EDP Sciences Journals List
  • French
  • English
Home Document
Subscriber Authentication Point
Free access article

Issue Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 13, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2005
Page(s) 21 - 32
DOI 10.1051/nss:2005003

References of  Natures Sciences Sociétés 13, 21-32 (2005)
  1. Auvergne, S., Fallet, B., Rousseau, L., 2001. Proposition d'une méthode d'aide à la concertation, Ingénieries, n° spécial 2001 : Multifonctionalité de l'agriculture et CTE.
  2. Banville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J.-M., Boulaire, C., 1998. A stakeholder approach to MCDA, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15, 1, 15-32 [CrossRef].
  3. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, Th., Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukias, A., Vincke, Ph., 2000. Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspective, Kluwer.
  4. Cointe, Ch., 1998. Aide à la gestion de conflit en conception concourante dans un système distribué. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montpellier 2 (sciences pour l'ingénieur), Montpellier.
  5. Dupont, Ch., 1994. La Négociation : conduite, théorie, applications, Paris, Dalloz.
  6. Easterbrook, S., Beck, E.E., Goodlet, J.S., Plowman, L., Sharples, M., Wood, C.C., 1993. A survey of empirical studies of conflict, in Easterbrook, S. (Ed.), CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict, Berlin, Heidelberg, New-York, Springer-Verlag.
  7. Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M., 2001. A framework for multi valued reasoning over inconsistent viewpoints, 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, IEEE, 411-420.
  8. Eden, C., Ackermann, F., 2001. SODA - the principles, in Rosenhead, J., Mingers, J. (Eds), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, New York, John Willey and sons, 21-42.
  9. Firma-project, 2000. The Firma Project, http://firma.cfpm.org/index.html
  10. Grosjean, S., Fixmer, P., Brassac, Ch., 2000. Those "psychological tools" inside the design process, Knowledge-Based systems, 13, 3-9.
  11. Hämäläinen, R., Kettunen, E., Marttunen, M., Ehtamo, H., 2001. Evaluating a framework for multi-stakeholder decision support in water resources management, Group decision and negotiation, 10, 6, 331-353 [CrossRef].
  12. Harribey, J.-M., 1998. Le Développement soutenable, Paris, Economica.
  13. Landry, M., 1995. A note on the concept of "problem", Organization studies, Egos, 2, 16, 315-343.
  14. Landry, M., Pascot, D., Briolat, D., 1983. Can DSS evolve without changing our view of the concept of problem?, Decision Support Systems, 1, 1, 25-36.
  15. Latouche, D., Lamonde, P., Julien P.-A., 1975. La Méthode des scénarios: une réflexion sur la démarche et la théorie de la prospective, Paris, La Documentation française.
  16. Lax, D.A., Sebenius, J.K., 1986. The Manager as Negotiator, London, Collier Macmillan Publishers.
  17. Mermet, L., 1992. Stratégies pour la gestion de l'environnement, Paris, L'Harmattan.
  18. Minsky, M., 1985. The Society of Mind, New-York, Simon and Schuster.
  19. Newell, A., 1990. Unified theories of cognition, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.
  20. Ostanello, A., Tsoukias, A., 1993. An explicative model of "public" interorganizational interactions, European Journal Of Operational Research.
  21. Piaget, J., 1967. Les méthodes de l'épistémologie génétique, in Piaget, J. (Ed.), Logique et connaissance scientifique, Paris, Gallimard, 62-131.
  22. Rasmussen, J., Brehmer, B., Leplat, J., 1991. Distributed Decision Making: Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work, John Willey and sons Ltd.
  23. Retkowsky, Y., Jousseaume, C., 1998. La gestion concertée et décentralisée de l'eau en France, Revue internationale de l'eau, 7/8, 27-30.
  24. Rousseau, L., 2003. Comparaison de points de vue pour la formulation de problèmes. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris.
  25. Roy, B., 1985. Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision, Paris, Economica.
  26. Schmidt-Lainé, C., Pavé, A., 2002. Environnement : modélisation et modèles pour comprendre, agir ou décider dans un contexte interdisciplinaire, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 10, Suppl. 1, 5-25.
  27. Shakun, M.F., 1996. Modelling and supporting task-oriented group processes: purposeful complex adaptive systems and evolutionary systems design, Group decision and negociation, 5, 305-317.
  28. Simon, H.A., 1978. Rationality as Process and Product of Thought, American Economic Review, 68, 2, 1-16.
  29. Stahl, G., 2000. Collaborative information environments to support knowledge construction by communities, AI & Society, 14, 1-27.
  30. Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.
  31. Walton, R.E., McKersie, R.B., 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations, New York, McGraw-Hill.



What is OpenURL?

The OpenURL standard is a protocol for transmission of metadata describing the resource that you wish to access. An OpenURL link contains article metadata and directs it to the OpenURL server of your choice. The OpenURL server can provide access to the resource and also offer complementary services (specific search engine, export of references...). The OpenURL link can be generated by different means.
  • If your librarian has set up your subscription with an OpenURL resolver, OpenURL links appear automatically on the abstract pages.
  • You can define your own OpenURL resolver with your EDPS Account. In this case your choice will be given priority over that of your library.
  • You can use an add-on for your browser (Firefox or I.E.) to display OpenURL links on a page (see http://www.openly.com/openurlref/). You should disable this module if you wish to use the OpenURL server that you or your library have defined.