Les outils de pilotage des cultures : diversité de leurs usages et enseignements pour leur conception
Natures Sciences Sociétés, 14 1 (2006) 19-29
Published online: 2006-04-29
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Représenter l’activité pour ouvrir l’exploration et l’imaginaire des concepteurs : le cas de la conception d’artefacts pour la transition agroécologique
Marianne Cerf, Lorène Prost, Thibault Lefeuvre, Laura Le Du and Hélène GrossActivites 21-1 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.9474
A new adaptive identification strategy of best crop management with farmers
Romain Gautron, Dorian Baudry, Myriam Adam, Gatien N. Falconnier, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Brian King and Marc CorbeelsField Crops Research 307 109249 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109249
On-farm assessment of an innovative dynamic fertilization method to improve nitrogen recovery in winter wheat
Raphaël Paut, Pierre Lebreton, Jean-Marc Meynard, Jean-Baptiste Gratecap, Annie Le Gall, Maeva Weens, Honorine Gabriel, Vincent Moulin, Christophe Bersonnet, Bernard Verbeque, Michel Bonnefoy, Ricardo Bidegain, Joël Lorgeoux and Marie-Hélène JeuffroyNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 129 (3) 475 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10332-7
Améliorer les outils numériques d’aide à la décision pour la protection phytosanitaire des cultures
Douadia Bougherara and Sophie ThoyerÉconomie rurale 388 95 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4000/11s12
Multidimensional and multiscale assessment of agroecological transitions. A review
Maryline Darmaun, Tiphaine Chevallier, Laure Hossard, Juliette Lairez, Eric Scopel, Jean-Luc Chotte, Adeline Lambert-Derkimba and Stéphane de TourdonnetInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 21 (1) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2193028
Reinforcement learning for crop management support: Review, prospects and challenges
Romain Gautron, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard, Philippe Preux, Marc Corbeels and Régis SabbadinComputers and Electronics in Agriculture 200 107182 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107182
Design of equipment for agroecology: Coupled innovation processes led by farmer-designers
Chloé Salembier, Blanche Segrestin, Nicolas Sinoir, et al.Agricultural Systems 183 102856 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102856
Prendre en compte l’adoption technologique dès le stade de la conception : le cas d’un projet en viticultureadoption des technologies, conseil agricole, intervention ergonomique en conception, représentation, viticulture
Jean Larbaigt, Céline Lemercier and Irène GaillardPerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé (22-1) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.4000/pistes.6442
Co-development of a decision support system for integrated weed management: Contribution from future users
F. Colas, S. Cordeau, S. Granger, et al.European Journal of Agronomy 114 126010 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126010
Les technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la transition agroécologique
Vincent Soulignac, Lola Leveau, François Pinet and Jean-Éric BergezSciences Eaux & Territoires Numéro 29 (3) 34 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3917/set.029.0034
263 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01953-2_12
Effectiveness criteria for customised agricultural life cycle assessment tools
M.A. Renouf, C. Renaud-Gentié, A. Perrin, et al.Journal of Cleaner Production 179 246 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.170
Genealogy of design reasoning in agronomy: Lessons for supporting the design of agricultural systems
Chloé Salembier, Blanche Segrestin, Elsa Berthet, Benoît Weil and Jean-Marc MeynardAgricultural Systems 164 277 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.05.005
Recadrer le conseil par l’agriculture écologiquement intensive
Soazig Di BiancoRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances 12 (2) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.039.0171
Innover dans le secteur de la transformation agroalimentaire en Afrique de l’Ouest
Thierry Ferré, Ignace Medah, Jean-François Cruz, et al.Cahiers Agricultures 27 (1) 15011 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018004
Innovative design for agriculture in the move towards sustainability: scientific challenges
Lorène Prost, Elsa T. A. Berthet, Marianne Cerf, et al.Research in Engineering Design 28 (1) 119 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0233-4
Intervenir pour la conception de l’espace de l’activité : vers un cadre méthodologique
Nadia HeddadActivites 14 (1) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.2958
Mismatch between a science-based decision tool and its use: The case of the balance-sheet method for nitrogen fertilization in France
Clémence Ravier, Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy and Jean-Marc MeynardNJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 79 (1) 31 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.10.001
Issues in evaluating sustainability of farming systems with indicators
Christian Bockstaller, Pauline Feschet and Frédérique AngevinOCL 22 (1) D102 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014052
Sociologie des grandes cultures
Sociologie des grandes cultures 205 (2014)https://doi.org/10.3917/quae.berna.2014.01.0205
Sylviculture et activité collective longitudinale : un premier repérage
Marc-Éric Bobillier Chaumon, Pierre Ruyneau de Saint George, Bruno Cuvillier and Philippe SarninActivites 11 (1) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.265
Gérer les connaissances pour tenir compte des nouveaux enjeux industriels
Nathalie GirardRevue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels Vol. XX (49) 51 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.3917/rips1.049.0049
Combining agroecology and management science to design field tools under high agrosystem structural or process uncertainty: Lessons from two case studies of grassland management
M. DuruAgricultural Systems 114 84 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.002
Participatory design of agricultural decision support tools: taking account of the use situations
Marianne Cerf, Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy, Lorène Prost and Jean-Marc MeynardAgronomy for Sustainable Development 32 (4) 899 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0091-z
Le conseiller, une pièce maîtresse sur l’échiquier de la coopérative agricole
Maryline Filippi and et Olivier FreyRevue d’Études en Agriculture et Environnement 96 (03) 439 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.4074/S1966960715003033
New Challenges in Agricultural Advisory Services from a Research Perspective: A Literature Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda
Guy Faure, Yann Desjeux and Pierre GasselinThe Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 18 (5) 461 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2012.707063
Lack of consideration for end-users during the design of agronomic models. A review
Lorène Prost, Marianne Cerf and Marie-Hélène JeuffroyAgronomy for Sustainable Development 32 (2) 581 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0059-4
Analyzing Theory and Use of Management Tools for Sustainable Agri-environmental Livestock Practices: The Case of the Pastoral Value in the French Pyrenees Mountains
H. Gross, N. Girard and D. MagdaJournal of Sustainable Agriculture 35 (5) 550 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2011.579840
An analysis of farmers’ use of phosphorus fertiliser in industrial agriculture: a case study in the Bordeaux region (south-western France)
Thomas Nesme, Samuel Brunault, Alain Mollier and Sylvain PellerinNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 91 (1) 99 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-011-9449-x
Réduire l’usage des pesticides. Un défi pour le conseil aux agriculteurs
Philippe Aujas, Anne Lacroix, Stéphane Lemarié and Raymond ReauÉconomie rurale (324) 18 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.3071
Basis for designing a tool to evaluate new cultivars
Christophe Lecomte, Lorène Prost, Marianne Cerf and Jean-Marc MeynardAgronomy for Sustainable Development 30 (3) 667 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009042
Concevoir et construire la décision
Marianne Cerf and Marie TaverneConcevoir et construire la décision 101 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.3917/quae.turkh.2009.01.0013
Concevoir et construire la décision
Vincent Blanfort, Michel Duru, Philippe Lecomte, Eduardo Chia and Jean-Philippe ChoisisConcevoir et construire la décision 147 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.3917/quae.turkh.2009.01.0015
Transitions vers l'agriculture biologique
Anne HaegelinTransitions vers l'agriculture biologique 257 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.3917/edagri.lamin.2009.01.0257
Concevoir et construire la décision
Marc Barbier, Françoise Maxime, Patrick Caron and Chantal LoyceConcevoir et construire la décision 264 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.3917/quae.turkh.2009.01.0023
Concevoir et construire la décision
Michel DuruConcevoir et construire la décision 223 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.3917/quae.turkh.2009.01.0020
Systèmes de culture innovants et durables
Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy, Jacques-Eric Bergez, Christophe David, et al.Systèmes de culture innovants et durables 109 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.3917/edagri.reau.2008.01.0109
Chorèmes et graphes
Sylvie Lardon and Mathieu CapitaineRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances 2 (2) (2008)
https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.004.0195
How do farmers make use of developmental intervention ?
Marianne Cerf and Marie-Angélina MagneActivites 04 (1) (2007)
https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1441
Comment les agriculteurs mobilisent-ils des interventions de développement ?
Marianne Cerf and Marie-Angélina MagneActivites 04 (1) (2007)
https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1430