1927. The Public and Its Problems, New York, Henry Holt. [Google Scholar]
  • East, E.M., 1923. Mankind at the Crossroads, New York, Charles Scribner's Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Evans, G.A., 2000. Designer science and the “omic” revolution, Nature Biotechnology, 18, 127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frey, K., 1996. National Plant Breeding Study, I. Human and Financial Resources Devoted to Plant Breeding Research and Development in the United States in 1994. Special Report 98, Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames (IA). [Google Scholar]
  • Fulponi, L., 2006. Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers, Food Policy, 31, 1-13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grievink, J.-W., 2003. The changing face of the global food industry. OECD Conference Presentation, The Hague. [Google Scholar]
  • Guthman, J., 2007. The Polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance, Antipode, 39, 3, 456-478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen, M., Busch, L. Burkhardt, J. Lacy, W., Lacy, L., 1986. Plant breeding and biotechnology: New technologies raise important social questions, BioScience, 36, 29-39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harlan, J.R., 1984. Gene centers and gene utilization in American agriculture, in Yeatman, C.W., Kafton, D., Wilkes, G. (Ed.), Plant Genetic Resources: A Conservation Imperative, Boulder (CO), Westview Press, 111-129. [Google Scholar]
  • Hendrickson, M., Heffernan, W.D., Howard, P.H., Heffernan, J.B., 2001. Consolidation in food retailing and dairy: Implications for farmers and consumers in a global food system: http://www.nfu.org/images/heffernan.pdf (accessed 04/13/2002). [Google Scholar]
  • IAAKSTD, 2008. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development: http://agassessment.org/ (accessed 16/12/2008). [Google Scholar]
  • Knickel, K., Renting, H., 2000. Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development, Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 512-528. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lang, S., 1981. The File, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Levenstein, H., 1988. Revolution at the Table: The Transformation of the American Diet, New York, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu, P., Boto, I., Kortbech-Olesen, R., Vrolijk, B., Pilkauskas, P. (Eds_). 2001. World Markets for Organic Fruits and Vegetables: Opportunities for Developing Countries in the Production and Export of Organic Horticultural Products, Rome, FAO/ITC/CTA. [Google Scholar]
  • Lloyd, L.E., Cronier, C., 1989. Dietary guidelines: Implications for agriculture, in Carroll, K.K. (Ed.), Diet, Nutrition, and Health, Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Macek, T., Macková, M., Kás, J., 2000. Exploitation of plants for the removal of organics in environmental remediation, Biotechnology Advances, 18, 23-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marres, N., 2007. The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy, Social Studies of Science, 37, 759-780. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marshall, E., 2005. Will DNA bar codes breathe life into classification?, Science, 307, 1037. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McConnell, G., 1953. The Decline of Agrarian Democracy, Berkeley, University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  • McMichael, A.J., Beaglehole, R., 2000. The changing global context of public health, The Lancet, 356, 495-499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Middendorf, G., Busch, L., 1997. Inquiry for the public good: Citizen participation in agricultural research, Agriculture and Human Values, 14, 47-57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miele, M., 2008. Città slow: Producing slowness against the fast life, Space and Polity, 12, 135-156. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Monteny, G.-J., Bannink, A., Chadwick, D., 2006. Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 112, 163-170. [Google Scholar]
  • Osborne, M.A., 1982. The system of colonial gardens and the exploitation of French Algeria, 1830-1852, in Fitzgerald, E.P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the French Colonial Historical Society, Lanham (MD), University Press of America, 160-168. [Google Scholar]
  • Perkins, J.H., 1997. Geopolitics and the Green Revolution, New York, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pimentel, D., Patzek, T.W., 2005. Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower, Natural Resources Research, 14, 1, 65-76. [Google Scholar]
  • Plato, 1994. The Republic [360 B.C.], New York, Vintage Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Shiva, V., 1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution, London, Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Shukla, J., Nobre, C., Sellers, P., 1990. Amazon deforestation and climate change, Science, 247, 1322-1325. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stoeckle, M., 2003. Taxonomy, DNA, and the bar code of life, BioScience, 53, 796-797. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Szreter, S., 1993. The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: A critical intellectual history, Population and Development Review, 19, 659-701. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson, P.B., Nardone, A., 1999. Sustainable livestock production: Methodological and ethical challenges, Livestock Production Science, 61, 111-119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Uauy, R., Albala, C., Kain, J., 2001. Obesity trends in Latin America: Transiting from under- to overweight, The Journal of Nutrition, 131, 893S-899S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Walzer, M., 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York, Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Wheals, A.E., Basso, L.C., Alves, D.M.G., Amorim, H.V., 1999. Fuel ethanol after 25 years, Trends in Biotechnology, 17, 482-487. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wildman, R.E.C. (Ed.), 2001. Handbook of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods, Boca Raton (FL), CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Wolf, S., Zilberman, D. (Eds). 2001. Knowledge Generation and Technical Change: Institutional Innovation in Agriculture, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Worster, D., 1979. Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930's, New York, Oxford Univesity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne, B., Callon, M., Gonçalves, M.E., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., Joly, P.-B., Konopasek, Z., May, S., Neubauer, C., Rip, A., Siune, K., Stirling, A., Tallacchini, M., Felt, U., 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission, Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  • Young, L.R., Nestle, M., 2002. The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic, American Journal of Public Health, 92, 246-249. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.